Literature DB >> 23101546

Distress screening: an opportunity for enhancing quality cancer care and promoting the oncology social work profession.

Brad Zebrack1, Mary Ann Burg, Virginia Vaitones.   

Abstract

Throughout its history, social work has played a critical role in major client/patient care initiatives because of its unique perspective, wisdom, and skills. The new screening standards set forth by the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer place oncology social workers at the forefront of developing and implementing procedures for distress screening. Our profession is again challenged to work across disciplines and change systems of care to improve the health and welfare of patients with cancer and their families. Indeed, emerging research suggests that the use of psychosocial screening instruments results in reductions in emotional distress, better quality of life, and improved patient-provider communication. As an introduction to this special issue on distress screening, this article offers a brief overview of issues related to distress screening that are covered by papers authored in this special issue by Association of Oncology Social Work members. Topics addressed include a review of the historical context driving distress screening implementation, barriers and challenges to oncology social workers trying to implement distress screening, statistical and cultural considerations for selecting screening tools, best practice models, and future considerations. This special issue is intended to be a primer and serves to promote oncology social workers' involvement and leadership in the development and implementation of distress screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23101546     DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2012.721485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol        ISSN: 0734-7332


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of functional outcomes in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Marita Stier-Jarmer; Carla Sabariego; Alarcos Cieza; Ulrich Harréus; Uta Tschiesner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Healthcare provider utility ratings of a psychosocial screening summary: from diagnosis to 6 months.

Authors:  Leandra Desjardins; Laurel Etkin-Spigelman; Kelly Hancock; Joanna Chung; Wendy Shama; Denise Mills; Sarah Alexander; Maru Barrera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  ExCEL in Social Work: Excellence in Cancer Education & Leadership: An Oncology Social Work Response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine Report.

Authors:  Shirley Otis-Green; Barbara Jones; Brad Zebrack; Lisa Kilburn; Terry A Altilio; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The effects of multi-disciplinary psycho-social care on socio-economic problems in cancer patients: a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Susanne Singer; Julia Roick; Jürgen Meixensberger; Franziska Schiefke; Susanne Briest; Andreas Dietz; Kirsten Papsdorf; Joachim Mössner; Thomas Berg; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Dietger Niederwieser; Annette Keller; Anette Kersting; Helge Danker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Attending to Distress as part of quality, comprehensive cancer care: Gaps and Diversity Considerations.

Authors:  Kimlin Tam Ashing; Matt Loscalzo; Linda Burhansstipanov; Judy Huei-Yu Wang; Anna Napoles
Journal:  Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care       Date:  2016-01-14

6.  Use of a self-reported psychosocial distress screening tool as a predictor of need for psychosocial intervention in a general medical setting.

Authors:  Schuyler C Cunningham; Jeasmine Aizvera; Paul Wakim; Lisa Felber
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2018-02-20

7.  The Distress Thermometer in Spanish cancer patients: convergent validity and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Paula Martínez; María José Galdón; Yolanda Andreu; Elena Ibáñez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The association of psychosocial screening and service provision in pediatric oncology: the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0) into clinical practice.

Authors:  M C McCarthy; S DeGraves; C E Wakefield; M J Bowden; L V Marks; L K Williams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Quality of life amongst lymphoma survivors in a developing country.

Authors:  Diana L C Ng; Y C Leong; Gin Gin Gan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  The effect of treatment and coping on the quality of life in breast cancer patients: a moderated mediation model.

Authors:  Lorena Gutiérrez-Hermoso; Lilian Velasco-Furlong; Sofía Sánchez-Román; Elisabeth Berzal-Pérez; Natasha Alcocer-Castillejos; Paulina Quiroz-Friedman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.