Literature DB >> 26869077

Cervical cages placed bilaterally in the facet joints from a posterior approach significantly increase foraminal area.

Kris Siemionow1, Piotr Janusz2,3, Pawel Glowka4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Foraminal stenosis is a common cause of cervical radiculopathy. Posterior cervical cages can indirectly increase foraminal area and decompress the nerve root. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of bilateral posterior cervical cages on the surface area and shape of the neural foramen.
METHODS: Radiographic analysis was performed on 43 subjects enrolled in a prospective, multi-center study. CT scans were obtained at baseline and 6- and 12-months after cervical fusion using bilateral posterior cervical cages. The following measurements were performed on CT scan: foraminal area (A), theoretical area (TA), height (H), superior diagonal (DSI), inferior diagonal (DIS), and inferior diagonal without implant (DISI). Comparisons were performed using R-ANOVA with a significance of α < 0.05.
RESULTS: Foraminal area, height, TA and DISI were significantly greater following placement of the implant. The mean (SD) A increased from 4.01 (1.09) mm(2) before surgery to 4.24 (1.00) mm(2) at 6 months, and 4.18 (1.05) mm(2) at 12 months after surgery (p < 0.0001). Foraminal height (H) increased from mean (SD) 9.20 (1.08) mm at baseline to 9.65 (1.06) mm and 9.55 (1.14) mm at 6- and 12-months post-operatively, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean DIS did not change significantly. There was a significant decrease in DSI: 6.18 (1.59) mm pre-operatively, 5.95 (1.47) mm and 5.73 (1.46) mm at 6- and 12-months (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of bilateral posterior cervical cages can increase foraminal area and may indirectly decompress the nerve roots. Correlation between increase in foraminal area and clinical outcomes needs further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical radiculopathy; Cervical spondylopathy; DTRAX; Foraminal area; Posterior cervical cage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26869077     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4430-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine.

Authors:  J U Yoo; D Zou; W T Edwards; J Bayley; H A Yuan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine.

Authors:  N Tanaka; Y Fujimoto; H S An; Y Ikuta; M Yasuda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Dynamic intervertebral foramen narrowing during simulated rear impact.

Authors:  Manohar M Panjabi; Travis G Maak; Paul C Ivancic; Shigeki Ito
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of an interfacet joint decompression and stabilization system.

Authors:  Jeremi M Leasure; Jenni Buckley
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Effect of machined interfacet allograft spacers on cervical foraminal height and area.

Authors:  Lee A Tan; Carter S Gerard; Paul A Anderson; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-12-13

6.  Transvertebral anterior cervical foraminotomy: midterm outcomes of clinical and radiological assessments including the finite element method.

Authors:  Daisuke Umebayashi; Masahito Hara; Yasuhiro Nakajima; Yusuke Nishimura; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Revision rates and complication incidence in single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures: an administrative database study.

Authors:  Anand Veeravagu; Tyler Cole; Bowen Jiang; John K Ratliff
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hua Jiang; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Bangping Qian; Xusheng Qiu; Mingliang Ji
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Cervical radiculopathy: a review.

Authors:  John M Caridi; Matthias Pumberger; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-09

10.  Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenyong Shou; Zhe Li; Huan Wang; Chongnan Yan; Qi Liu; Chi Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.

Authors:  James Meacock; Moritz Schramm; Senthil Selvanathan; Stuart Currie; Deborah Stocken; David Jayne; Simon Thomson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Effectiveness of cervical zero profile integrated cage with and without supplemental posterior Interfacet stabilization.

Authors:  Robert M Havey; Kenneth R Blank; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Muturi G Muriuki; Suguna Pappu; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Biomechanical Analysis of an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Pseudarthrosis Model Revised With Machined Interfacet Allograft Spacers.

Authors:  Raymond J Hah; Ram Alluri; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-22

4.  Length of stay associated with posterior cervical fusion with intervertebral cages: experience from a device registry.

Authors:  Kris Siemionow; William Smith; Mark Gillespy; Bruce M McCormack; Mukund I Gundanna; Jon E Block
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

5.  Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Leonard I Voronov; Krzysztof B Siemionow; Robert M Havey; Gerard Carandang; Frank M Phillips; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-07-13

6.  Multilevel cervical laminectomy and fusion with posterior cervical cages.

Authors:  Jad N Bou Monsef; Krzysztof B Siemionow
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

7.  Perioperative complications in patients treated with posterior cervical fusion and bilateral cages.

Authors:  Krzysztof B Siemionow; Pawel Glowka; Robert J Blok; Mark C Gillespy; Mukund I Gundanna; William D Smith; Zeshan Hyder; Bruce M McCormack
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Intraoperative image guidance for cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Sertac Kirnaz; Harry Gebhard; Taylor Wong; Raj Nangunoori; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Kosuke Sato; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of DTRAX(®) posterior cervical cage stabilization with and without lateral mass fixation.

Authors:  Leonard I Voronov; Krzysztof B Siemionow; Robert M Havey; Gerard Carandang; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-08-23

Review 10.  Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Karishma Gupta; William D Smith
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-03-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.