Literature DB >> 26851651

Oral fluid cocaine and benzoylecgonine concentrations following controlled intravenous cocaine administration.

Kayla N Ellefsen1, Marta Concheiro2, Sandrine Pirard3, David A Gorelick4, Marilyn A Huestis5.   

Abstract

Limited oral fluid (OF) pharmacokinetic data collected with commercially available collection devices after controlled cocaine administration hinder OF result interpretations. Ten cocaine-using adults provided OF, collected with Oral-Eze(®) (OE) and StatSure Saliva Sampler™ (SS) devices, an hour prior to and up to 69 h after 25mg intravenous (IV) cocaine administration. Cocaine and benzoylecgonine (BE) were quantified by a validated 2D-GC-MS method. Large inter-subject variability was observed. Cocaine was detected in OF in the first 0.17 h sample after IV administration, with much more rapid elimination than BE. OE observed Cmax median (range) concentrations were 932 (394-1574)μg/L for cocaine and 248 (96.9-953)μg/L for BE. SS observed cocaine and BE Cmax median (range) concentrations trended lower at 732 (83.3-1892)μg/L and 360 (77.2-836)μg/L, respectively. OE and SS cocaine OF detection times were 12.5 and 6.5h and for BE 30.5 and 28.0 h, respectively at 1 μg/L. There were no significant pharmacokinetic differences between OE and SS OF collection devices, except cocaine half-life was significantly shorter in SS OF specimens. This difference could be attributed to differences in stabilizing buffers present in OF collection devices, which may affect cocaine stability in OF specimens, or decreased recovery from collection pads. Both OE and SS OF collection devices were effective in monitoring cocaine and metabolite concentrations with similar detection windows. Furthermore, we demonstrated that different confirmatory OF cutoffs can be selected to produce shorter or longer cocaine and metabolite detection windows to address specific needs of clinical and forensic drug testing programs. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benzoylecgonine; Cocaine; Oral Fluid; Oral-Eze(®); Pharmacokinetics; StatSure Saliva Sampler™

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26851651      PMCID: PMC4761476          DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  27 in total

Review 1.  Oral fluid testing for driving under the influence of drugs: history, recent progress and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Alain G Verstraete
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Driving under the influence of drugs -- evaluation of analytical data of drugs in oral fluid, serum and urine, and correlation with impairment symptoms.

Authors:  Stefan W Toennes; Gerold F Kauert; Stefan Steinmeyer; Manfred R Moeller
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Introduction and review of collection techniques and applications of drug testing of oral fluid.

Authors:  Olaf H Drummer
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Quinine as a potential tracer for medication adherence: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of quinine alone and in combination with oxycodone in humans.

Authors:  Shanna Babalonis; Aidan J Hampson; Michelle R Lofwall; Paul A Nuzzo; Sharon L Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 5.  The potential role of oral fluid in antidoping testing.

Authors:  Sebastien Anizan; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Cocaine and metabolite elimination patterns in chronic cocaine users during cessation: plasma and saliva analysis.

Authors:  E T Moolchan; E J Cone; A Wstadik; M A Huestis; K L Preston
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Effect of repeated cocaine administration on detection times in oral fluid and urine.

Authors:  Rebecca Jufer; Sharon L Walsh; Edward J Cone; Angela Sampson-Cone
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  Impact of oral fluid collection device on cannabinoid stability following smoked cannabis.

Authors:  Sébastien Anizan; Mateus M Bergamaschi; Allan J Barnes; Garry Milman; Nathalie Desrosiers; Dayong Lee; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.345

9.  Cocaine and metabolite concentrations in DBS and venous blood after controlled intravenous cocaine administration.

Authors:  Kayla N Ellefsen; Jose Luiz da Costa; Marta Concheiro; Sebastien Anizan; Allan J Barnes; Sandrine Pirard; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Comparison of drug concentrations between whole blood and oral fluid.

Authors:  Kaarina Langel; Hallvard Gjerde; Donata Favretto; Pirjo Lillsunde; Elisabeth Leere Øiestad; Santo Davide Ferrara; Alain G Verstraete
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.345

View more
  4 in total

1.  Detection of AMA-M2 in human saliva: Potentials in diagnosis and monitoring of primary biliary cholangitis.

Authors:  Chong Lu; Xianliang Hou; Minwei Li; Lin Wang; Ping Zeng; Hongyu Jia; Jianing Chen; Yingfeng Wei; Hong He; Xiangdong Liu; Hongyan Diao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Stability of Cocaine, Opiates, and Metabolites in Dried Saliva Spots.

Authors:  Ema Almeida; Sofia Soares; Joana Gonçalves; Tiago Rosado; Nicolás Fernández; Jesus M Rodilla; Luís A Passarinha; Mário Barroso; Eugenia Gallardo
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Positivity to Cocaine and/or Benzoylecgonine in Confirmation Analyses for On-Road Tests in Spain.

Authors:  Francisco Herrera-Gómez; Eduardo Gutiérrez-Abejón; Mercedes García-Mingo; F Javier Álvarez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context.

Authors:  Stefano Gentili; Renata Solimini; Roberta Tittarelli; Giulio Mannocchi; Francesco Paolo Busardò
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.193

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.