Literature DB >> 29498576

3D printing and intraoperative neuronavigation tailoring for skull base reconstruction after extended endoscopic endonasal surgery: proof of concept.

Walid I Essayed1, Prashin Unadkat2, Ahmed Hosny3, Sarah Frisken2, Marcio S Rassi1, Srinivasan Mukundan2, James C Weaver4, Ossama Al-Mefty1, Alexandra J Golby1,2, Ian F Dunn1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic endonasal approaches are increasingly performed for the surgical treatment of multiple skull base pathologies. Preventing postoperative CSF leaks remains a major challenge, particularly in extended approaches. In this study, the authors assessed the potential use of modern multimaterial 3D printing and neuronavigation to help model these extended defects and develop specifically tailored prostheses for reconstructive purposes.
METHODS: Extended endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches were performed on 3 human cadaveric heads. Pre-Preprocedure and intraprocedure CT scans were completed and were used to segment and design extended and tailored skull base models. Multimaterial models with different core/edge interfaces were 3D printed for implantation trials. A novel application of the intraoperative landmark acquisition method was used to transfer the navigation, helping to tailor the extended models.
RESULTS: Prostheses were created based on preoperative and intraoperative CT scans. The navigation transfer offered sufficiently accurate data to tailor the preprinted extended skull base defect prostheses. Successful implantation of the skull base prostheses was achieved in all specimens. The progressive flexibility gradient of the models’ edges offered the best compromise for easy intranasal maneuverability, anchoring, and structural stability. Prostheses printed based on intraprocedure CT scans were accurate in shape but slightly undersized.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative 3D printing of patient-specific skull base models is achievable for extended endoscopic endonasal surgery. The careful spatial modeling and the use of a flexibility gradient in the design helped achieve the most stable reconstruction. Neuronavigation can help tailor preprinted prostheses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D; endoscopic; extended endonasal surgery; neuronavigation; printing; prostheses and implants; reconstructive surgical procedures; skull base reconstruction; surgical technique

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29498576      PMCID: PMC6119650          DOI: 10.3171/2017.9.JNS171253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  40 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence.

Authors:  Richard J Harvey; Priscilla Parmar; Raymond Sacks; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Endoscopic repair of high-flow cranial base defects using a bilayer button.

Authors:  Adam J Luginbuhl; Peter G Campbell; James Evans; Marc Rosen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  SOFT ROBOTICS. A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion.

Authors:  Nicholas W Bartlett; Michael T Tolley; Johannes T B Overvelde; James C Weaver; Bobak Mosadegh; Katia Bertoldi; George M Whitesides; Robert J Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Efficacy of Perioperative Lumbar Drainage following Endonasal Endoscopic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repair.

Authors:  Omar H Ahmed; Sonya Marcus; Jenna R Tauber; Binhuan Wang; Yixin Fang; Richard A Lebowitz
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Materials with Potential Application in Preprosthetic Surgery.

Authors:  Mina D Fahmy; Hossein E Jazayeri; Mehdi Razavi; Radi Masri; Lobat Tayebi
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Comparison of 3D-Printed Poly-ɛ-Caprolactone Scaffolds Functionalized with Tricalcium Phosphate, Hydroxyapatite, Bio-Oss, or Decellularized Bone Matrix<sup/>.

Authors:  Ethan Nyberg; Alexandra Rindone; Amir Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  The endoscopic endonasal approach for extradural and intradural clivus lesions.

Authors:  Eduardo de Arnaldo Silva Vellutini; Leonardo Balsalobre; Diego Rodrigo Hermann; Aldo Cassol Stamm
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 9.  Endoscopic endonasal transclival resection of chordomas: operative technique, clinical outcome, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Justin F Fraser; Gurston G Nyquist; Nicholas Moore; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Performance of degradable composite bone repair products made via three-dimensional fabrication techniques.

Authors:  Tithi Dutta Roy; Joshua L Simon; John L Ricci; E Dianne Rekow; Van P Thompson; J Russell Parsons
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Technology and Applications of 3D Printing in the Medical Field.

Authors:  Neil J Mardis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

2.  3D-Printed Disease Models for Neurosurgical Planning, Simulation, and Training.

Authors:  Chul-Kee Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Application of 3D printed model for planning the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Xing Huang; Ni Fan; Hai-Jun Wang; Yan Zhou; Xudong Li; Xiao-Bing Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.