Literature DB >> 27198625

Evaluating renal function and age as predictors of amikacin clearance in neonates: model-based analysis and optimal dosing strategies.

Sílvia M Illamola1,2,3, Helena Colom3, J G Coen van Hasselt4.   

Abstract

AIMS: We aimed to compare the performance of renal function and age as predictors of inter-individual variability (IIV) in clearance of amikacin in neonates through parallel development of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models and their associated impact on optimal dosing regimens.
METHODS: Amikacin concentrations were retrospectively collected for 149 neonates receiving amikacin (post-natal age (PNA) between 4-89 days). Two population PK models were developed in parallel, considering at least as predictors current body weight (WT), in combination with either creatinine clearance (CLcr ) or age descriptors. Using stochastic simulations for both renal function or age-based dosing, we identified optimal dosing strategies that were based on attainment of optimal peak- (PCC) and trough target concentration coverage (TCC) windows associated with efficacy and toxicity.
RESULTS: The CLcr and age-based population PK models both included current body weight (WT) on CL, central distribution volume and intercompartmental clearance, in combination with either CLcr or PNA as predictors for IIV of clearance (CL). The WT-CLcr model explained 6.9% more IIV in CL compared with the WT-PNA model. Both models successfully described an external dataset (n = 53) of amikacin PK. The simulation analysis of optimal dose regimens suggested similar performance of either CLcr or PNA based dosing.
CONCLUSION: CLcr predicted more IIV in CL, but did not translate into clinically relevant improvements of target concentrations. Our optimized dose regimens can be considered for further evaluation to optimize initial treatment with amikacin.
© 2016 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amikacin; dosing guidelines; modelling and simulation; paediatric clinical pharmacology; population pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27198625      PMCID: PMC5338126          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  27 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of amikacin and validation on neonates using Monte Carlo method.

Authors:  J Wang; W Q Liang; J J Wu; C M Pan
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Prediction discrepancies for the evaluation of nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  France Mentré; Sylvie Escolano
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-11-13       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Handling data below the limit of quantification in mixed effect models.

Authors:  Martin Bergstrand; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  A size standard for pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  N H Holford
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in premature Malaysian neonates: identification of predictors for dosing determination.

Authors:  Yoke-Lin Lo; Johan G C van Hasselt; Siow-Chin Heng; Chin-Theam Lim; Toong-Chow Lee; Bruce G Charles
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Determination of population pharmacokinetic parameters for amikacin in neonates using mixed-effect models.

Authors:  J H Botha; M J du Preez; R Miller; M Adhikari
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Nonparametric population pharmacokinetic analysis of amikacin in neonates, infants, and children.

Authors:  J M Tréluyer; Y Merlé; S Tonnelier; E Rey; G Pons
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Maturation of the glomerular filtration rate in neonates, as reflected by amikacin clearance.

Authors:  Roosmarijn F W De Cock; Karel Allegaert; Michiel F Schreuder; Catherine M T Sherwin; Matthijs de Hoog; Johannes N van den Anker; Meindert Danhof; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Evaluating renal function and age as predictors of amikacin clearance in neonates: model-based analysis and optimal dosing strategies.

Authors:  Sílvia M Illamola; Helena Colom; J G Coen van Hasselt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  A Risk Assessment of the Jaffe vs Enzymatic Method for Creatinine Measurement in an Outpatient Population.

Authors:  Robert L Schmidt; Joely A Straseski; Kalani L Raphael; Austin H Adams; Christopher M Lehman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates With and Without Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Amy L Nguyen; Peter N Johnson; Stephen B Neely; Kaitlin M Hughes; Kris C Sekar; Robert C Welliver; Jamie L Miller
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-05-19

2.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Sílvia M Illamola; Hoa Q Huynh; Xiaoxi Liu; Zubin N Bhakta; Catherine M Sherwin; Theodore G Liou; Holly Carveth; David C Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Pediatric Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.

Authors:  Sílvia M Illamola; Catherine M Sherwin; J G Coen van Hasselt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Evaluating renal function and age as predictors of amikacin clearance in neonates: model-based analysis and optimal dosing strategies.

Authors:  Sílvia M Illamola; Helena Colom; J G Coen van Hasselt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Amikacin Combined with Fosfomycin for Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis in the Setting of Highly Prevalent Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Christopher A Darlow; Fernando Docobo-Perez; Nicola Farrington; Adam Johnson; Laura McEntee; Jennifer Unsworth; Ana Jimenez-Valverde; Silke Gastine; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Renata M A de Costa; Sally Ellis; François Franceschi; Joseph F Standing; Mike Sharland; Michael Neely; Laura Piddock; Shampa Das; William Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.