Literature DB >> 26860409

[Importance of mechanical assist devices in acute circulatory arrest].

Markus Wolfgang Ferrari1.   

Abstract

Mechanical assist devices are indicated for hemodynamic stabilization in acute circulatory arrest if conventional means of cardiopulmonary resuscitation are unable to re-establish adequate organ perfusion. Their temporary use facilitates further diagnostic and therapeutic options in selected patients, e.g. coronary angiography followed by revascularization.External thorax compression devices allow sufficient cardiac massage in case of preclinical or in-hospital circulatory arrest, especially under complex transfer conditions. These devices perform standardized thorax compressions at a rate of 80-100 per minute. Invasive mechanical support devices are used in the catheter laboratory or in the intensive care unit. Axial turbine pumps, e.g. the Impella, continuously pump blood from the left ventricle into the aortic root. The Impella can also provide right ventricle support by pumping blood from the vena cava into the pulmonary artery. So-called emergency systems or ECMO devices consist of a centrifugal pump and a membrane oxygenator allowing complete takeover of cardiac and pulmonary functions. Withdrawing blood from the right atrium and vena cava, oxygenated blood is returned to the abdominal aorta. Isolated centrifugal pumps provide left heart support without an oxygenator after transseptal insertion of a venous cannula into the left atrium.Mechanical assist devices are indicated for acute organ protection and hemodynamic stabilization for diagnostic and therapeutic measures as well as bridge to myocardial recovery. Future technical developments and better insights into the pathophysiology of mechanical circulatory support will broaden the spectrum of indications of such devices in acute circulatory arrest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiogenic shock; Mechanical circulatory support; Multi-organ failure; Thorax compression devices

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26860409     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-016-0421-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  17 in total

1.  Closed-chest cardiac massage.

Authors:  W B KOUWENHOVEN; J R JUDE; G G KNICKERBOCKER
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1960-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Impact of Pulsatility and Flow Rates on Hemodynamic Energy Transmission in an Adult Extracorporeal Life Support System.

Authors:  Rachel Wolfe; Ashton Strother; Shigang Wang; Allen R Kunselman; Akif Ündar
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Assessment of outcomes and differences between in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Eisuke Kagawa; Ichiro Inoue; Takuji Kawagoe; Masaharu Ishihara; Yuji Shimatani; Satoshi Kurisu; Yasuharu Nakama; Kazuoki Dai; Otani Takayuki; Hiroki Ikenaga; Yoshimasa Morimoto; Kentaro Ejiri; Nozomu Oda
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kevin J Morine; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-01

5.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Antoinette de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Bernward Lauer; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Karl Werdan; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  An insight into short- and long-term mechanical circulatory support systems.

Authors:  Markus Ferrari; Peter Kruzliak; Kyriakos Spiliopoulos
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Extracorporeal life support and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a nationwide registry: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Dong Sun Choi; Taeyun Kim; Young Sun Ro; Ki Ok Ahn; Eui Jung Lee; Seung Sik Hwang; Sung Wook Song; Kyoung Jun Song; Sang Do Shin
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Better outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation using percutaneous emergency circulatory support in non-coronary patients compared to those with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Markus Ferrari; Khosro Hekmat; Christian Jung; Katharina Ferrari-Kuehne; Ruediger Pfeifer; Markus H Schlosser; Gerald S Werner; Hans R Figulla
Journal:  Acute Card Care       Date:  2011-02-16

9.  Unsuccessful emergency medical resuscitation--are continued efforts in the emergency department justified?

Authors:  W A Gray; R J Capone; A S Most
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pulmonary and left ventricular decompression by artificial pulmonary valve incompetence during percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support in cardiac arrest.

Authors:  K H Scholz; H R Figulla; T Schröder; J P Hering; H Bock; M Ferrari; H Kreuzer; G Hellige
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  M W Ferrari
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 0.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.