AIMS: Several clinical trials have confirmed the therapeutic benefit of imipenem for treatment of lung infections. There is however no knowledge of the penetration of imipenem into the lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF), the site of action relevant for lung infections. Furthermore, although the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of imipenem has been widely studied, most studies have been based on selected patient groups. The aim of this analysis was to characterize imipenem plasma PK across populations and to quantify imipenem ELF penetration. METHODS: A population model for imipenem plasma PK was developed using data obtained from healthy volunteers, elderly subjects and subjects with renal impairment, in order to identify predictors for inter-individual variability (IIV) of imipenem PK. Subsequently, a clinical study which measured plasma and ELF concentrations of imipenem was included in order to quantify lung penetration. RESULTS: A two compartmental model best described the plasma PK of imipenem. Creatinine clearance and body weight were included as subject characteristics predictive for IIV on clearance. Typical estimates for clearance, central and peripheral volume, and inter-compartmental clearance were 11.5 l h(-1) , 9.37 l, 6.41 l, 13.7 l h(-1) , respectively (relative standard error (RSE) <8%). The distribution of imipenem into ELF was described using a time-independent penetration coefficient of 0.44 (RSE 14%). CONCLUSION: The identified lung penetration coefficient confirms the clinical relevance of imipenem for treatment of lung infections, while the population PK model provided insights into predictors of IIV for imipenem PK and may be of relevance to support dose optimization in various subject groups.
AIMS: Several clinical trials have confirmed the therapeutic benefit of imipenem for treatment of lung infections. There is however no knowledge of the penetration of imipenem into the lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF), the site of action relevant for lung infections. Furthermore, although the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of imipenem has been widely studied, most studies have been based on selected patient groups. The aim of this analysis was to characterize imipenem plasma PK across populations and to quantify imipenem ELF penetration. METHODS: A population model for imipenem plasma PK was developed using data obtained from healthy volunteers, elderly subjects and subjects with renal impairment, in order to identify predictors for inter-individual variability (IIV) of imipenem PK. Subsequently, a clinical study which measured plasma and ELF concentrations of imipenem was included in order to quantify lung penetration. RESULTS: A two compartmental model best described the plasma PK of imipenem. Creatinine clearance and body weight were included as subject characteristics predictive for IIV on clearance. Typical estimates for clearance, central and peripheral volume, and inter-compartmental clearance were 11.5 l h(-1) , 9.37 l, 6.41 l, 13.7 l h(-1) , respectively (relative standard error (RSE) <8%). The distribution of imipenem into ELF was described using a time-independent penetration coefficient of 0.44 (RSE 14%). CONCLUSION: The identified lung penetration coefficient confirms the clinical relevance of imipenem for treatment of lung infections, while the population PK model provided insights into predictors of IIV for imipenem PK and may be of relevance to support dose optimization in various subject groups.
Authors: Pyry A J Välitalo; Koen Griffioen; Matthew L Rizk; Sandra A G Visser; Meindert Danhof; Gaori Rao; Piet H van der Graaf; J G Coen van Hasselt Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: J G Coen van Hasselt; Anubha Gupta; Ziad Hussein; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Emmanuel Boselli; Dominique Breilh; Sarah Djabarouti; Christian Guillaume; Thomas Rimmelé; Jean-Baptiste Gordien; Fabien Xuereb; Marie-Claude Saux; Bernard Allaouchiche Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-05-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Matthew L Rizk; Elizabeth G Rhee; Patricia A Jumes; Mark H Gotfried; Tian Zhao; Eric Mangin; Sheng Bi; Cynthia M Chavez-Eng; Zufei Zhang; Joan R Butterton Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: J G Coen van Hasselt; Matthew L Rizk; Mallika Lala; Cynthia Chavez-Eng; Sandra A G Visser; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof; Gauri Rao; Piet H van der Graaf Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Ana Motos; Joseph L Kuti; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Antoni Torres; David P Nicolau Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Linda B S Aulin; Pyry A Valitalo; Matthew L Rizk; Sandra A G Visser; Gauri Rao; Piet H van der Graaf; J G Coen van Hasselt Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Matthew L Rizk; Elizabeth G Rhee; Patricia A Jumes; Mark H Gotfried; Tian Zhao; Eric Mangin; Sheng Bi; Cynthia M Chavez-Eng; Zufei Zhang; Joan R Butterton Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Matthijs D Kruizinga; Willem A J Birkhoff; Michiel J van Esdonk; Naomi B Klarenbeek; Tomasz Cholewinski; Tessa Nelemans; Melloney J Dröge; Adam F Cohen; Rob G J A Zuiker Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 4.335