Literature DB >> 26870589

Crystal structure of (RS)-(4-chloro-phen-yl)(pyridin-2-yl)methanol.

Badiadka Narayana1, Balladka K Sarojini2, Hemmige S Yathirajan3, Ravindranath Rathore4, Christopher Glidewell5.   

Abstract

In the title racemic compound, C12H10ClNO, the dihedral angle between the benzene and pyridine rings is 74.34 (6)°. In the crystal, the mol-ecules are linked by O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming zigzag C(5) [001] chains in which alternating R- and S-configuration mol-ecules are related by c-glide symmetry. In addition, inversion-related pairs of mol-ecules are linked into dimers by pairs of weak C-Cl⋯π(pyrid-yl) inter-actions, which link the hydrogen-bonded chains into (100) sheets. Structural comparisons are drawn with a number of related compounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; halogen–pyridine inter­actions; hydrogen bonds; supra­molecular structure

Year:  2016        PMID: 26870589      PMCID: PMC4704747          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Simply substituted di­phenyl­methanols, RPh2COH, exhibit a very rich diversity of supra­molecular arrangements, including isolated mol­ecules, hydrogen-bonded dimers, trimers, tetra­mers and hexa­mers, as well as continuous hydrogen-bonded chains (Ferguson et al., 1992 ▸, 1994 ▸, 1995 ▸). The predominant mode of mol­ecular association in these structures involves O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, although O—H⋯π(arene) inter­actions are sometimes present. It is therefore of considerable inter­est to investigate the influence of an addition potential acceptor of hydrogen bonds as achieved, for example, by the replacement of one of the phenyl rings by an isosteric pyridyl substituent. Here we report the mol­ecular and supra­molecular structure of (RS)-4-chloro­phen­yl(pyridin-2-yl)methanol (I) (Fig. 1 ▸), which shows some striking structural differences from the simpler, non-chlorinated analogue phen­yl(pyridin-2-yl)methanol, whose structure has been reported recently (Kim & Kang, 2014 ▸; Tsang et al., 2015 ▸).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the R-enanti­omer of compound (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecules of compound (I) contain a stereogenic centre at atom C1 (Fig. 1 ▸) and the reference mol­ecule was selected as one having the R-configuration at atom C1. The centrosymmetric space group confirms that compound (I) has crystallized as a racemic mixture. Both of the rings are rotated out of the plane of the central C11–C1–C22 fragment, which makes dihedral angles of 70.69 (2) and 84.66 (9)° with the phenyl and pyridyl rings, respectively. The dihedral angle between the rings is 74.34 (6)°, and this value is very similar to the value of 71.42 (10)° reported (Kim & Kang, 2014 ▸) for the corres­ponding angle in the non-chlorinated analogue, compound (II). The general conformational similarity between the mol­ecules of compounds (I) and (II) is shown by the torsional angles O—CCC and O—CC—N (Table 1 ▸), where the corresponding angles for the R-enanti­omer of (II) [the reference mol­ecule was actually selected (Kim & Kang, 2014 ▸) as one having the S-configuration] are 49.0 (4) and −150.6 (2)°, respectively.
Table 1

Selected torsion angles (°)

O1—C1—C11—C12−51.14 (17)C11—C1—O1—H1A −180.0 (17)
O1—C1—C22—N21−156.41 (13)  
However, one point of difference between the conformations in compounds (I) and (II) centres on the locations of the hydroxyl H atoms. In compound (I), this atom is anti­periplanar to atom C11 (Table 1 ▸), but the corresponding torsional angle for the R-enanti­omer of (II) is −67 (2)°. This difference in hydroxyl group conformations is probably associated with the different patterns of hydrogen-bonded supra­molecular aggregation in compounds (I) and (II), as discussed below.

Supra­molecular inter­actions

The mol­ecules of compound (I) are linked by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (Table 2 ▸), forming zigzag C(5) chains running parallel to the [001] direction. The chain containing the reference mol­ecule at (x, y, z) consists of mol­ecules which are related by the c-glide plane at y = , so that mol­ecules of R-configuration and S-configuration alternate along the chain (Fig. 2 ▸). Two chains of this type, related to one another by inversion, pass through each unit cell.
Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯N21i 0.84 (2)2.01 (2)2.8444 (18)176 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) .

