Hind H Neamah1, Anne K Sebert Kuhlmann1,2, Rachel G Tabak3. 1. Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA (Dr Neamah, Dr Sebert Kuhlmann) 2. Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri, USA (Dr Sebert Kuhlmann) 3. Prevention Research Center in St Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA (Dr Tabak)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review the effectiveness of commonly used program modifications classified under cultural adaptation and program translational strategies for the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in terms of risk reduction for type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Authors extracted data about weight, body mass index (BMI), and 5 areas of program modification strategies from 28 interventions and analyzed them in SPSS software. Bivariate analyses examined the odds of achieving a significant reduction in outcomes by each modification of the DPP and by presence of a maintenance component, as well as the mean reduction of weight and BMI by more versus fewer modifications and by the presence of a maintenance component. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in achieving a significant reduction in weight or BMI by any type of modification or by the presence of a maintenance component. Programs with fewer modifications reported significantly greater reduction in mean weight at 12 months postintervention and the furthest time point extracted. Programs with a maintenance component achieved significantly greater reduction in mean weight measured at the furthest time point extracted. CONCLUSIONS: The DPP appears to be programmatically robust to a variety of cultural adaptation and translational strategies. Potentially cost-saving modifications do not seem to reduce effectiveness, which should encourage implementation on a broader scale. Program planners should, however, make efforts to include maintenance components because they appear to significantly reduce risk for acquiring type 2 diabetes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review the effectiveness of commonly used program modifications classified under cultural adaptation and program translational strategies for the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in terms of risk reduction for type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Authors extracted data about weight, body mass index (BMI), and 5 areas of program modification strategies from 28 interventions and analyzed them in SPSS software. Bivariate analyses examined the odds of achieving a significant reduction in outcomes by each modification of the DPP and by presence of a maintenance component, as well as the mean reduction of weight and BMI by more versus fewer modifications and by the presence of a maintenance component. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in achieving a significant reduction in weight or BMI by any type of modification or by the presence of a maintenance component. Programs with fewer modifications reported significantly greater reduction in mean weight at 12 months postintervention and the furthest time point extracted. Programs with a maintenance component achieved significantly greater reduction in mean weight measured at the furthest time point extracted. CONCLUSIONS: The DPP appears to be programmatically robust to a variety of cultural adaptation and translational strategies. Potentially cost-saving modifications do not seem to reduce effectiveness, which should encourage implementation on a broader scale. Program planners should, however, make efforts to include maintenance components because they appear to significantly reduce risk for acquiring type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Y Monique Davis-Smith; Monique Davis-Smith; John Mark Boltri; J Paul Seale; Sylvia Shellenberger; Travis Blalock; Brian Tobin Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Hannah Arem; Steven C Moore; Alpa Patel; Patricia Hartge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Kala Visvanathan; Peter T Campbell; Michal Freedman; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans Olov Adami; Martha S Linet; I-Min Lee; Charles E Matthews Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Ira S Ockene; Trinidad L Tellez; Milagros C Rosal; George W Reed; John Mordes; Philip A Merriam; Barbara C Olendzki; Garry Handelman; Robert Nicolosi; Yunsheng Ma Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: R E Glasgow; E B Fisher; B J Anderson; A LaGreca; D Marrero; S B Johnson; R R Rubin; D J Cox Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jun Ma; Veronica Yank; Lan Xiao; Philip W Lavori; Sandra R Wilson; Lisa G Rosas; Randall S Stafford Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: M Kaye Kramer; Andrea M Kriska; Elizabeth M Venditti; Rachel G Miller; Maria M Brooks; Lora E Burke; Linda M Siminerio; Francis X Solano; Trevor J Orchard Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: John Mark Boltri; Y Monique Davis-Smith; J Paul Seale; Sylvia Shellenberger; Ike S Okosun; Monica E Cornelius Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2008 Jan-Feb
Authors: Erica G Soltero; Crystal Ramos; Allison N Williams; Elva Hooker; Jenny Mendez; Heidi Wildy; Karen Davis; Valentina Hernandez; Omar A Contreras; Maria Silva; Elvia Lish; Gabriel Q Shaibi Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Dina Hafez; Allison Fedewa; Margaret Moran; Matthew O'Brien; Ronald Ackermann; Jeffrey T Kullgren Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: David T Liss; Emily A Finch; Andrew Cooper; Avani Sheth; Ashantí D Tejuosho; Nicola Lancki; Ronald T Ackermann Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; Caitlin M Reardon; Mona AuYoung; Tannaz Moin; Santanu K Datta; Jordan B Sparks; Matthew L Maciejewski; Nanette I Steinle; Jane E Weinreb; Maria Hughes; Lillian F Pinault; Xinran M Xiang; Charles Billington; Caroline R Richardson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Michelle Holdsworth; Mary Nicolaou; Lars Jørun Langøien; Hibbah Araba Osei-Kwasi; Sebastien F M Chastin; F Marijn Stok; Laura Capranica; Nanna Lien; Laura Terragni; Pablo Monsivais; Mario Mazzocchi; Lea Maes; Gun Roos; Caroline Mejean; Katie Powell; Karien Stronks Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Elizabeth L Ciemins; Patricia J Coon; Nicholas C Coombs; Barbara L Holloway; Elizabeth J Mullette; William N Dudley Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2018-04-21