Literature DB >> 26878198

Using MD Simulations To Calculate How Solvents Modulate Solubility.

Shuai Liu, Shannon Cao, Kevin Hoang, Kayla L Young1, Andrew S Paluch1, David L Mobley.   

Abstract

Here, our interest is in predicting solubility in general, and we focus particularly on predicting how the solubility of particular solutes is modulated by the solvent environment. Solubility in general is extremely important, both for theoretical reasons - it provides an important probe of the balance between solute-solute and solute-solvent interactions - and for more practical reasons, such as how to control the solubility of a given solute via modulation of its environment, as in process chemistry and separations. Here, we study how the change of solvent affects the solubility of a given compound. That is, we calculate relative solubilities. We use MD simulations to calculate relative solubility and compare our calculated values with experiment as well as with results from several other methods, SMD and UNIFAC, the latter of which is commonly used in chemical engineering design. We find that straightforward solubility calculations based on molecular simulations using a general small-molecule force field outperform SMD and UNIFAC both in terms of accuracy and coverage of the relevant chemical space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878198      PMCID: PMC4945102          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  45 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Prediction of SAMPL2 aqueous solvation free energies and tautomeric ratios using the SM8, SM8AD, and SMD solvation models.

Authors:  Raphael F Ribeiro; Aleksandr V Marenich; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Efficient Computation of the Total Solvation Energy of Small Molecules via the R6 Generalized Born Model.

Authors:  Boris Aguilar; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

7.  Computing the free energy of molecular solids by the Einstein molecule approach: ices XIII and XIV, hard-dumbbells and a patchy model of proteins.

Authors:  E G Noya; M M Conde; C Vega
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Force Field Benchmark of Organic Liquids. 2. Gibbs Energy of Solvation.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Badamkhatan Tuguldur; David van der Spoel
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  New Interaction Parameters for Oxygen Compounds in the GROMOS Force Field: Improved Pure-Liquid and Solvation Properties for Alcohols, Ethers, Aldehydes, Ketones, Carboxylic Acids, and Esters.

Authors:  Bruno A C Horta; Patrick F J Fuchs; Wilfred F van Gunsteren; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  10 in total

1.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Predicting cyclohexane/water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using MOSCED and the SMD solvation model.

Authors:  Sebastian Diaz-Rodriguez; Samantha M Bozada; Jeremy R Phifer; Andrew S Paluch
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 12.981

4.  Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Kalistyn H Burley; Michael Chiu; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Approaches for calculating solvation free energies and enthalpies demonstrated with an update of the FreeSolv database.

Authors:  Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos; Daisy Y Kyu; Hannes H Loeffler; John D Chodera; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Eng Data       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 6.  Computational prediction of drug solubility in water-based systems: Qualitative and quantitative approaches used in the current drug discovery and development setting.

Authors:  Christel A S Bergström; Per Larsson
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.875

7.  Explicit solvation thermodynamics in ionic solution: extending grid inhomogeneous solvation theory to solvation free energy of salt-water mixtures.

Authors:  Franz Waibl; Johannes Kraml; Monica L Fernández-Quintero; Johannes R Loeffler; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.179

8.  GAFF/IPolQ-Mod+LJ-Fit: Optimized force field parameters for solvation free energy predictions.

Authors:  Andreas Mecklenfeld; Gabriele Raabe
Journal:  ADMET DMPK       Date:  2020-06-28

9.  Evaluation of solvation free energies for small molecules with the AMOEBA polarizable force field.

Authors:  Noor Asidah Mohamed; Richard T Bradshaw; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  A Polarization-Consistent Model for Alcohols to Predict Solvation Free Energies.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Barrera; Miguel Jorge
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.956

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.