William Thong1,2, Stefan Parent2, James Wu2, Carl-Eric Aubin1,2, Hubert Labelle2, Samuel Kadoury3,4. 1. Polytechnique Montréal, P.O. Box 6079, Succursale Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3A7, Canada. 2. Sainte-Justine University Hospital Centre, 3175 Cote-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada. 3. Polytechnique Montréal, P.O. Box 6079, Succursale Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3A7, Canada. samuel.kadoury@polymtl.ca. 4. Sainte-Justine University Hospital Centre, 3175 Cote-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada. samuel.kadoury@polymtl.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The classification of three-dimensional (3D) spinal deformities remains an open question in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Recent studies have investigated pattern classification based on explicit clinical parameters. An emerging trend however seeks to simplify complex spine geometries and capture the predominant modes of variability of the deformation. The objective of this study is to perform a 3D characterization and morphology analysis of the thoracic and thoraco/lumbar scoliotic spines (cross-sectional study). The presence of subgroups within all Lenke types will be investigated by analyzing a simplified representation of the geometric 3D reconstruction of a patient's spine, and to establish the basis for a new classification approach based on a machine learning algorithm. METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstructions of coronal and sagittal standing radiographs of 663 patients, for a total of 915 visits, covering all types of deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (single, double and triple curves) and reviewed by the 3D Classification Committee of the Scoliosis Research Society, were analyzed using a machine learning algorithm based on stacked auto-encoders. The codes produced for each 3D reconstruction would be then grouped together using an unsupervised clustering method. For each identified cluster, Cobb angle and orientation of the plane of maximum curvature in the thoracic and lumbar curves, axial rotation of the apical vertebrae, kyphosis (T4-T12), lordosis (L1-S1) and pelvic incidence were obtained. No assumptions were made regarding grouping tendencies in the data nor were the number of clusters predefined. RESULTS: Eleven groups were revealed from the 915 visits, wherein the location of the main curve, kyphosis and lordosis were the three major discriminating factors with slight overlap between groups. Two main groups emerge among the eleven different clusters of patients: a first with small thoracic deformities and large lumbar deformities, while the other with large thoracic deformities and small lumbar curvature. The main factor that allowed identifying eleven distinct subgroups within the surgical patients (major curves) from Lenke type-1 to type-6 curves, was the location of the apical vertebra as identified by the planes of maximum curvature obtained in both thoracic and thoraco/lumbar segments. Both hypokyphotic and hyperkypothic clusters were primarily composed of Lenke 1-4 curve type patients, while a hyperlordotic cluster was composed of Lenke 5 and 6 curve type patients. CONCLUSION: The stacked auto-encoder analysis technique helped to simplify the complex nature of 3D spine models, while preserving the intrinsic properties that are typically measured with explicit parameters derived from the 3D reconstruction.
PURPOSE: The classification of three-dimensional (3D) spinal deformities remains an open question in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Recent studies have investigated pattern classification based on explicit clinical parameters. An emerging trend however seeks to simplify complex spine geometries and capture the predominant modes of variability of the deformation. The objective of this study is to perform a 3D characterization and morphology analysis of the thoracic and thoraco/lumbar scoliotic spines (cross-sectional study). The presence of subgroups within all Lenke types will be investigated by analyzing a simplified representation of the geometric 3D reconstruction of a patient's spine, and to establish the basis for a new classification approach based on a machine learning algorithm. METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstructions of coronal and sagittal standing radiographs of 663 patients, for a total of 915 visits, covering all types of deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (single, double and triple curves) and reviewed by the 3D Classification Committee of the Scoliosis Research Society, were analyzed using a machine learning algorithm based on stacked auto-encoders. The codes produced for each 3D reconstruction would be then grouped together using an unsupervised clustering method. For each identified cluster, Cobb angle and orientation of the plane of maximum curvature in the thoracic and lumbar curves, axial rotation of the apical vertebrae, kyphosis (T4-T12), lordosis (L1-S1) and pelvic incidence were obtained. No assumptions were made regarding grouping tendencies in the data nor were the number of clusters predefined. RESULTS: Eleven groups were revealed from the 915 visits, wherein the location of the main curve, kyphosis and lordosis were the three major discriminating factors with slight overlap between groups. Two main groups emerge among the eleven different clusters of patients: a first with small thoracic deformities and large lumbar deformities, while the other with large thoracic deformities and small lumbar curvature. The main factor that allowed identifying eleven distinct subgroups within the surgical patients (major curves) from Lenke type-1 to type-6 curves, was the location of the apical vertebra as identified by the planes of maximum curvature obtained in both thoracic and thoraco/lumbar segments. Both hypokyphotic and hyperkypothic clusters were primarily composed of Lenke 1-4 curve type patients, while a hyperlordotic cluster was composed of Lenke 5 and 6 curve type patients. CONCLUSION: The stacked auto-encoder analysis technique helped to simplify the complex nature of 3D spine models, while preserving the intrinsic properties that are typically measured with explicit parameters derived from the 3D reconstruction.
Authors: Archana P Sangole; Carl-Eric Aubin; Hubert Labelle; Ian A F Stokes; Lawrence G Lenke; Roger Jackson; Peter Newton Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Edgar García-Cano; Fernando Arámbula Cosío; Luc Duong; Christian Bellefleur; Marjolaine Roy-Beaudry; Julie Joncas; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Thomas G Myers; Prem N Ramkumar; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Kenneth L Urish; Jens Kipper; Constantinos Ketonis Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Alexander L Hornung; Christopher M Hornung; G Michael Mallow; J Nicolás Barajas; Augustus Rush; Arash J Sayari; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-03-27 Impact factor: 2.721