Figure 2

Part of the crystal structure of compound (I), showing the formation of a hydrogen-bonded C(5) chain containing alternating enanti­omers and running parallel to [001]. For the sake of clarity, the H atoms bonded to the ring C atoms have been omitted. The atoms marked with an asterisk (*), a hash (#) or a dollar sign ($) are at the symmetry positions (x,  − y,  + z), (x,  − y, − + z) and (x, y, 1 + z), respectively.

The crystal structure of compound (I) contains neither C—H⋯π hydrogen bonds nor π–π stacking inter­actions. There is, however, a single short C—Cl⋯π contact with geometric parameters Cl⋯Cg i = 3.5280 (10) Å, CCg i = 5.1785 (19) Å and C—Cl⋯Cg i = 157.79 (7)° [symmetry code: (i) 1 − x, −y, −z] where Cg represents the centroid of the pyridine ring. This Cl⋯Cg distance is slightly shorter than the average distance, 3.6 Å, deduced (Imai et al., 2008 ▸) from database analysis in a study which concluded that such inter­actions were attractive, with inter­action energies of ca 2 kcal mol−1, comparable to those typical of weak hydrogen bonds (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999 ▸). In compound (I), this inter­action links inversion-related pairs of mol­ecules into cyclic centrosymmetric dimers (Fig. 3 ▸).
Figure 3

A centrosymmetric dimer in in the crystal of (I) in which the mol­ecules are linked by C—Cl⋯π inter­actions, shown as hollow lines. For the sake of clarity, all of the H atoms have been omitted. The Cl atom marked with an asterisk (*) is at the symmetry position (1 − x, −y, −z).

The overall effect of the C—Cl⋯π inter­action in (I) is to link the hydrogen-bonded chain containing mol­ecules related by the c-glide plane at y = directly to the two chains that contain mol­ecules related by the glide planes at y = − and y = , respectively, and propagation by translation of this inter­action links the hydrogen-bonded chains along [001] into a sheet lying parallel to (100) (Fig. 4 ▸), but there are no direction-specific inter­actions between adjacent sheets.
Figure 4

A view of part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the formation of a sheet parallel to (001) built from hydrogen-bonded chains linked by C—Cl⋯π inter­actions. For the sake of clarity, the H atoms bonded to C atoms have all been omitted.

Structural comparisons with related compounds

It is of inter­est briefly to compare the supra­molecular assembly in compound (I), mediated by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and C—Cl⋯π inter­actions, with the assembly in some closely related compounds (II)–(VIII) (see Fig. 5 ▸), and particularly with compound (II), whose constitution differs from that of (I) only in lacking the chloro substituent.
Figure 5

Related compounds.

The mol­ecules of compound (II) are linked into C(5) chains by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (Kim & Kang, 2014 ▸; Tsang et al., 2015 ▸), as in compound (I), but in (II) helical chains are built from mol­ecules related by 21 screw axes in space group Pna21, whereas in (I) zigzag chains are built from mol­ecules related by glide planes. Hence in compound (II) each chain is homochiral, with equal numbers of chains built only from mol­ecules having the R-configuration or only from mol­ecules having the S-configuration: in (I), by contrast, each chain contains an alternation of the two enanti­omers (cf. Fig. 2 ▸). Similar homochiral C(5) chains are formed in each of the three isomeric carborane derivatives (III)–(V) (Tsang et al., 2015 ▸), regardless of whether they are crystallized as single enanti­omers or as racemates. The structure of compound (VI), which is isomeric with (II) has been reported briefly (Shimada et al., 2003 ▸) but, unfortunately, no atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸). The structure report on (VI) concerns enanti­omerically pure forms, in space group P212121, so that the formation of homochiral helical chains of C(7) type, seems plausible. Compound (VII), which differs from (I) and (II) in containing two unsubstituted phenyl rings but no pyridyl ring, crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in space group P22121 (Ferguson et al., 1995 ▸) and the mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form (4) chains, but with no direction-specific inter­actions between adjacent chains. Compound (VIII) is the penta­fluoro­phenyl analogue of (VII) and the mol­ecules are again linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, but now forming cyclic (12) hexa­mers having exact (S 6) symmetry (Ferguson et al., 1995 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

