BACKGROUND: The decision to continue medical therapy or recommend endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) can be challenging in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The objective of this study was to evaluate continued medical therapy vs ESS for patients with refractory CRS who have severe reductions in baseline disease-specific quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal crossover study between August 2011 and June 2013. All patients were >18 years old, diagnosed with CRS based on guideline recommendations, failed initial medical therapy and elected ESS. While waiting for ESS, all patients received continued medical therapy. The preoperative waiting period outcomes (continued medical therapy) were compared to the postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome was change in disease-specific QoL (22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test [SNOT-22]). Secondary outcomes were change in endoscopic grading (Lund-Kennedy score), medication consumption, and work days missed in the preceding 90 days. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Mean baseline SNOT-22 score was 57.6. After a mean of 7.1 months of continued medical therapy, there was a worsening in SNOT-22 score (57.6 to 66.1; p = 0.006). After ESS, with a mean postoperative follow-up of 14.6 months, there was a significant improvement in SNOT-22 score (66.1 to 16.0; p < 0.001). There was also a significant improvement in endoscopic grading (p < 0.001) coupled with a reduction in both work days lost (p < 0.001) and medication consumption (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Results from the study suggest that ESS is a more effective intervention compared to continued medical therapy for patients with refractory CRS who have severe reductions in their baseline disease-specific QoL.
BACKGROUND: The decision to continue medical therapy or recommend endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) can be challenging in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The objective of this study was to evaluate continued medical therapy vs ESS for patients with refractory CRS who have severe reductions in baseline disease-specific quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal crossover study between August 2011 and June 2013. All patients were >18 years old, diagnosed with CRS based on guideline recommendations, failed initial medical therapy and elected ESS. While waiting for ESS, all patients received continued medical therapy. The preoperative waiting period outcomes (continued medical therapy) were compared to the postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome was change in disease-specific QoL (22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test [SNOT-22]). Secondary outcomes were change in endoscopic grading (Lund-Kennedy score), medication consumption, and work days missed in the preceding 90 days. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Mean baseline SNOT-22 score was 57.6. After a mean of 7.1 months of continued medical therapy, there was a worsening in SNOT-22 score (57.6 to 66.1; p = 0.006). After ESS, with a mean postoperative follow-up of 14.6 months, there was a significant improvement in SNOT-22 score (66.1 to 16.0; p < 0.001). There was also a significant improvement in endoscopic grading (p < 0.001) coupled with a reduction in both work days lost (p < 0.001) and medication consumption (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Results from the study suggest that ESS is a more effective intervention compared to continued medical therapy for patients with refractory CRS who have severe reductions in their baseline disease-specific QoL.
Authors: Luke Rudmik; Zachary M Soler; Richard R Orlandi; Michael G Stewart; Neil Bhattacharyya; David W Kennedy; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2011-10-29 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Timothy L Smith; Robert C Kern; James N Palmer; Rodney J Schlosser; Rakesh K Chandra; Alexander G Chiu; David Conley; Jess C Mace; Rongwei F Fu; James A Stankiewicz Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2011-06-06 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Luke Rudmik; Monica Hoy; Rodney J Schlosser; Richard J Harvey; Kevin C Welch; Valerie Lund; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Zachary M Soler; Samuel L Oyer; Robert C Kern; Brent A Senior; Stilianos E Kountakis; Bradley F Marple; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: David M Poetker; Luke A Jakubowski; Devyani Lal; Peter H Hwang; Erin D Wright; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Timothy L Smith; Jamie R Litvack; Peter H Hwang; Todd A Loehrl; Jess C Mace; Karen J Fong; Kenneth E James Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Thiago Freire Pinto Bezerra; Jay F Piccirillo; Marco Aurelio Fornazieri; Renata Ribeiro de Mendonça Pilan; Fabio de Rezende Pinna; Francini Grecco de Melo Padua; Richard Louis Voegels Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2012-04
Authors: Sarah Tait; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jasmina Suko; Sara Kukuljan; John Schneider; Jay F Piccirillo Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Toby O Steele; Luke Rudmik; Jess C Mace; Adam S DeConde; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 3.858