Literature DB >> 26868173

Surface modification of 3D-printed porous scaffolds via mussel-inspired polydopamine and effective immobilization of rhBMP-2 to promote osteogenic differentiation for bone tissue engineering.

Sang Jin Lee1, Donghyun Lee2, Taek Rim Yoon3, Hyung Keun Kim3, Ha Hyeon Jo4, Ji Sun Park4, Jun Hee Lee4, Wan Doo Kim4, Il Keun Kwon5, Su A Park6.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: For tissue engineering, a bio-porous scaffold which is applied to bone-tissue regeneration should provide the hydrophilicity for cell attachment as well as provide for the capability to bind a bioactive molecule such as a growth factor in order to improve cell differentiation. In this work, we prepared a three-dimensional (3D) printed polycaprolactone scaffold (PCLS) grafted with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP2) attached via polydopamine (DOPA) chemistry. The DOPA coated PCL scaffold was characterized by contact angle, water uptake, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) in order to certify that the surface was successfully coated with DOPA. In order to test the loading and release of rhBMP2, we examined the release rate for 28days. For the In vitro cell study, pre-osteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded onto PCL scaffolds (PCLSs), DOPA coated PCL scaffold (PCLSD), and scaffolds with varying concentrations of rhBMP2 grafted onto the PCLSD 100 and PCLSD 500 (100 and 500ng/ml loaded), respectively. These scaffolds were evaluated by cell proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, and real time polymerase chain reaction with immunochemistry in order to verify their osteogenic activity. Through these studies, we demonstrated that our fabricated scaffolds were well coated with DOPA as well as grafted with rhBMP2 at a quantity of 22.7±5ng when treatment with 100ng/ml rhBMP2 and 153.3±2.4ng when treated with 500ng/ml rhBMP2. This grafting enables rhBMP2 to be released in a sustained pattern. In the in vitro results, the cell proliferation and an osteoconductivity of PCLSD 500 groups was greater than any other group. All of these results suggest that our manufactured 3D printed porous scaffold would be a useful construct for application to the bone tissue engineering field. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Tissue-engineered scaffolds are not only extremely complex and cumbersome, but also use organic solvents which can negatively influence cellular function. Thus, a rapid, solvent-free method is necessary to improve scaffold generation. Recently, 3D printing such as a rapid prototyping technique has several benefits in that manufacturing is a simple process using computer aided design and scaffolds can be generated without using solvents. In this study, we designed a bio-active scaffold using a very simple and direct method to manufacture DOPA coated 3D PCL porous scaffold grafted with rhBMP2 as a means to create bone-tissue regenerative scaffolds. To our knowledge, our approach can allow for the generation of scaffolds which possessed good properties for use as bone-tissue scaffolds.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; Bone tissue engineering; Polycaprolactone; Recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26868173     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  34 in total

1.  A sequential 3D bioprinting and orthogonal bioconjugation approach for precision tissue engineering.

Authors:  Claire Yu; Kathleen L Miller; Jacob Schimelman; Pengrui Wang; Wei Zhu; Xuanyi Ma; Min Tang; Shangting You; Deepak Lakshmipathy; Frank He; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gareth Turnbull; Jon Clarke; Frédéric Picard; Philip Riches; Luanluan Jia; Fengxuan Han; Bin Li; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  3D printing and intraoperative neuronavigation tailoring for skull base reconstruction after extended endoscopic endonasal surgery: proof of concept.

Authors:  Walid I Essayed; Prashin Unadkat; Ahmed Hosny; Sarah Frisken; Marcio S Rassi; Srinivasan Mukundan; James C Weaver; Ossama Al-Mefty; Alexandra J Golby; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 4.  3D Bioprinting for Organ Regeneration.

Authors:  Haitao Cui; Margaret Nowicki; John P Fisher; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 9.933

5.  3D printed antimicrobial PLA constructs functionalised with zinc- coated halloysite nanotubes-Ag-chitosan oligosaccharide lactate.

Authors:  Ahmed Humayun; Yangyang Luo; Anusha Elumalai; David K Mills
Journal:  Mater Technol (N Y N Y)       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.297

6.  Mineralizing Coating on 3D Printed Scaffolds for the Promotion of Osseointegration.

Authors:  Abshar Hasan; Romain Bagnol; Robert Owen; Arsalan Latif; Hassan M Rostam; Sherif Elsharkawy; Felicity R A J Rose; José Carlos Rodríguez-Cabello; Amir M Ghaemmaghami; David Eglin; Alvaro Mata
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-27

7.  Promoting Endothelial Cell Affinity and Antithrombogenicity of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) by Mussel-Inspired Modification and RGD/Heparin Grafting.

Authors:  Hao-Yang Mi; Xin Jing; James A Thomsom; Lih-Sheng Turng
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 6.331

8.  Enhanced osteogenesis of 3D printed β-TCP scaffolds with Cissus Quadrangularis extract-loaded polydopamine coatings.

Authors:  Samuel F Robertson; Susmita Bose
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-07-04

Review 9.  Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Sumit Kumar; Rahul Pandey; Aman Mahajan; Deepti Nandana; Dhirendra S Katti; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-11-05

Review 10.  Tissue Engineering Through 3D Bioprinting to Recreate and Study Bone Disease.

Authors:  Adriene Pavek; Christopher Nartker; Maamoon Saleh; Matthew Kirkham; Sana Khajeh Pour; Ali Aghazadeh-Habashi; Jared J Barrott
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.