Literature DB >> 26878899

Analysis of Iterative Screening with Stepwise Compound Selection Based on Novartis In-house HTS Data.

Shardul Paricharak1,2,3, Adriaan P IJzerman2, Andreas Bender1, Florian Nigsch3.   

Abstract

With increased automation and larger compound collections, the development of high-throughput screening (HTS) started replacing previous approaches in drug discovery from around the 1980s onward. However, even today it is not always appropriate, or even feasible, to screen large collections of compounds in a particular assay. Here, we present an efficient method for iterative screening of small subsets of compound libraries. With this method, the retrieval of active compounds is optimized using their structural information and biological activity fingerprints. We validated this approach retrospectively on 34 Novartis in-house HTS assays covering a wide range of assay biology, including cell proliferation, antibacterial activity, gene expression, and phosphorylation. This method was employed to retrieve subsets of compounds for screening, where selected hits from any given round of screening were used as starting points to select chemically and biologically similar compounds for the next iteration. By only screening ∼1% of the full screening collection (∼15 000 compounds), the method consistently retrieves diverse compounds belonging to the top 0.5% of the most active compounds for the HTS campaign. For most of the assays, over half of the compounds selected by the method were found to be among the 5% most active compounds of the corresponding full-deck HTS. In addition, the stringency of the iterative method can be modified depending on the number of compounds one can afford to screen, making it a flexible tool to discover active compounds efficiently.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878899     DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Biol        ISSN: 1554-8929            Impact factor:   5.100


  10 in total

1.  Combining structural and bioactivity-based fingerprints improves prediction performance and scaffold hopping capability.

Authors:  Oliver Laufkötter; Noé Sturm; Jürgen Bajorath; Hongming Chen; Ola Engkvist
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.514

2.  Maximizing gain in high-throughput screening using conformal prediction.

Authors:  Fredrik Svensson; Avid M Afzal; Ulf Norinder; Andreas Bender
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.514

3.  QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 1): fingerprint construction and modeling performance for similarity searching, bioactivity classification and scaffold hopping.

Authors:  C Škuta; I Cortés-Ciriano; W Dehaen; P Kříž; G J P van Westen; I V Tetko; A Bender; D Svozil
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  Applications of Systematic Molecular Scaffold Enumeration to Enrich Structure-Activity Relationship Information.

Authors:  N Yi Mok; Nathan Brown
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Data-driven approaches used for compound library design, hit triage and bioactivity modeling in high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Shardul Paricharak; Oscar Méndez-Lucio; Aakash Chavan Ravindranath; Andreas Bender; Adriaan P IJzerman; Gerard J P van Westen
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 6.  Applications of Deep-Learning in Exploiting Large-Scale and Heterogeneous Compound Data in Industrial Pharmaceutical Research.

Authors:  Laurianne David; Josep Arús-Pous; Johan Karlsson; Ola Engkvist; Esben Jannik Bjerrum; Thierry Kogej; Jan M Kriegl; Bernd Beck; Hongming Chen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Successive Statistical and Structure-Based Modeling to Identify Chemically Novel Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Lindsey Burggraaff; Eelke B Lenselink; Willem Jespers; Jesper van Engelen; Brandon J Bongers; Marina Gorostiola González; Rongfang Liu; Holger H Hoos; Herman W T van Vlijmen; Adriaan P IJzerman; Gerard J P van Westen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Using Machine Learning to Predict Synergistic Antimalarial Compound Combinations With Novel Structures.

Authors:  Daniel J Mason; Richard T Eastman; Richard P I Lewis; Ian P Stott; Rajarshi Guha; Andreas Bender
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets.

Authors:  Huikun Zhang; Spencer S Ericksen; Ching-Pei Lee; Gene E Ananiev; Nathan Wlodarchak; Peng Yu; Julie C Mitchell; Anthony Gitter; Stephen J Wright; F Michael Hoffmann; Scott A Wildman; Michael A Newton
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Changing the HTS Paradigm: AI-Driven Iterative Screening for Hit Finding.

Authors:  Gabriel H S Dreiman; Magda Bictash; Paul V Fish; Lewis Griffin; Fredrik Svensson
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.341

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.