Bingjie Wang1, Zhenyong Zhang2, Rajeev K Naidu3, Renyuan Chu1, Jinhui Dai1, Xiaomei Qu1, Zhiqiang Yu1, Hao Zhou4. 1. Key Myopia Laboratory of Chinese Health Ministry, Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No. 83, Fenyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Meiling North Road 409, Shanghai 200062, China. 3. The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia. 4. Key Myopia Laboratory of Chinese Health Ministry, Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No. 83, Fenyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China. Electronic address: zheent@139.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare posterior corneal elevation (PCE) changes and corneal biomechanical changes post fematosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures using the Pentacam system and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series study. METHOD: 106 patients with bilateral myopia who underwent either FS-LASIK (56 patients) or SMILE (50 patients) were reviewed, only the right eye was used in the analysis. Inclusion criteria include a spherical equivalent of -6.00DS and completion of 12 months follow up. The main outcome evaluated was change in PCE at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-operation using the Pentacam system. Corneal biomechanical parameters were evaluated at 6 and 12 months with the ORA. RESULTS: PCE change at 3 and 6 months were not significantly different between the two procedures (p=0.064, p=0.109 respectively). At 12 months, PCE change was greater in FS-LASIK than SMILE (p=0.048). One-way ANOVA showed that for either procedure, the change in PCE did not differ at 3, 6 or 12 months post operation. CH and CRF values were reduced after both procedures, with FS-LASIK demonstrating a greater reduction in CRF than SMILE at 6 and 12 months (p=0.037 and p=0.001). Both CH and CRF reduction correlated with PCE increase at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: FS-LASIK demonstrated a greater increase in PCE than SMILE only at 12 months, as well as a greater reduction of CRF than SMILE. There were no significant differences in PCE change over time within either group.
PURPOSE: To compare posterior corneal elevation (PCE) changes and corneal biomechanical changes post fematosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures using the Pentacam system and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series study. METHOD: 106 patients with bilateral myopia who underwent either FS-LASIK (56 patients) or SMILE (50 patients) were reviewed, only the right eye was used in the analysis. Inclusion criteria include a spherical equivalent of -6.00DS and completion of 12 months follow up. The main outcome evaluated was change in PCE at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-operation using the Pentacam system. Corneal biomechanical parameters were evaluated at 6 and 12 months with the ORA. RESULTS: PCE change at 3 and 6 months were not significantly different between the two procedures (p=0.064, p=0.109 respectively). At 12 months, PCE change was greater in FS-LASIK than SMILE (p=0.048). One-way ANOVA showed that for either procedure, the change in PCE did not differ at 3, 6 or 12 months post operation. CH and CRF values were reduced after both procedures, with FS-LASIK demonstrating a greater reduction in CRF than SMILE at 6 and 12 months (p=0.037 and p=0.001). Both CH and CRF reduction correlated with PCE increase at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: FS-LASIK demonstrated a greater increase in PCE than SMILE only at 12 months, as well as a greater reduction of CRF than SMILE. There were no significant differences in PCE change over time within either group.
Authors: Sana Niazi; Jorge Alio Del Barrio; Azad Sanginabadi; Farideh Doroodgar; Cyrus Alinia; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Feaizollah Niazi; Hossein Mohammad-Rabei; Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi; Jorge L Alio Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 1.779