| Literature DB >> 26857940 |
Federico Picollo1,2,3, Alfio Battiato1,2,3, Ettore Bernardi1,2,3, Marilena Plaitano2, Claudio Franchino3,4, Sara Gosso3,4, Alberto Pasquarelli5, Emilio Carbone3,4, Paolo Olivero1,2,3, Valentina Carabelli3,4.
Abstract
We report on the ion beam fabrication of all-carbon multi electrode arrays (MEAs) based on 16 graphitic micro-channels embedded in single-crystal diamond (SCD) substrates. The fabricated SCD-MEAs are systematically employed for the in vitro simultaneous amperometric detection of the secretory activity from populations of chromaffin cells, demonstrating a new sensing approach with respect to standard techniques. The biochemical stability and biocompatibility of the SCD-based device combined with the parallel recording of multi-electrodes array allow: i) a significant time saving in data collection during drug screening and/or pharmacological tests over a large number of cells, ii) the possibility of comparing altered cell functionality among cell populations, and iii) the repeatition of acquisition runs over many cycles with a fully non-toxic and chemically robust bio-sensitive substrate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26857940 PMCID: PMC4746641 DOI: 10.1038/srep20682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Deep ion beam lithography of synthetic diamond.
(a) Vacancy density profile induced by 1.2 MeV He+ ions implanted in diamond at a fluence of 1.5 × 1017 cm−2. The horizontal line indicates the graphitization threshold, while the patterned rectangle highlights the thickness of the graphitic layer formed upon thermal annealing. Schematics (not to scale) of the fabrication a sub-superficial graphitic channel: three-dimensional view of the masked diamond (b), zoom of three-dimensional (c) and cross-sectional (d) view of a single channel with emerging end-points. The lateral features of the electrode are defined by the aperture in the non-contact mask (in gray), while its depth profile is defined by the contact variable-thickness metallic mask (in yellow).
Figure 2SCD-MEA layout.
(a) Picture of the sensor mounted on the acquisition electronic board. (b) Optical micrograph of the diamond sample soldered on the chip carrier. (c) Optical transmission micrograph of living chromaffin cells cultured on top of a SCD-MEA. Chromaffin cells cover most of the available microelectrodes. The emerging endpoints of the graphitic channels (i.e. the surface electrodes) are circled in red and sub-superficial insulated graphitic path are highlighted with blue dashed lines. (d) Optical transmission micrograph of a living chromaffin cell in close proximity to the active region of a microelectrode. The emerging endpoint of the graphitic channel is highlighted with red solid lines while the sub-superficial insulated graphitic path is highlighted with blue dashed lines.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammetry characterization.
Cyclic voltammetric scans at 20 mV s−1 rate of a −0.5 ÷ 1.1 V ramp voltage applied to all microelectrodes with respect to the quasi-reference Ag/AgCl electrode in the presence of Tyrode buffer (solid black lines) and 100 mM adrenaline solution (solid red lines). All electrodes show the characteristic features of water oxidation at a voltage higher then +0.850 V, while detecting the oxidation of adrenaline at voltages between +500 mV and +800 mV, with the exception of electrode #2.
Figure 4Exocytic events recordings from chromaffin cells.
Typical chrono-amperogrametric recordings from individual cultured chromaffin cells positioned in close proximity to the respective graphitic electrodes after stimulation with a KCl-enriched solution. Amperograms were collected simultaneously by the 16 electrodes polarized at +800 mV bias with respect to the quasi-reference electrode. In the bottom right, details of the signals detected by electrode #9 are shown at increasing time scale magnification. In the green rectangle, a single amperometric spike is clearly anticipated by a “foot” current associated with the opening and expansion of the fusion pore.
Figure 5Q parameter analysis.
(a) Recorded charge Q over the different electrodes of the 2 SCD-MEAs; each datapoint represents the average value of the charge measured from the spikes recorded from an electrode during a measurement run, while the uncertainty bar is given by the standard error of the relevant dataset. (b) cubic root charge histogram distribution fitted by a double Gaussian function: the peaks position are (1.01 ± 0.05) pC1/3 and (1.34 ± 0.09) pC1/3, respectively.
Mean values and relevant uncertainties of the main parameters describing the amperometric spikes recorded with the SCD-MEA, as compared with corresponding values obtained by: i) CFEs on chromaffin cells cultured on a diamond plate, ii) single cells positioned by patch-clamp pipette on the electrodes the SCD-MEA and iii) literature3034.
| Imax(pA) | Q (pC) | Q1/3 (pC1/3) | tm(ms) | m (nA s−1) | tp (ms) | # spikes | # cell | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCD-MEA: cultured cells | 74 ± 5 | 1.56 ± 0.09 | 1.06 ± 0.02 | 17.0 ± 0.7 | 21 ± 2 | 8.3 ± 0.4 | 3003 | 70 |
| CFE (cultured cells on diamond plate) | 82 ± 13 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 0.97 ± 0.05 | 17.2 ± 1.6 | 33 ± 6 | 8.0 ± 0.8 | 495 | 14 |
| SCD-MEA: single cell | 99 ± 23 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.10 ± 0.04 | 14.3 ± 1.5 | 40 ± 13 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 307 | 10 |
| Literature | 73 ± 3 | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 1.06 § ± 0.04 | 16.0 ± 0.5 | 24.2 ± 1.1 | 18.2 ± 1.0 | 778 | 12 |