Literature DB >> 27516848

Dose expansion cohorts in Phase I trials.

Alexia Iasonos1, John O'Quigley2.   

Abstract

A rapidly increasing number of Phase I dose-finding studies, and in particular those based on the standard 3+3 design, are being prolonged with the inclusion of dose expansion cohorts (DEC) in order to better characterize the toxicity profiles of experimental agents and to study disease-specific cohorts. These trials consist of two phases: the usual dose escalation phase that aims to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose expansion phase that accrues additional patients, often with different eligibility criteria, and where additional information is collected. Current protocols do not always specify whether and how the MTD will be updated in light of the new data accumulated from the DEC. In this paper, we propose methods that allow monitoring of safety in the DEC by re-evaluating the MTD in light of additional information. Our working assumption is that, regardless of the design being used for dose escalation, during the DEC we are experimenting in the neighborhood of a target dose with an acceptable rate of toxicity. We refine our initial estimate of the MTD by continuing experimentation in the immediate vicinity of the initial estimate of the MTD. The auxiliary information provided in such an evaluation can include toxicity, pharmacokinetic, efficacy or other endpoints. We consider approaches specifically focused on the aims of DEC that examine efficacy alone or simultaneously with safety and compare the proposed tests via simulations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phase I trials; average sample number; dose expansion; dose finding; sequential monitoring

Year:  2016        PMID: 27516848      PMCID: PMC4976787          DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2015.1135185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res        ISSN: 1946-6315            Impact factor:   1.452


  20 in total

1.  Dose-finding designs for HIV studies.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M D Hughes; T Fenton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.

Authors:  X Paoletti; A Kramar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; L Z Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  BAYESIAN PHASE I/II ADAPTIVELY RANDOMIZED ONCOLOGY TRIALS WITH COMBINED DRUGS.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Sequential monitoring of Phase I dose expansion cohorts.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Bivariate isotonic design for dose-finding with ordered groups.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Kai Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Continual reassessment method vs. traditional empirically based design: modifications motivated by Phase I trials in pediatric oncology by the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.

Authors:  Arzu Onar; Mehmet Kocak; James M Boyett
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  A statistical framework for quantile equivalence clinical trials with application to pharmacokinetic studies that bridge from HIV-infected adults to children.

Authors:  Lixia Pei; Michael D Hughes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.

Authors:  Kristen Cunanan; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  9 in total

1.  Integrating the escalation and dose expansion studies into a unified Phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Sequential monitoring of Phase I dose expansion cohorts.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Continual reassessment method with regularization in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Anastasia Ivanova; Hong Tian; Pilar Lim; Kevin Liu
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Motivating sample sizes in adaptive Phase I trials via Bayesian posterior credible intervals.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.701

5.  Design considerations for early-phase clinical trials of immune-oncology agents.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Cody Chiuzan; Katherine S Panageas
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 13.751

6.  Innovation in Regulatory Science Is Meeting Evolution of Clinical Evidence Generation.

Authors:  Myrto Lee; Hoan Ly; Clemens C Möller; Michael S Ringel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Graham M Wheeler; Adrian P Mander; Alun Bedding; Kristian Brock; Victoria Cornelius; Andrew P Grieve; Thomas Jaki; Sharon B Love; Lang'o Odondi; Christopher J Weir; Christina Yap; Simon J Bond
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Perspectives for the Use of CAR-T Cells for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Marcin Jasiński; Grzegorz W Basak; Wiesław W Jedrzejczak
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Optimizing the Therapeutic Window of Targeted Drugs in Oncology: Potency-Guided First-in-Human Studies.

Authors:  Matthew J Goldstein; Malte Peters; Barbara L Weber; Charles B Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.689

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.