OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of potential dose savings by implementing adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) on a gemstone-based scintillator in a clinical 64-row whole-body CT (WBCT) protocol after multiple trauma. METHODS: Dose reports of 152 WBCT scans were analysed for two 64-row multidetector CT scanners (Scanners A and B); the main scanning parameters were kept constant. ASiR and a gemstone-based scintillator were used in Scanner B, and the noise index was adjusted (head: 5.2 vs 6.0; thorax/abdomen: 29.0 vs 46.0). The scan length, CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP) were analysed. The estimated mean effective dose was calculated using normalized conversion factors. Student's t-test was used for statistics. RESULTS: Both the mean CTDI (mGy) (Scanner A: 53.8 ± 2.0, 10.3 ± 2.5, 14.4 ± 3.7; Scanner B: 48.7 ± 2.2, 7.1 ± 2.3, 9.1 ± 3.6; p < 0.001, respectively) and the mean DLP (mGy cm) (Scanner A: 1318.9 ± 167.8, 509.3 ± 134.7, 848.8 ± 254.0; Scanner B: 1190.6 ± 172.6, 354.6 ± 128.3, 561.0 ± 246.7; p < 0.001, respectively) for the head, thorax and abdomen were significantly reduced with Scanner B. There was no relevant difference in scan length. The total mean effective dose (mSv) was significantly decreased with Scanner B (24.4 ± 6.0, 17.2 ± 5.8; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The implementation of ASiR and a gemstone-based scintillator allows for significant dose savings in a clinical WBCT protocol. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Recent technical developments can significantly reduce radiation dose of WBCT in multiple trauma. Dose reductions of 10-34% can be achieved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of potential dose savings by implementing adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) on a gemstone-based scintillator in a clinical 64-row whole-body CT (WBCT) protocol after multiple trauma. METHODS: Dose reports of 152 WBCT scans were analysed for two 64-row multidetector CT scanners (Scanners A and B); the main scanning parameters were kept constant. ASiR and a gemstone-based scintillator were used in Scanner B, and the noise index was adjusted (head: 5.2 vs 6.0; thorax/abdomen: 29.0 vs 46.0). The scan length, CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP) were analysed. The estimated mean effective dose was calculated using normalized conversion factors. Student's t-test was used for statistics. RESULTS: Both the mean CTDI (mGy) (Scanner A: 53.8 ± 2.0, 10.3 ± 2.5, 14.4 ± 3.7; Scanner B: 48.7 ± 2.2, 7.1 ± 2.3, 9.1 ± 3.6; p < 0.001, respectively) and the mean DLP (mGy cm) (Scanner A: 1318.9 ± 167.8, 509.3 ± 134.7, 848.8 ± 254.0; Scanner B: 1190.6 ± 172.6, 354.6 ± 128.3, 561.0 ± 246.7; p < 0.001, respectively) for the head, thorax and abdomen were significantly reduced with Scanner B. There was no relevant difference in scan length. The total mean effective dose (mSv) was significantly decreased with Scanner B (24.4 ± 6.0, 17.2 ± 5.8; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The implementation of ASiR and a gemstone-based scintillator allows for significant dose savings in a clinical WBCT protocol. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Recent technical developments can significantly reduce radiation dose of WBCT in multiple trauma. Dose reductions of 10-34% can be achieved.
Authors: Yoshiko Sagara; Amy K Hara; William Pavlicek; Alvin C Silva; Robert G Paden; Qing Wu Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jörg Bayer; Gregor Pache; Peter C Strohm; Jörn Zwingmann; Philipp Blanke; Tobias Baumann; Norbert P Südkamp; Thorsten Hammer Journal: J Trauma Date: 2011-04
Authors: Stefan Huber-Wagner; Rolf Lefering; Lars-Mikael Qvick; Markus Körner; Michael V Kay; Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian Reiser; Wolf Mutschler; Karl-Georg Kanz Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stefan Wirth; Julian Hebebrand; Raffaella Basilico; Ferco H Berger; Ana Blanco; Cem Calli; Maureen Dumba; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Fabian Mück; Konraad H Nieboer; Mariano Scaglione; Marc-André Weber; Elizabeth Dick Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2020-12-10
Authors: Thomas Westermaier; Thomas Linsenmann; György A Homola; Mario Loehr; Christian Stetter; Nadine Willner; Ralf-Ingo Ernestus; Laszlo Solymosi; Giles H Vince Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: Carlos Ordoñez; Carlos García; Michael W Parra; Edison Angamarca; Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez; Claudia P Orlas; Juan Pablo Herrera-Escobar; Erika Rincón; Juan José Meléndez; Jose Julián Serna; Natalia Padilla; Ana Milena Del Valle; Alberto F García; Alfonso Holguín Journal: Colomb Med (Cali) Date: 2020-03-30
Authors: Dirk Stengel; Sven Mutze; Claas Güthoff; Moritz Weigeldt; Konrad von Kottwitz; Domenique Runge; Filip Razny; Anna Lücke; Dirk Müller; Axel Ekkernkamp; Thomas Kahl Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 14.766