Literature DB >> 26854196

Sequential monitoring of Phase I dose expansion cohorts.

Alexia Iasonos1, John O'Quigley2.   

Abstract

A relatively recent development in the design of Phase I dose-finding studies is the inclusion of expansion cohort(s), that is, the inclusion of several more patients at a level considered to be the maximum tolerated dose established at the conclusion of the 'pure' Phase I part. Little attention has been given to the additional statistical analysis, including design considerations, that we might wish to consider for this more involved design. For instance, how can we best make use of new information that may confirm or may tend to contradict the estimate of the maximum tolerated dose based on the dose escalation phase. Those patients included during the dose expansion phase may possess different eligibility criteria. During the expansion phase, we will also wish to have an eye on any evidence of efficacy, an aspect that clearly distinguishes such studies from the classical Phase I study. Here, we present a methodology that enables us to continue the monitoring of safety in the dose expansion cohort while simultaneously trying to assess efficacy and, in particular, which disease types may be the most promising to take forward for further study. The most elementary problem is where we only wish to take account of further toxicity information obtained during the dose expansion cohort, and where the initial design was model based or the standard 3+3. More complex set-ups also involve efficacy and the presence of subgroups.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phase I trials; dose expansion; dose finding; sequential probability ratio test; sequential test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26854196      PMCID: PMC4976081          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  17 in total

1.  Dose-finding designs for HIV studies.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M D Hughes; T Fenton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; L Z Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.901

4.  BAYESIAN PHASE I/II ADAPTIVELY RANDOMIZED ONCOLOGY TRIALS WITH COMBINED DRUGS.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Phase I dose-escalation study of intravenous aflibercept in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Nicolas Isambert; Gilles Freyer; Sylvie Zanetta; Benoît You; Pierre Fumoleau; Claire Falandry; Laure Favier; Sylvie Assadourian; Karen Soussan-Lazard; Samira Ziti-Ljajic; Veronique Trillet-Lenoir
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Clinical trials: Early phase clinical trials-are dose expansion cohorts needed?

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Dose expansion cohorts in Phase I trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 1.452

9.  A statistical framework for quantile equivalence clinical trials with application to pharmacokinetic studies that bridge from HIV-infected adults to children.

Authors:  Lixia Pei; Michael D Hughes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.

Authors:  Kristen Cunanan; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  5 in total

1.  Statistical justification of expansion cohorts in phase 1 cancer trials.

Authors:  Ali A Mokdad; Xian-Jin Xie; Hong Zhu; David E Gerber; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Phase I clinical trials in adoptive T-cell therapies.

Authors:  Sean M Devlin; Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 1.680

3.  Dimension of model parameter space and operating characteristics in adaptive dose-finding studies.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway; Ken Cheung; Ying Yuan; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Dose expansion cohorts in Phase I trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 1.452

5.  How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Graham M Wheeler; Adrian P Mander; Alun Bedding; Kristian Brock; Victoria Cornelius; Andrew P Grieve; Thomas Jaki; Sharon B Love; Lang'o Odondi; Christopher J Weir; Christina Yap; Simon J Bond
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.