Literature DB >> 31396716

Combining structural and bioactivity-based fingerprints improves prediction performance and scaffold hopping capability.

Oliver Laufkötter1,2, Noé Sturm3, Jürgen Bajorath4, Hongming Chen3, Ola Engkvist5.   

Abstract

This study aims at improving upon existing activity predictions methods by augmenting chemical structure fingerprints with bio-activity based fingerprints derived from high-throughput screening (HTS) data (HTSFPs) and thereby showcasing the benefits of combining different descriptor types. This type of descriptor would be applied in an iterative screening scenario for more targeted compound set selection. The HTSFPs were generated from HTS data obtained from PubChem and combined with an ECFP4 structural fingerprint. The bioactivity-structure hybrid (BaSH) fingerprint was benchmarked against the individual ECFP4 and HTSFP fingerprints. Their performance was evaluated via retrospective analysis of a subset of the PubChem HTS data. Results showed that the BaSH fingerprint has improved predictive performance as well as scaffold hopping capability. The BaSH fingerprint identified unique compounds compared to both the ECFP4 and the HTSFP fingerprint indicating synergistic effects between the two fingerprints. A feature importance analysis showed that a small subset of the HTSFP features contribute most to the overall performance of the BaSH fingerprint. This hybrid approach allows for activity prediction of compounds with only sparse HTSFPs due to the supporting effect from the structural fingerprint.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity prediction; Circular fingerprints; ECFP; HTSFP; High throughput screening; Machine learning; Random forest; Scaffold hopping

Year:  2019        PMID: 31396716      PMCID: PMC6686534          DOI: 10.1186/s13321-019-0376-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cheminform        ISSN: 1758-2946            Impact factor:   5.514


  22 in total

Review 1.  Novel miniaturized systems in high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Bronwyn J Battersby; Matt Trau
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  Biological spectra analysis: Linking biological activity profiles to molecular structure.

Authors:  Anton F Fliri; William T Loging; Peter F Thadeio; Robert A Volkmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Practical approaches to efficient screening: information-rich screening protocol.

Authors:  Prabha S Karnachi; Frank K Brown
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2004-12

4.  Circular fingerprints: flexible molecular descriptors with applications from physical chemistry to ADME.

Authors:  Robert C Glem; Andreas Bender; Catrin H Arnby; Lars Carlsson; Scott Boyer; James Smith
Journal:  IDrugs       Date:  2006-03

5.  Drug target identification using side-effect similarity.

Authors:  Monica Campillos; Michael Kuhn; Anne-Claude Gavin; Lars Juhl Jensen; Peer Bork
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Rethinking molecular similarity: comparing compounds on the basis of biological activity.

Authors:  Paula M Petrone; Benjamin Simms; Florian Nigsch; Eugen Lounkine; Peter Kutchukian; Allen Cornett; Zhan Deng; John W Davies; Jeremy L Jenkins; Meir Glick
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 7.  Novel trends in high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Lorenz M Mayr; Dejan Bojanic
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.547

8.  Bioturbo similarity searching: combining chemical and biological similarity to discover structurally diverse bioactive molecules.

Authors:  Anne Mai Wassermann; Eugen Lounkine; Meir Glick
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  A screening pattern recognition method finds new and divergent targets for drugs and natural products.

Authors:  Anne Mai Wassermann; Eugen Lounkine; Laszlo Urban; Steven Whitebread; Shanni Chen; Kevin Hughes; Hongqiu Guo; Elena Kutlina; Alexander Fekete; Martin Klumpp; Meir Glick
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.100

10.  Neural computing in cancer drug development: predicting mechanism of action.

Authors:  J N Weinstein; K W Kohn; M R Grever; V N Viswanadhan; L V Rubinstein; A P Monks; D A Scudiero; L Welch; A D Koutsoukos; A J Chiausa
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Applications of Deep-Learning in Exploiting Large-Scale and Heterogeneous Compound Data in Industrial Pharmaceutical Research.

Authors:  Laurianne David; Josep Arús-Pous; Johan Karlsson; Ola Engkvist; Esben Jannik Bjerrum; Thierry Kogej; Jan M Kriegl; Bernd Beck; Hongming Chen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  VenomPred: A Machine Learning Based Platform for Molecular Toxicity Predictions.

Authors:  Salvatore Galati; Miriana Di Stefano; Elisa Martinelli; Marco Macchia; Adriano Martinelli; Giulio Poli; Tiziano Tuccinardi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Visualization of Topological Pharmacophore Space with Graph Edit Distance.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakano; Tomoyuki Miyao
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-12

4.  In vitro characterization and rational analog design of a novel inhibitor of telomerase assembly in MDA MB 231 breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  Daniel Gomez; Diego Mengual Gómez; Romina Armando; Maia Cabrera; Roman Vilarullo; Patricio Chinestrad; Julian Maggio; Camila Paderta; Pablo Lorenzano Menna
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.136

5.  Predictive Models to Identify Small Molecule Activators and Inhibitors of Opioid Receptors.

Authors:  Srilatha Sakamuru; Jinghua Zhao; Menghang Xia; Huixiao Hong; Anton Simeonov; Iosif Vaisman; Ruili Huang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.