Literature DB >> 26846218

High Hypnotizability Impairs the Cerebellar Control of Pain.

Tommaso Bocci1, Davide Barloscio1, Laura Parenti1, Ferdinando Sartucci1, Giancarlo Carli2, Enrica L Santarcangelo3.   

Abstract

In the general population, transcranial anodal direct current stimulation of the cerebellum (ctDCS) reduces pain intensity and the amplitude of nociceptive laser evoked potentials (LEPs), whereas cathodal ctDCS elicits opposite effects. Since behavioral findings suggest that the cerebellar activity of highly hypnotizable individuals (highs) differs from the general population, we investigated whether hypnotizability-related differences occur in the modulation of pain by ctDCS. Sixteen healthy highs (according to the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, form A) and 16 participants not selected according to hypnotizability (controls) volunteered to undergo laser nociceptive stimulation of the dorsum of the left hand before and after anodal or cathodal ctDCS. LEPs amplitudes and latencies and the subjective pain experience (Numerical Rating Scale) were analyzed. Smaller LEP amplitudes and longer latencies were observed in highs with respect to controls independently of stimulation. After anodal and cathodal cerebellar stimulation, controls reported lower and higher pain than before it, respectively. In contrast, highs did not report significant changes in the perceived pain after both stimulations. They increased significantly their N2/P2 amplitude after anodal ctDCS and did not exhibit any significant change after cathodal tDCS, whereas controls decreased the N1 and N2P2 amplitude and increased their latency after anodal cerebellar stimulation and did the opposite after cathodal ctDCS. In conclusion, the study showed impaired cerebellar pain modulation and suggested altered cerebral cortical representation of pain in subjects with high hypnotizability scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellum; Hypnotizability; Laser evoked potentials; Pain; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26846218     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-016-0764-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  50 in total

1.  Assessment of trigeminal small-fiber function: brain and reflex responses evoked by CO2-laser stimulation.

Authors:  G Cruccu; A Romaniello; A Amantini; M Lombardi; P Innocenti; M Manfredi
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Modulation of pain-induced endothelial dysfunction by hypnotisability.

Authors:  Zoltan Jambrik; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Tibor Rudisch; Albert Varga; Tamas Forster; Giancarlo Carli
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Effects of vestibular and neck proprioceptive stimulation on posture as a function of hypnotizability.

Authors:  Enrica L Santarcangelo; Eliana Scattina; Paolo Orsini; Luca Bruschini; Brunello Ghelarducci; Diego Manzoni
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2008-04

4.  Consensus paper: the cerebellum's role in movement and cognition.

Authors:  Leonard F Koziol; Deborah Budding; Nancy Andreasen; Stefano D'Arrigo; Sara Bulgheroni; Hiroshi Imamizu; Masao Ito; Mario Manto; Cherie Marvel; Krystal Parker; Giovanni Pezzulo; Narender Ramnani; Daria Riva; Jeremy Schmahmann; Larry Vandervert; Tadashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Revisiting the association between hypnotisability and blink rate.

Authors:  Francesco Di Gruttola; Paolo Orsini; Maria C Carboncini; Bruno Rossi; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  EEG P300 event-related markers of hypnosis.

Authors:  S M Jensen; A Barabasz; M Barabasz; D Warner
Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn       Date:  2001-10

7.  Cerebellar direct current stimulation modulates pain perception in humans.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Enrica Santarcangelo; Beatrice Vannini; Antonio Torzini; Giancarlo Carli; Roberta Ferrucci; Alberto Priori; Massimiliano Valeriani; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Altered experimental pain perception after cerebellar infarction.

Authors:  Ruth Ruscheweyh; Maria Kühnel; Filipp Filippopulos; Bernhard Blum; Thomas Eggert; Andreas Straube
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Pain modulation in waking and hypnosis in women: event-related potentials and sources of cortical activity.

Authors:  Vilfredo De Pascalis; Vincenzo Varriale; Immacolata Cacace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Hypnotic predictors of agency: Responsiveness to specific suggestions in hypnosis is associated with involuntariness in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Afik Faerman; Katy H Stimpson; James H Bishop; Eric Neri; Angela Phillips; Merve Gülser; Heer Amin; Romina Nejad; Aryandokht Fotros; Nolan R Williams; David Spiegel
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2021-10-22

Review 3.  tDCS of the Cerebellum: Where Do We Stand in 2016? Technical Issues and Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian C A A Bodranghien; Peter Mariën; Mario U Manto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in neurological disease.

Authors:  Roberta Ferrucci; Tommaso Bocci; Francesca Cortese; Fabiana Ruggiero; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Cerebellum Ataxias       Date:  2016-09-02

5.  Cerebellar direct current stimulation modulates hand blink reflex: implications for defensive behavior in humans.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Roberta Ferrucci; Davide Barloscio; Laura Parenti; Francesca Cortese; Alberto Priori; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-05

6.  New directions in hypnosis research: strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Graham A Jamieson; Antoine Lutz; Giuliana Mazzoni; William J McGeown; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Athena Demertzi; Vilfredo De Pascalis; Éva I Bányai; Christian Rominger; Patrik Vuilleumier; Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville; Devin B Terhune
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-04-12

7.  Complex Role of Hypnotizability in the Cognitive Control of Pain.

Authors:  Enrica L Santarcangelo; Sybille Consoli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20

8.  Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter?

Authors:  Esther Ibáñez-Marcelo; Lisa Campioni; Diego Manzoni; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Giovanni Petri
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Hypnosis-induced modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery.

Authors:  Paola Cesari; Michele Modenese; Sara Benedetti; Mehran Emadi Andani; Mirta Fiorio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Aurore Thibaut; Beatriz Costa; Isadora Ferreira; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.