A sample of the title compound (I) was a gift from CAD Pharma, Bengaluru, India. Colourless blocks were grown by slow evaporation at room temperature of a solution in methanol, m.p. 478 K.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. All H atoms were located in difference maps. The H atoms bonded to C atoms were then treated as riding atoms in geometrically idealized position with C—H distances of 0.93 Å (aromatic and heteroaromatic) or 0.98 Å (aliphatic CH) and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C). For the hydroxyl H atom H1A, the atomic coordinates were refined with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O), giving an O—H distance of 0.84 (2) Å. The analysis of variance reported a large value of K, 3.187, for the group of 252 very weak reflections having F c/F c(max) in the range 0.000 < F c/F c(max) < 0.005.
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H10ClNO
M r 219.66
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c (Å)8.4309 (6), 16.1488 (11), 8.6878 (6)
β (°)112.994 (2)
V3)1088.85 (13)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.32
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
T min, T max 0.719, 0.938
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections11481, 2510, 1860
R int 0.030
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.651
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.045, 0.118, 1.06
No. of reflections2510
No. of parameters139
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.21, −0.39

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2012 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1440028 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H10ClNOF(000) = 456
Mr = 219.66Dx = 1.340 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.4309 (6) ÅCell parameters from 2785 reflections
b = 16.1488 (11) Åθ = 2.5–28.6°
c = 8.6878 (6) ŵ = 0.32 mm1
β = 112.994 (2)°T = 295 K
V = 1088.85 (13) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer2510 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1860 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.6°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)h = −9→10
Tmin = 0.719, Tmax = 0.938k = −21→15
11481 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.118w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0513P)2 + 0.2352P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2510 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
139 parametersΔρmin = −0.39 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.66425 (18)0.19218 (9)0.43123 (18)0.0367 (3)
H10.63400.24990.39760.044*
O10.65282 (15)0.17831 (8)0.58744 (14)0.0475 (3)
H1A0.725 (3)0.2105 (14)0.655 (3)0.071*
C110.53625 (18)0.13554 (9)0.30436 (19)0.0358 (3)
C120.5356 (2)0.05176 (10)0.3383 (2)0.0458 (4)
H120.61280.03130.44000.055*
C130.4232 (2)−0.00168 (11)0.2247 (2)0.0533 (5)
H130.4239−0.05780.24920.064*
C140.3099 (2)0.02875 (12)0.0747 (2)0.0548 (5)
Cl140.16964 (9)−0.03856 (4)−0.07147 (8)0.0922 (3)
C150.3058 (3)0.11173 (14)0.0391 (2)0.0668 (6)
H150.22700.1321−0.06190.080*
C160.4198 (2)0.16462 (11)0.1546 (2)0.0538 (5)
H160.41750.22080.13040.065*
N210.88793 (16)0.21277 (8)0.32519 (16)0.0414 (3)
C220.84457 (18)0.17470 (9)0.43935 (18)0.0339 (3)
C230.9548 (2)0.12092 (11)0.5561 (2)0.0461 (4)
H230.92190.09590.63530.055*
C241.1140 (2)0.10498 (12)0.5534 (2)0.0537 (5)
H241.18990.06880.63040.064*
C251.1589 (2)0.14314 (12)0.4359 (3)0.0570 (5)
H251.26580.13350.43140.068*
