Literature DB >> 17761281

Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis.

Richard M Rosenfeld1, David Andes, Neil Bhattacharyya, Dickson Cheung, Steven Eisenberg, Theodore G Ganiats, Andrea Gelzer, Daniel Hamilos, Richard C Haydon, Patricia A Hudgins, Stacie Jones, Helene J Krouse, Lawrence H Lee, Martin C Mahoney, Bradley F Marple, Col John P Mitchell, Robert Nathan, Richard N Shiffman, Timothy L Smith, David L Witsell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on managing sinusitis, defined as symptomatic inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. Sinusitis affects 1 in 7 adults in the United States, resulting in about 31 million individuals diagnosed each year. Since sinusitis almost always involves the nasal cavity, the term rhinosinusitis is preferred. The guideline target patient is aged 18 years or older with uncomplicated rhinosinusitis, evaluated in any setting in which an adult with rhinosinusitis would be identified, monitored, or managed. This guideline is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and manage adults with sinusitis.
PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve diagnostic accuracy for adult rhinosinusitis, reduce inappropriate antibiotic use, reduce inappropriate use of radiographic imaging, and promote appropriate use of ancillary tests that include nasal endoscopy, computed tomography, and testing for allergy and immune function. In creating this guideline the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of allergy, emergency medicine, family medicine, health insurance, immunology, infectious disease, internal medicine, medical informatics, nursing, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, pulmonology, and radiology.
RESULTS: The panel made strong recommendations that 1) clinicians should distinguish presumed acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) from acute rhinosinusitis caused by viral upper respiratory infections and noninfectious conditions, and a clinician should diagnose ABRS when (a) symptoms or signs of acute rhinosinusitis are present 10 days or more beyond the onset of upper respiratory symptoms, or (b) symptoms or signs of acute rhinosinusitis worsen within 10 days after an initial improvement (double worsening), and 2) the management of ABRS should include an assessment of pain, with analgesic treatment based on the severity of pain. The panel made a recommendation against radiographic imaging for patients who meet diagnostic criteria for acute rhinosinusitis, unless a complication or alternative diagnosis is suspected. The panel made recommendations that 1) if a decision is made to treat ABRS with an antibiotic agent, the clinician should prescribe amoxicillin as first-line therapy for most adults, 2) if the patient worsens or fails to improve with the initial management option by 7 days, the clinician should reassess the patient to confirm ABRS, exclude other causes of illness, and detect complications, 3) clinicians should distinguish chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and recurrent acute rhinosinusitis from isolated episodes of ABRS and other causes of sinonasal symptoms, 4) clinicians should assess the patient with CRS or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis for factors that modify management, such as allergic rhinitis, cystic fibrosis, immunocompromised state, ciliary dyskinesia, and anatomic variation, 5) the clinician should corroborate a diagnosis and/or investigate for underlying causes of CRS and recurrent acute rhinosinusitis, 6) the clinician should obtain computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses in diagnosing or evaluating a patient with CRS or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis, and 7) clinicians should educate/counsel patients with CRS or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis regarding control measures. The panel offered as options that 1) clinicians may prescribe symptomatic relief in managing viral rhinosinusitis, 2) clinicians may prescribe symptomatic relief in managing ABRS, 3) observation without use of antibiotics is an option for selected adults with uncomplicated ABRS who have mild illness (mild pain and temperature <38.3 degrees C or 101 degrees F) and assurance of follow-up, 4) the clinician may obtain nasal endoscopy in diagnosing or evaluating a patient with CRS or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis, and 5) the clinician may obtain testing for allergy and immune function in evaluating a patient with CRS or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis. DISCLAIMER: This clinical practice guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance for managing adults with rhinosinusitis. Rather, it is designed to assist clinicians by providing an evidence-based framework for decision-making strategies. It is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all individuals with this condition, and may not provide the only appropriate approach to diagnosing and managing this problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17761281     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.06.726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  249 in total

1.  Analysis of factors associated with electing endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus culture in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Zi Zhang; Nithin D Adappa; Ebbing Lautenbach; Alexander G Chiu; Laurel J Doghramji; Noam A Cohen; James N Palmer
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.858

3.  Low-stage computed tomography chronic rhinosinusitis: what is the role of endoscopic sinus surgery?

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Jess Mace; Timothy Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  GEM at 10: a decade's experience with the Guideline Elements Model.

Authors:  Negin Hajizadeh; Nitu Kashyap; George Michel; Richard N Shiffman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

5.  In this issue: from communities of solution to joy.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  The contribution of flexible endoscopy for diagnosis of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Gilead Berger; Rachel L Berger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Appropriateness criteria predict outcomes for sinus surgery and may aid in future patient selection.

Authors:  Daniel M Beswick; Jess C Mace; Zachary M Soler; Noel F Ayoub; Luke Rudmik; Adam S DeConde; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  High rates of detection of respiratory viruses in the nasal washes and mucosae of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Gye Song Cho; Byung-Jae Moon; Bong-Jae Lee; Chang-Hoon Gong; Nam Hee Kim; You-Sun Kim; Hun Sik Kim; Yong Ju Jang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  The impact of comorbid migraine on quality-of-life outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  The impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Amal Hajjij; Jess C Mace; Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith; Peter H Hwang
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.