Literature DB >> 26848919

Nonthermal ablation in the rat brain using focused ultrasound and an ultrasound contrast agent: long-term effects.

Nathan McDannold1, Yongzhi Zhang1, Natalia Vykhodtseva1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Thermal ablation with transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) is currently under investigation as a less invasive alternative to radiosurgery and resection. A major limitation of the method is that its use is currently restricted to centrally located brain targets. The combination of FUS and a microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agent greatly reduces the ultrasound exposure level needed to ablate brain tissue and could be an effective means to increase the "treatment envelope" for FUS in the brain. This method, however, ablates tissue through a different mechanism: destruction of the microvasculature. It is not known whether nonthermal FUS ablation in substantial volumes of tissue can safely be performed without unexpected effects. The authors investigated this question by ablating volumes in the brains of normal rats. METHODS Overlapping sonications were performed in rats (n = 15) to ablate a volume in 1 hemisphere per animal. The sonications (10-msec bursts at 1 Hz for 60 seconds; peak negative pressure 0.8 MPa) were combined with the ultrasound contrast agent Optison (100 µl/kg). The rats were followed with MRI for 4-9 weeks after FUS, and the brains were examined with histological methods. RESULTS Two weeks after sonication and later, the lesions appeared as cyst-like areas in T2-weighted MR images that were stable over time. Histological examination demonstrated well-defined lesions consisting of a cyst-like cavity that remained lined by astrocytic tissue. Some white matter structures within the sonicated area were partially intact. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that nonthermal FUS ablation can be used to safely ablate tissue volumes in the brain without unexpected delayed effects. The findings are encouraging for the use of this ablation method in the brain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ETL = echo train length; FOV = field of view; FSE = fast spin echo; FUS = focused ultrasound; H & E = hematoxylin and eosin; LFB = Luxol fast blue; ablation; brain; focused ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26848919      PMCID: PMC4975676          DOI: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  40 in total

1.  A hemisphere array for non-invasive ultrasound brain therapy and surgery.

Authors:  G T Clement; J Sun; T Giesecke; K Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Experimental demonstration of noninvasive transskull adaptive focusing based on prior computed tomography scans.

Authors:  J F Aubry; M Tanter; M Pernot; J L Thomas; M Fink
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Early experiences with ultrasonic irradiation of the pallidofugal and nigral complexes in hyperkinetic and hypertonic disorders.

Authors:  R MEYERS; W J FRY; F J FRY; L L DREYER; D F SCHULTZ; R F NOYES
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Passive cavitation imaging with ultrasound arrays.

Authors:  Vasant A Salgaonkar; Saurabh Datta; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ultrasound insertion loss of rat parietal bone appears to be proportional to animal mass at submegahertz frequencies.

Authors:  Meaghan A O'Reilly; Aidan Muller; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging- guided focused ultrasound surgery of brain tumors: initial findings in 3 patients.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Greg T Clement; Peter Black; Ferenc Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: a rabbit kidney study.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Guoyun Wang; Kai Hu; Ping Ma; Jin Bai; Zhibiao Wang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-12-04

9.  MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Nir Lipsman; Michael L Schwartz; Yuexi Huang; Liesly Lee; Tejas Sankar; Martin Chapman; Kullervo Hynynen; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 44.182

10.  A pilot study of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor.

Authors:  W Jeffrey Elias; Diane Huss; Tiffini Voss; Johanna Loomba; Mohamad Khaled; Eyal Zadicario; Robert C Frysinger; Scott A Sperling; Scott Wylie; Stephen J Monteith; Jason Druzgal; Binit B Shah; Madaline Harrison; Max Wintermark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Intracranial Non-thermal Ablation Mediated by Transcranial Focused Ultrasound and Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Chenguang Peng; Tao Sun; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Chanikarn Power; Yongzhi Zhang; Nathan Mcdannold; Tyrone Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Tyrone Porter
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 4.  The roles of thermal and mechanical stress in focused ultrasound-mediated immunomodulation and immunotherapy for central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Chulyong Kim; Michael Lim; Graeme F Woodworth; Costas D Arvanitis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Microbubble-Enhanced Heating: Exploring the Effect of Microbubble Concentration and Pressure Amplitude on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatments.

Authors:  Alicia Clark; Sierra Bonilla; Dingjie Suo; Yeruham Shapira; Michalakis Averkiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Ultrafast three-dimensional microbubble imaging in vivo predicts tissue damage volume distributions during nonthermal brain ablation.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Dallan McMahon; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 7.  Colloids, nanoparticles, and materials for imaging, delivery, ablation, and theranostics by focused ultrasound (FUS).

Authors:  Adem Yildirim; Nicholas T Blum; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  MR-guided transcranial focused ultrasound safely enhances interstitial dispersion of large polymeric nanoparticles in the living brain.

Authors:  David S Hersh; Pavlos Anastasiadis; Ali Mohammadabadi; Ben A Nguyen; Sijia Guo; Jeffrey A Winkles; Anthony J Kim; Rao Gullapalli; Asaf Keller; Victor Frenkel; Graeme F Woodworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  MRI and histological evaluation of pulsed focused ultrasound and microbubbles treatment effects in the brain.

Authors:  Zsofia I Kovacs; Tsang-Wei Tu; Maggie Sundby; Farhan Qureshi; Bobbi K Lewis; Neekita Jikaria; Scott R Burks; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 11.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.