Literature DB >> 26855089

Cervical Cancer Screening.

George F Sawaya1, Karen Smith-McCune.   

Abstract

Recent changes in cervical cancer screening and management guidelines reflect our evolving knowledge about cervical carcinogenesis. In the pursuit of precision, however, decision-making has become complicated. We provide an overview of cervical cancer screening with a focus on what clinicians can do to maximize screening benefits while minimizing screening harms. The approach relies on categorizing women at each step in the screening process by their estimated risk of high-grade precancerous lesions and cervical cancer. Current screening guidelines are designed to find a reasonable balance between benefits and harms by recommending less screening in most women. Current management guidelines are designed to assure consistent decisions regarding referral to colposcopy. After initial colposcopy, we outline three major management options based on risk assessment. For treatment, we recommend ablational procedures when appropriate because they are similarly effective, less costly, and potentially safer than excisional procedures. We advise caution in adopting new screening strategies until they demonstrate cost-effective patient-centered improvements compared with current strategies. Clinicians can maximize their effect on cervical cancer prevention by being attentive to guidelines, assuring that women have access to appropriate human papillomavirus vaccination and providing low-cost, high-quality screening and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855089      PMCID: PMC6585413          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention in 78 Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics-United States, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Emily McGinnis; Beth E Meyerson; Elissa Meites; Mona Saraiya; Rebecca Griesse; Emily Snoek; Laura Haderxhanaj; Lauri E Markowitz; William Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Strategies to reach marginalized women for cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  B Wood; A Lofters; M Vahabi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  George F Sawaya; Megan J Huchko
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 4.  Cervical cancer and potential pharmacological treatment with snake venoms.

Authors:  Alejandro Montoya-Gómez; Leonel Montealegre-Sánchez; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo; Eliécer Jiménez-Charris
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Assessment of the effectiveness of HPV16/18 infection referred for colposcopy in cervical cancer screening in Northwest of China.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Minyi Zhao; Di Cao; Xing Wei; Li Wang; Yang Li; Ting Yang; Juan Zhao; Meili Pei; Hongran Jia; Siyu Cao; Shimin Quan; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.327

Review 6.  Viruses and Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Sara Becerril; Roberto Corchado-Cobos; Natalia García-Sancha; Leonor Revelles; David Revilla; Tatiana Ugalde; Concepción Román-Curto; Jesús Pérez-Losada; Javier Cañueto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-magnetic resonance hybrid imaging: An emerging tool for staging of cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Alina Nazir; Robert Matthews; Annapurneswara Rao Chimpiri; Melissa Henretta; Joyce Varughese; Dinko Franceschi
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-08-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.