Literature DB >> 26863189

Structural basis for promiscuous PAM recognition in type I-E Cascade from E. coli.

Robert P Hayes1, Yibei Xiao1, Fran Ding1, Paul B G van Erp2, Kanagalaghatta Rajashankar3, Scott Bailey4, Blake Wiedenheft2, Ailong Ke1.   

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and the cas (CRISPR-associated) operon form an RNA-based adaptive immune system against foreign genetic elements in prokaryotes. Type I accounts for 95% of CRISPR systems, and has been used to control gene expression and cell fate. During CRISPR RNA (crRNA)-guided interference, Cascade (CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defence) facilitates the crRNA-guided invasion of double-stranded DNA for complementary base-pairing with the target DNA strand while displacing the non-target strand, forming an R-loop. Cas3, which has nuclease and helicase activities, is subsequently recruited to degrade two DNA strands. A protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence flanking target DNA is crucial for self versus foreign discrimination. Here we present the 2.45 Å crystal structure of Escherichia coli Cascade bound to a foreign double-stranded DNA target. The 5'-ATG PAM is recognized in duplex form, from the minor groove side, by three structural features in the Cascade Cse1 subunit. The promiscuity inherent to minor groove DNA recognition rationalizes the observation that a single Cascade complex can respond to several distinct PAM sequences. Optimal PAM recognition coincides with wedge insertion, initiating directional target DNA strand unwinding to allow segmented base-pairing with crRNA. The non-target strand is guided along a parallel path 25 Å apart, and the R-loop structure is further stabilized by locking this strand behind the Cse2 dimer. These observations provide the structural basis for understanding the PAM-dependent directional R-loop formation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26863189      PMCID: PMC5134256          DOI: 10.1038/nature16995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  33 in total

1.  Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system.

Authors:  Kirill A Datsenko; Ksenia Pougach; Anton Tikhonov; Barry L Wanner; Konstantin Severinov; Ekaterina Semenova
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Directional R-Loop Formation by the CRISPR-Cas Surveillance Complex Cascade Provides Efficient Off-Target Site Rejection.

Authors:  Marius Rutkauskas; Tomas Sinkunas; Inga Songailiene; Maria S Tikhomirova; Virginijus Siksnys; Ralf Seidel
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Crystal Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishimasu; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; F Ann Ran; Bernd Zetsche; Yinqing Li; Arisa Kurabayashi; Ryuichiro Ishitani; Feng Zhang; Osamu Nureki
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  In vitro reconstitution of Cascade-mediated CRISPR immunity in Streptococcus thermophilus.

Authors:  Tomas Sinkunas; Giedrius Gasiunas; Sakharam P Waghmare; Mark J Dickman; Rodolphe Barrangou; Philippe Horvath; Virginijus Siksnys
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  John van der Oost; Edze R Westra; Ryan N Jackson; Blake Wiedenheft
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Mechanism of foreign DNA selection in a bacterial adaptive immune system.

Authors:  Dipali G Sashital; Blake Wiedenheft; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  In vitro reconstitution of an Escherichia coli RNA-guided immune system reveals unidirectional, ATP-dependent degradation of DNA target.

Authors:  Sabin Mulepati; Scott Bailey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Structures of the RNA-guided surveillance complex from a bacterial immune system.

Authors:  Blake Wiedenheft; Gabriel C Lander; Kaihong Zhou; Matthijs M Jore; Stan J J Brouns; John van der Oost; Jennifer A Doudna; Eva Nogales
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Two distinct DNA binding modes guide dual roles of a CRISPR-Cas protein complex.

Authors:  Timothy R Blosser; Luuk Loeff; Edze R Westra; Marnix Vlot; Tim Künne; Małgorzata Sobota; Cees Dekker; Stan J J Brouns; Chirlmin Joo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Repurposing endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas systems for programmable gene repression.

Authors:  Michelle L Luo; Adam S Mullis; Ryan T Leenay; Chase L Beisel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  71 in total

1.  Type III-A CRISPR-Cas Csm Complexes: Assembly, Periodic RNA Cleavage, DNase Activity Regulation, and Autoimmunity.

Authors:  Ning Jia; Charlie Y Mo; Chongyuan Wang; Edward T Eng; Luciano A Marraffini; Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Structure Studies of the CRISPR-Csm Complex Reveal Mechanism of Co-transcriptional Interference.

Authors:  Lilan You; Jun Ma; Jiuyu Wang; Daria Artamonova; Min Wang; Liang Liu; Hua Xiang; Konstantin Severinov; Xinzheng Zhang; Yanli Wang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Structure basis for RNA-guided DNA degradation by Cascade and Cas3.

Authors:  Yibei Xiao; Min Luo; Adam E Dolan; Maofu Liao; Ailong Ke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cas1 and the Csy complex are opposing regulators of Cas2/3 nuclease activity.

Authors:  MaryClare F Rollins; Saikat Chowdhury; Joshua Carter; Sarah M Golden; Royce A Wilkinson; Joseph Bondy-Denomy; Gabriel C Lander; Blake Wiedenheft
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  RNA activation-independent DNA targeting of the Type III CRISPR-Cas system by a Csm complex.

Authors:  Kwang-Hyun Park; Yan An; Tae-Yang Jung; In-Young Baek; Haemin Noh; Woo-Chan Ahn; Hans Hebert; Ji-Joon Song; Jeong-Hoon Kim; Byung-Ha Oh; Eui-Jeon Woo
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Structure Basis for Directional R-loop Formation and Substrate Handover Mechanisms in Type I CRISPR-Cas System.

Authors:  Yibei Xiao; Min Luo; Robert P Hayes; Jonathan Kim; Sherwin Ng; Fang Ding; Maofu Liao; Ailong Ke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  High-Throughput Characterization of Cascade type I-E CRISPR Guide Efficacy Reveals Unexpected PAM Diversity and Target Sequence Preferences.

Authors:  Becky Xu Hua Fu; Michael Wainberg; Anshul Kundaje; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Reconstitution and biochemical characterization of ribonucleoprotein complexes in Type I-E CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  Yibei Xiao; Ailong Ke
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Massively Parallel Biophysical Analysis of CRISPR-Cas Complexes on Next Generation Sequencing Chips.

Authors:  Cheulhee Jung; John A Hawkins; Stephen K Jones; Yibei Xiao; James R Rybarski; Kaylee E Dillard; Jeffrey Hussmann; Fatema A Saifuddin; Cagri A Savran; Andrew D Ellington; Ailong Ke; William H Press; Ilya J Finkelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Structure Reveals Mechanisms of Viral Suppressors that Intercept a CRISPR RNA-Guided Surveillance Complex.

Authors:  Saikat Chowdhury; Joshua Carter; MaryClare F Rollins; Sarah M Golden; Ryan N Jackson; Connor Hoffmann; Lyn'Al Nosaka; Joseph Bondy-Denomy; Karen L Maxwell; Alan R Davidson; Elizabeth R Fischer; Gabriel C Lander; Blake Wiedenheft
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.