C261.0431 (2)0.19599 (11)0.3247 (2)0.0523 (4)
H261.07410.22160.24460.063*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0359 (8)0.0344 (8)0.0421 (8)0.0029 (6)0.0178 (7)0.0000 (6)
O10.0520 (7)0.0526 (7)0.0455 (7)−0.0078 (6)0.0272 (6)−0.0106 (5)
C110.0323 (7)0.0373 (8)0.0411 (8)0.0010 (6)0.0177 (6)−0.0001 (6)
C120.0452 (9)0.0401 (9)0.0485 (9)0.0034 (7)0.0142 (7)0.0020 (7)
C130.0589 (11)0.0406 (9)0.0629 (12)−0.0057 (9)0.0265 (10)−0.0055 (8)
C140.0524 (10)0.0617 (12)0.0497 (10)−0.0168 (9)0.0194 (8)−0.0134 (9)
Cl140.0971 (5)0.0942 (5)0.0724 (4)−0.0416 (4)0.0190 (3)−0.0316 (3)
C150.0667 (12)0.0685 (13)0.0465 (10)−0.0118 (11)0.0019 (9)0.0068 (10)
C160.0554 (10)0.0464 (10)0.0502 (10)−0.0044 (8)0.0105 (8)0.0095 (8)
N210.0390 (7)0.0417 (7)0.0450 (8)−0.0018 (6)0.0182 (6)0.0005 (6)
C220.0341 (7)0.0318 (7)0.0351 (8)−0.0016 (6)0.0128 (6)−0.0041 (6)
C230.0452 (9)0.0492 (9)0.0430 (9)0.0064 (8)0.0162 (7)0.0031 (8)
C240.0418 (9)0.0553 (11)0.0563 (11)0.0135 (8)0.0108 (8)−0.0005 (9)
C250.0357 (8)0.0633 (12)0.0748 (13)0.0032 (9)0.0245 (9)−0.0093 (10)
C260.0459 (9)0.0566 (11)0.0637 (11)−0.0050 (9)0.0315 (9)−0.0009 (9)
C1—O11.4154 (18)C15—C161.381 (3)
C1—C111.512 (2)C15—H150.9300
C1—C221.5206 (19)C16—H160.9300
C1—H10.9800N21—C221.3335 (19)
O1—H1A0.84 (2)N21—C261.338 (2)
C11—C161.371 (2)C22—C231.382 (2)
C11—C121.385 (2)C23—C241.376 (2)
C12—C131.373 (2)C23—H230.9300
C12—H120.9300C24—C251.367 (3)
C13—C141.371 (3)C24—H240.9300
C13—H130.9300C25—C261.370 (3)
C14—C151.373 (3)C25—H250.9300
C14—Cl141.7376 (18)C26—H260.9300
O1—C1—C11107.86 (12)C16—C15—H15120.3
O1—C1—C22111.56 (12)C11—C16—C15121.00 (17)
C11—C1—C22109.72 (11)C11—C16—H16119.5
O1—C1—H1109.2C15—C16—H16119.5
C11—C1—H1109.2C22—N21—C26117.48 (14)
C22—C1—H1109.2N21—C22—C23122.29 (13)
C1—O1—H1A105.9 (15)N21—C22—C1116.07 (13)
C16—C11—C12118.40 (15)C23—C22—C1121.63 (13)
C16—C11—C1121.82 (14)C24—C23—C22119.09 (16)
C12—C11—C1119.78 (14)C24—C23—H23120.5
C13—C12—C11121.32 (16)C22—C23—H23120.5
C13—C12—H12119.3C25—C24—C23119.03 (17)
C11—C12—H12119.3C25—C24—H24120.5
C14—C13—C12119.13 (17)C23—C24—H24120.5
C14—C13—H13120.4C24—C25—C26118.56 (15)
C12—C13—H13120.4C24—C25—H25120.7
C13—C14—C15120.73 (17)C26—C25—H25120.7
C13—C14—Cl14119.54 (15)N21—C26—C25123.55 (16)
C15—C14—Cl14119.73 (15)N21—C26—H26118.2
C14—C15—C16119.40 (18)C25—C26—H26118.2
C14—C15—H15120.3
O1—C1—C11—C16129.16 (15)C26—N21—C22—C231.2 (2)
C22—C1—C11—C16−109.13 (16)C26—N21—C22—C1−177.31 (14)
O1—C1—C11—C12−51.14 (17)O1—C1—C22—N21−156.41 (13)
C22—C1—C11—C1270.57 (17)C11—C1—C22—N2184.12 (16)
C16—C11—C12—C130.9 (2)O1—C1—C22—C2325.1 (2)
C1—C11—C12—C13−178.84 (14)C11—C1—C22—C23−94.42 (16)
C11—C12—C13—C140.2 (3)N21—C22—C23—C24−1.0 (2)
C12—C13—C14—C15−1.3 (3)C1—C22—C23—C24177.48 (15)
C12—C13—C14—Cl14178.90 (13)C22—C23—C24—C250.3 (3)
C13—C14—C15—C161.4 (3)C23—C24—C25—C260.0 (3)
Cl14—C14—C15—C16−178.83 (15)C22—N21—C26—C25−0.9 (3)
C12—C11—C16—C15−0.8 (3)C24—C25—C26—N210.3 (3)
C1—C11—C16—C15178.90 (16)C11—C1—O1—H1A−180.0 (17)
C14—C15—C16—C11−0.3 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···N21i0.84 (2)2.01 (2)2.8444 (18)176 (2)
  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Cl-pi interactions in protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Yumi N Imai; Yoshihisa Inoue; Isao Nakanishi; Kazuo Kitaura
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

6.  Crystal structure of phen-yl(pyridin-2-yl)methanol.

Authors:  Haneol Kim; Sung Kwon Kang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-08-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.