Literature DB >> 26857925

The association of psychosocial screening and service provision in pediatric oncology: the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0) into clinical practice.

M C McCarthy1,2, S DeGraves3, C E Wakefield4,5, M J Bowden6, L V Marks6, L K Williams6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Distress screening in oncology has been widely endorsed in recent years. However, current knowledge of the impact of screening on delivery of clinical psychosocial services is limited. This study investigated the association between screening and psychosocial services in the early period following diagnosis of childhood cancer.
METHODS: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0) was administered by clinical social workers in two pediatric oncology centers shortly following diagnosis. Psychosocial service activity in the first 8 weeks post diagnosis was collected via social work surveys and extraction of information from hospital databases.
RESULTS: PAT2.0 and psychosocial service data were obtained for 89 families with a child newly diagnosed with cancer. Distribution of PAT2.0 risk categories was consistent with previous studies (57.3 % universal, 38.2 % targeted, 4.5 % clinical). Significant, weak to moderate correlations between PAT2.0 and social workers' estimates of psychosocial risk were observed. No significant differences in the amount of psychosocial services provided to families with "universal" versus "elevated" (i.e., targeted or clinical) risk were found. Number of days in hospital was strongly and positively associated with the amount of psychosocial services families received in the first 8 weeks following diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial risk, as measured by the PAT2.0, and allocation of psychosocial services were not significantly associated in the early period following diagnosis. Further investigation is required to understand if differences emerge over time when psychosocial screening is implemented clinically. Development of clinical pathways of care needs to account for patients who may predominantly be treated in the outpatient setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childhood cancer; Distress; Pediatric oncology; Psychosocial; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26857925     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3107-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  17 in total

1.  Emotional distress: the sixth vital sign in cancer care.

Authors:  Barry D Bultz; Linda E Carlson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Removing the stress from selecting instruments: arming social workers to take leadership in routine distress screening implementation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

3.  Family psychosocial risk screening guided by the Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM) using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT).

Authors:  Anne E Kazak; Stephanie Schneider; Stephen Didonato; Ahna L H Pai
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0_General: validity of a psychosocial risk screener in a pediatric kidney transplant sample.

Authors:  Ahna L H Pai; Alayna Tackett; Richard F Ittenbach; Jens Goebel
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2011-12-22

5.  Identifying psychosocial risk indicative of subsequent resource use in families of newly diagnosed pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Anne E Kazak; M Catherine Cant; Merritt M Jensen; Mary McSherry; Mary T Rourke; Wei-Ting Hwang; Melissa A Alderfer; David Beele; Steven Simms; Beverly J Lange
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Measuring psychosocial risk in families caring for a child with cancer: the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0).

Authors:  Maria C McCarthy; Naomi E Clarke; Alasdair Vance; David M Ashley; John A Heath; Vicki A Anderson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  External validity and reliability of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) among Canadian parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer.

Authors:  M Barrera; K Hancock; A Rokeach; D Cataudella; E Atenafu; D Johnston; A Punnett; P C Nathan; U Bartels; M Silva; M Cassidy; P Jansen; W Shama; C Greenberg
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Family psychosocial risk, distress, and service utilization in pediatric cancer: predictive validity of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Melissa A Alderfer; Ifigenia Mougianis; Lamia P Barakat; David Beele; Susan DiTaranto; Wei-Ting Hwang; Anne T Reilly; Anne E Kazak
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  From distress guidelines to developing models of psychosocial care: current best practices.

Authors:  Paul G Clark; Sage Bolte; Joanne Buzaglo; Mitch Golant; Louisa Daratsos; Matthew Loscalzo
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

10.  Distress screening: an opportunity for enhancing quality cancer care and promoting the oncology social work profession.

Authors:  Brad Zebrack; Mary Ann Burg; Virginia Vaitones
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012
View more
  4 in total

1.  Healthcare provider utility ratings of a psychosocial screening summary: from diagnosis to 6 months.

Authors:  Leandra Desjardins; Laurel Etkin-Spigelman; Kelly Hancock; Joanna Chung; Wendy Shama; Denise Mills; Sarah Alexander; Maru Barrera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Screening for caregiver psychosocial risk in children with medical complexity: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rahul Verma; Yasna Mehdian; Neel Sheth; Kathy Netten; Jean Vinette; Ashley Edwards; Joanna Polyviou; Julia Orkin; Reshma Amin
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2020-07-27

3.  First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care.

Authors:  Sasja A Schepers; Simone M Sint Nicolaas; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Elisabeth M van Dijk-Lokkart; Esther M M van den Bergh; Nienke de Boer; Chris M Verhaak; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Implementation of family psychosocial risk assessment in pediatric cancer with the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT): study protocol for a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Anne E Kazak; Janet A Deatrick; Michele A Scialla; Eric Sandler; Rebecca E Madden; Lamia P Barakat
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 7.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.