Chunling Liu1, Kun Wang2, Queenie Chan3, Zaiyi Liu1, Jine Zhang1, Hui He1, Shuixing Zhang1, Changhong Liang4. 1. Department of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, GuangZhou, China, 510080. 2. Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong General Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, GuangZhou, China, 510080. 3. Philips Healthcare, 6/F, Core Building 1, 1 Science Park East Avenue, Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, GuangZhou, China, 510080. cjr.lchh@vip.163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnostic performance for breast lesions by quantitative parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to explore whether correlations exist between these parameters. METHODS: IVIM and DCE MRI were performed on a 1.5-T MRI scanner in patients with suspicious breast lesions. Thirty-six breast cancers and 23 benign lesions were included in the study. Quantitative parameters from IVIM (D, f and D*) and DCE MRI (Ktrans, Kep, Ve and Vp) were calculated and compared between malignant and benign lesions. Spearman correlation test was used to evaluate correlations between them. RESULTS: D, f, D* from IVIM and Ktrans, Kep, Vp from DCE MRI were statistically different between breast cancers and benign lesions (p < 0.05, respectively) and D demonstrated the largest area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.917) and had the highest specificity (83 %). The f value was moderately statistically correlated with Vp (r = 0.692) and had a poor correlation with Ktrans (r = 0.456). CONCLUSIONS: IVIM MRI is useful in the differentiation of breast lesions. Significant correlations were found between perfusion-related parameters from IVIM and DCE MRI. IVIM may be a useful adjunctive tool to standard MRI in diagnosing breast cancer. KEY POINTS: • IVIM provided diffusion as well as perfusion information • IVIM could help differential diagnosis of breast lesions • Correlations were found between perfusion-related parameters from IVIM and DCE MRI.
OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnostic performance for breast lesions by quantitative parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to explore whether correlations exist between these parameters. METHODS: IVIM and DCE MRI were performed on a 1.5-T MRI scanner in patients with suspicious breast lesions. Thirty-six breast cancers and 23 benign lesions were included in the study. Quantitative parameters from IVIM (D, f and D*) and DCE MRI (Ktrans, Kep, Ve and Vp) were calculated and compared between malignant and benign lesions. Spearman correlation test was used to evaluate correlations between them. RESULTS: D, f, D* from IVIM and Ktrans, Kep, Vp from DCE MRI were statistically different between breast cancers and benign lesions (p < 0.05, respectively) and D demonstrated the largest area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.917) and had the highest specificity (83 %). The f value was moderately statistically correlated with Vp (r = 0.692) and had a poor correlation with Ktrans (r = 0.456). CONCLUSIONS: IVIM MRI is useful in the differentiation of breast lesions. Significant correlations were found between perfusion-related parameters from IVIM and DCE MRI. IVIM may be a useful adjunctive tool to standard MRI in diagnosing breast cancer. KEY POINTS: • IVIM provided diffusion as well as perfusion information • IVIM could help differential diagnosis of breast lesions • Correlations were found between perfusion-related parameters from IVIM and DCE MRI.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast neoplasm; DCE MRI; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Intravoxel incoherent motion; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Z Xiao; Z Tang; J Qiang; S Wang; W Qian; Y Zhong; R Wang; J Wang; L Wu; W Tang; Z Zhang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Maren M Sjaastad Andreassen; Lauren K Fang; Christopher C Conlin; Helen H Park; Grace S Ahn; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Igor Vidić; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Anne M Wallace; Michael Hahn; Tyler M Seibert; Neil Peter Jerome; Agnes Østlie; Tone Frost Bathen; Pål Erik Goa; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Anders M Dale Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Gene Y Cho; Lucas Gennaro; Elizabeth J Sutton; Emily C Zabor; Zhigang Zhang; Dilip Giri; Linda Moy; Daniel K Sodickson; Elizabeth A Morris; Eric E Sigmund; Sunitha B Thakur Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2017-08-18