Nicola Saywell1, Nick Taylor2, Emma Rodgers3, Luke Skinner4, Mark Boocock1. 1. 1 Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. 2 Hand Institute, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. 3 Southern Physiotherapy, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. 4 Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of play-based interventions compared to traditional therapy in rehabilitation of adults with adult-acquired brain injury. DATA SOURCES: The search was performed using Medline; Cinahl Plus; Health Source (Nursing/Academic Edition); Psychology and behavioural sciences collection; Biomedical reference collection (basic). REVIEW METHODS: Studies included were randomised controlled trials that investigated the effect of play-based interventions on physical function of adults with adult acquired brain injury. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies and assessed methodological quality using a modified Downs and Black. Meta-analysis compared standardised differences in means, to determine effect sizes for grouped functional outcome measures. The GRADE scoring system was used to determine the level of clinical evidence. RESULTS: Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria, 13 were considered high quality and 17 moderate quality. Studies predominantly involved post-stroke participants, with only three studies including participants with traumatic brain injury. When compared to traditional therapy, dose-matched studies of play-based interventions showed a significant effect on independence (Effect size (ES) = 0.6) and physical performance (ES = 0.43), as measured using the Fugl -Meyer. For non-dose matched studies, play-based interventions showed a significant improvement for balance (ES = 0.76) compared with traditional therapy. In all studies that measured participant enjoyment, play-based therapy was rated as more enjoyable than traditional therapy. CONCLUSION: Play-based interventions for people with adult acquired brain injury are more effective in improving balance and independence, which may be due to them being more enjoyable than traditional therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of play-based interventions compared to traditional therapy in rehabilitation of adults with adult-acquired brain injury. DATA SOURCES: The search was performed using Medline; Cinahl Plus; Health Source (Nursing/Academic Edition); Psychology and behavioural sciences collection; Biomedical reference collection (basic). REVIEW METHODS: Studies included were randomised controlled trials that investigated the effect of play-based interventions on physical function of adults with adult acquired brain injury. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies and assessed methodological quality using a modified Downs and Black. Meta-analysis compared standardised differences in means, to determine effect sizes for grouped functional outcome measures. The GRADE scoring system was used to determine the level of clinical evidence. RESULTS: Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria, 13 were considered high quality and 17 moderate quality. Studies predominantly involved post-strokeparticipants, with only three studies including participants with traumatic brain injury. When compared to traditional therapy, dose-matched studies of play-based interventions showed a significant effect on independence (Effect size (ES) = 0.6) and physical performance (ES = 0.43), as measured using the Fugl -Meyer. For non-dose matched studies, play-based interventions showed a significant improvement for balance (ES = 0.76) compared with traditional therapy. In all studies that measured participant enjoyment, play-based therapy was rated as more enjoyable than traditional therapy. CONCLUSION: Play-based interventions for people with adult acquired brain injury are more effective in improving balance and independence, which may be due to them being more enjoyable than traditional therapy.
Authors: Steinunn A Olafsdottir; Helga Jonsdottir; Charlotte Magnusson; Héctor Caltenco; Mikko Kytö; Laura Maye; David McGookin; Ingibjörg Bjartmarz; Solveig Asa Arnadottir; Ingibjörg Hjaltadottir; Thora B Hafsteinsdottir Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Steinunn A Olafsdottir; Helga Jonsdottir; Ingibjörg Bjartmarz; Charlotte Magnusson; Héctor Caltenco; Mikko Kytö; Laura Maye; David McGookin; Solveig Asa Arnadottir; Ingibjörg Hjaltadottir; Thora B Hafsteinsdottir Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Nahid Norouzi-Gheidari; Alejandro Hernandez; Philippe S Archambault; Johanne Higgins; Lise Poissant; Dahlia Kairy Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 3.390