Literature DB >> 28577624

Cervical Cancer Screening.

George F Sawaya1, Megan J Huchko2.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening in the United States has accompanied profound decreases in cancer incidence and mortality over the last half century. Two screening strategies are currently endorsed by US-based guideline groups: (1) triennial cytology for women aged 21 to 65 years, and (2) triennial cytology for women aged 21 to 29 years followed by cytology plus testing for high-risk human papillomavirus types every 5 years for women aged 30 years and older. Providing women with affordable, easily accessible screening, follow-up of abnormal tests, and timely treatment will result in the greatest impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer prevention; Cervical cancer screening; Cervical cytology; High-value care; Human papillomavirus testing; Human papillomavirus vaccination; Preterm birth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28577624      PMCID: PMC6585416          DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Clin North Am        ISSN: 0025-7125            Impact factor:   5.456


  44 in total

1.  Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study.

Authors:  M H Stoler; M Schiffman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kyrgiou; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; M Arbyn; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology in primary screening of women younger than 35 years: results at recruitment for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Guglielmo Ronco; Paolo Giorgi-Rossi; Francesca Carozzi; Paolo Dalla Palma; Annarosa Del Mistro; Laura De Marco; Margherita De Lillo; Carlo Naldoni; Paola Pierotti; Raffaella Rizzolo; Nereo Segnan; Patrizia Schincaglia; Manuel Zorzi; Massimo Confortini; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of self collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus compared to clinician collected human papillomavirus specimens: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G S Ogilvie; D M Patrick; M Schulzer; J W Sellors; M Petric; K Chambers; R White; J M FitzGerald
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Thomas C Wright; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; William F Lawrence; Sharita Mizell Womack; Denise Jacobson; Bin Yi; Yi-ting Hwang; Karen Gold; James Barter; Keerti Shah
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Current cervical neoplasia screening practices of obstetrician/gynecologists in the US.

Authors:  Mona Saint; Ginny Gildengorin; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 years or more.

Authors:  Sue J Goldie; Jane J Kim; Thomas C Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination.

Authors:  Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Natasha K Stout; Joshua A Salomon; Karen M Kuntz; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Cervical cancer screening among women without a cervix.

Authors:  Brenda E Sirovich; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Trends in High-grade Cervical Lesions and Cervical Cancer Screening in 5 States, 2008-2015.

Authors:  Julia Warner Gargano; Ina U Park; Marie R Griffin; Linda M Niccolai; Melissa Powell; Nancy M Bennett; Michelle L Johnson Jones; Erin Whitney; Manideepthi Pemmaraju; Monica Brackney; Nasreen Abdullah; Mary Scahill; Rebecca M Dahl; Angela A Cleveland; Elizabeth R Unger; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Cervix Type and Cervical Cancer Classification System Using Deep Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Lidiya Wubshet Habtemariam; Elbetel Taye Zewde; Gizeaddis Lamesgin Simegn
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  PBX3 is associated with proliferation and poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hongfang Li; Gaogao Sun; Chang Liu; Jing Wang; Rong Jing; Jie Wang; Xiaohuan Zhao; Xiaoyan Xu; Yongxiu Yang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The value of cytokine levels in triage and risk prediction for women with persistent high-risk human papilloma virus infection of the cervix.

Authors:  Bohan Li; Ling Zhang; Jianguo Zhao; Guichun Tan; Wenwen Zhang; Na Zhang; Jing Tian; Pengpeng Qu
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.965

5.  Efficacy of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for cervical cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Chun-Yan Zheng; Jin-Hui Cao; Shu-Ling Luo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.