| Literature DB >> 26855670 |
Alexandru Dumitrache1, Hannah Akinosho2, Miguel Rodriguez1, Xianzhi Meng3, Chang Geun Yoo4, Jace Natzke1, Nancy L Engle1, Robert W Sykes5, Timothy J Tschaplinski1, Wellington Muchero1, Arthur J Ragauskas6, Brian H Davison1, Steven D Brown1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Higher ratios of syringyl-to-guaiacyl (S/G) lignin components of Populus were shown to improve sugar release by enzymatic hydrolysis using commercial blends. Cellulolytic microbes are often robust biomass hydrolyzers and may offer cost advantages; however, it is unknown whether their activity can also be significantly influenced by the ratio of different monolignol types in Populus biomass. Hydrolysis and fermentation of autoclaved, but otherwise not pretreated Populus trichocarpa by Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 was compared using feedstocks that had similar carbohydrate and total lignin contents but differed in S/G ratios.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium thermocellum; Consolidated bioprocessing; Guaiacyl; Lignin; Molecular weight; Populus; S/G ratio; Syringyl
Year: 2016 PMID: 26855670 PMCID: PMC4743434 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0445-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Top The three primary monolignols (from left to right) that form H, G, and S lignin units (respectively) and the most common linkage in the lignin polymer, the β-O-4 ether bond (right-most); Bottom highly resistant 5-5 (left) and β-5 (right) lignin linkages facilitated by the G unit
Fig. 2Bioconversion screening through time-course-weight loss measurements in batch fermentations with C. thermocellum ATCC 27405 at 5 g/L (dry basis) initial biomass loadings. Mean values and standard deviations are shown for triplicate fermentations
Fig. 3A 2.9-fold ethanol yield increase in the consolidated bioprocessing of high S/G Populus biomass over the low S/G variant (top); biomass-derived acetate (below, dotted line) measured in un-inoculated bioreactor controls and total acetate measured in CBP bioreactors (below, solid line)—fermentative acetate is approximately the difference between these two series. Mean values and standard deviations are shown for triplicate fermentations
Fig. 4Sugar content per gram solid in low S/G (left) and high S/G (right) Populus before and after consolidated bioprocessing. Mean values and standard deviations are shown for solids of triplicate fermentations
Fig. 5Glucose release and subsequent yeast fermentation to ethanol in separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) of the low and high S/G Populus. Mean values and standard deviations are shown for triplicate fermentations
Time-course GC–MS metabolome analysis of CBP bioconversions; aqueous concentrations (mg/L) and the fold change (low S/G to high S/G) of potential biomass-derived inhibitors
| Metabolite | 0 h | 71 h | 140 h | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low S/G | High S/G | Fold change | Low S/G | High S/G | Fold change | Low S/G | High S/G | Fold change | |
|
| 1.28 | 0.14 |
| 4.54 | 0.56 |
| 6.82 | 1.09 |
|
| 4-Hydroxyphenethyl alcohol | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| 0.26 | 0.77 |
| 0.46 | 1.73 |
|
| 11.64 347 | 0.38 | 0.16 |
| 4.62 | 0.97 |
| 8.23 | 1.74 |
|
| 11.00 218 100 | 2.13 | 0.55 |
| 5.16 | 1.28 |
| 4.20 | 1.30 |
|
| 10.92 218 100 277 | 3.38 | 1.08 |
| 9.32 | 3.71 |
| 7.73 | 2.41 |
|
| 14.90 Guaiacyl lignan | 1.33 | 0.36 |
| 1.15 | 0.36 |
| 0.72 | 0.28 |
|
| 14.96 Guaiacyl lignan | 2.30 | 0.68 |
| 2.27 | 0.81 |
| 1.67 | 0.70 |
|
| Guaiacylglycerol | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| 0.10 | 0.05 |
| 0.09 | 0.05 |
|
| 15.52 Syringyl lignan | 0.09 | 0.17 |
| 0.12 | 0.25 |
| 0.13 | 0.28 |
|
| 15.44 Syringyl lignan | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| 0.05 | 0.10 |
| 0.04 | 0.10 |
|
| Syringylglycerol | 0.09 | 0.09 | 1.04 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 1.09 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.92 |
Italicized values: higher in the Low S/G poplar bioconversion; Italicized underlined values: higher in the High S/G poplar bioconversion
Only metabolites released with greater than two-fold difference between the low and high S/G phenotypes are shown (with the exception of syringyl glycerol). Numerical labels for unidentified metabolites are denoted by retention time and key mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios
Fig. 6CBP fermentations of the high S/G Populus phenotype with additions of potential inhibitor p-hydroxybenzoic acid showed no significant effect on metabolic output. The compound was added to the culture medium in quantities that produced final concentrations close to onefold and tenfold the concentrations found in the low S/G cultures. Mean values and standard deviations are shown for triplicate fermentations
Fig. 7Cellulose number-average degree of polymerization (DPn) for “low S/G” and “high S/G” Populus, before and after CBP bioconversion. In both phenotypes, cellulose chain length increased slightly after fermentation; however, differences in cellulose properties between the two feedstock are not particularly significant (left); the ratio of crystalline to amorphous cellulose showed no significant differences between the two Populus phenotypes (right)
Fig. 8Lignin molecular weights (M w) are notably larger in the high S/G Populus wood before and after CBP conversion (left); the direct orange dye adsorption, determined by modified Simons’ staining, revealed better cellulose accessibility in the high S/G Populus phenotypes before and after fermentation (right)