Literature DB >> 26869298

Improving quality in healthcare: What makes a satisfied patient?

A Más1, P Parra2, R M Bermejo3, M D Hidalgo3, J E Calle2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To update the metric properties of a perceived quality questionnaire for patients admitted to hospital medical departments, to determine the level of patient satisfaction achieved, and to identify the variables which predict satisfaction.
METHODS: Self-administered questionnaire completed at home following patient discharge, using a questionnaire prepared by the authors on a sample of 7207 users of medical departments in 9 public hospitals during the years 2006-2009. A principal component analysis with varimax rotation was performed. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency coefficient. An analysis was made of the compliance with each indicator reported by respondents. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the perceived quality dimensions which predicted overall patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: The results of the reliability analysis indicated good coefficients for interpersonal manner (0.94) and professional competence (0.85) dimensions, and moderate values for the other dimensions (comfort 0.55, information 0.38, and organisation 0.37). Factor analyses showed single factors in each of the perceived quality dimensions, with a percentage of explained variance greater than 35% for information, interpersonal manner, professional competence, and comfort, and less than 30% for organisation. The dimensions which predicted satisfaction were interpersonal manner of healthcare staff, professional competence, and information.
CONCLUSIONS: The metric properties of the questionnaire used have been updated, yielding a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing patient satisfaction in quality management programmes, both for internal purposes and for conducting external comparisons. A positive relationship was obtained between the level of patient satisfaction and level of professional competence, interpersonal manner of healthcare staff, and information received.
Copyright © 2016 SECA. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calidad de atención; Cuestionarios; Encuesta; Patient satisfaction; Quality of care; Questionnaires; Satisfacción del paciente; Satisfacción en la asistencia sanitaria; Satisfaction in healthcare; Survey; Validez; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26869298     DOI: 10.1016/j.cali.2015.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Calid Asist        ISSN: 1134-282X


  6 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction with out-patient rehabilitation therapy: validity and reliability.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee; Se-Yeon Park; Ji Sun Ha
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-12-27

2.  The Mixed-Method 5W2D Approach for Health System Stakeholders Analysis in Quality of Care: An Application to the Moroccan Context.

Authors:  Youness Frichi; Fouad Jawab; Said Boutahari
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  [Influence of the covid-19 pandemic period of alert on perceived quality of hospital emergencies].

Authors:  J J López-Picazo Ferrer; I Vidal-Abarca Gutiérrez; D Beteta Fernández; M López Ibáñez
Journal:  J Healthc Qual Res       Date:  2020-11-21

Review 4.  Effectiveness of the Validation Method in Work Satisfaction and Motivation of Nursing Home Care Professionals: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Iván Sánchez-Martínez; Raül Vilar; Javier Irujo; Duna Ulsamer; Dolors Cano; Celia Casaca Soares; Ángel Acevedo; Javier Jerez-Roig; Montserrat Celdrán
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Hospital: Inpatient's Perceived Quality in Spain.

Authors:  Julio J Lopez-Picazo; Inmaculada Vidal-Abarca; Dolores Beteta; Mercedes López-Ibáñez; Elisa García-Vázquez
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-03-03

6.  Improving People's Self-Reported Experience with the Health Services: The Role of Non-Clinical Factors.

Authors:  Ángel Fernández-Pérez; Ángeles Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.