Literature DB >> 26840898

Replication stress: getting back on track.

Matteo Berti, Alessandro Vindigni.   

Abstract

The replication-stress response enables the DNA replication machinery to overcome DNA lesions or intrinsic replication-fork obstacles, and it is essential to ensure faithful transmission of genetic information to daughter cells. Multiple replication stress–response pathways have been identified in recent years, thus raising questions about the specific and possibly redundant functions of these pathways. Here, we review the emerging mechanisms of the replication-stress response in mammalian cells and consider how they may influence the dynamics of the core DNA replication complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26840898      PMCID: PMC5125612          DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol        ISSN: 1545-9985            Impact factor:   15.369


  100 in total

1.  Break-induced replication occurs by conservative DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Roberto A Donnianni; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA.

Authors:  Luis Ignacio Toledo; Matthias Altmeyer; Maj-Britt Rask; Claudia Lukas; Dorthe Helena Larsen; Lou Klitgaard Povlsen; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Niels Mailand; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  FANCM regulates DNA chain elongation and is stabilized by S-phase checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Sarah Luke-Glaser; Brian Luke; Simona Grossi; Angelos Constantinou
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork.

Authors:  Edward A Nam; David Cortez
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  SHPRH and HLTF act in a damage-specific manner to coordinate different forms of postreplication repair and prevent mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jia-Ren Lin; Michelle K Zeman; Jia-Yun Chen; Muh-Ching Yee; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Manuel Luís Orta; Natalia Issaeva; Niklas Schultz; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing.

Authors:  Chiara Lucca; Fabio Vanoli; Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino; Achille Pellicioli; Giordano Liberi; James Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Cooperation of RAD51 and RAD54 in regression of a model replication fork.

Authors:  Dmitry V Bugreev; Matthew J Rossi; Alexander V Mazin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Chromosome rearrangements via template switching between diverged repeated sequences.

Authors:  Ranjith P Anand; Olga Tsaponina; Patricia W Greenwell; Cheng-Sheng Lee; Wei Du; Thomas D Petes; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  115 in total

1.  Tel1/ATM prevents degradation of replication forks that reverse after topoisomerase poisoning.

Authors:  Luca Menin; Sebastian Ursich; Camilla Trovesi; Ralph Zellweger; Massimo Lopes; Maria Pia Longhese; Michela Clerici
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Rad9/53BP1 protects stalled replication forks from degradation in Mec1/ATR-defective cells.

Authors:  Matteo Villa; Diego Bonetti; Massimo Carraro; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Repair and translesion synthesis of O 6-alkylguanine DNA lesions in human cells.

Authors:  Hua Du; Pengcheng Wang; Lin Li; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Replication Fork Activation Is Enabled by a Single-Stranded DNA Gate in CMG Helicase.

Authors:  Michael R Wasserman; Grant D Schauer; Michael E O'Donnell; Shixin Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Replication fork regression and its regulation.

Authors:  Xiangzhou Meng; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Gata6 promotes hair follicle progenitor cell renewal by genome maintenance during proliferation.

Authors:  Alex B Wang; Ying V Zhang; Tudorita Tumbar
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Mechanisms of oncogene-induced genomic instability.

Authors:  Simona Graziano; Susana Gonzalo
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Transcriptome guided identification of novel functions of RECQ1 helicase.

Authors:  Xing Lu; Swetha Parvathaneni; Xiao Ling Li; Ashish Lal; Sudha Sharma
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Ca2+-Stimulated AMPK-Dependent Phosphorylation of Exo1 Protects Stressed Replication Forks from Aberrant Resection.

Authors:  Shan Li; Zeno Lavagnino; Delphine Lemacon; Lingzhen Kong; Alessandro Ustione; Xuewen Ng; Yuanya Zhang; Yingchun Wang; Bin Zheng; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Alessandro Vindigni; David W Piston; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Zika Virus Infection Induces DNA Damage Response in Human Neural Progenitors That Enhances Viral Replication.

Authors:  Christy Hammack; Sarah C Ogden; Joseph C Madden; Angelica Medina; Chongchong Xu; Ernest Phillips; Yuna Son; Allaura Cone; Serena Giovinazzi; Ruth A Didier; David M Gilbert; Hongjun Song; Guoli Ming; Zhexing Wen; Margo A Brinton; Akash Gunjan; Hengli Tang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.