R X Bai1, W P Wang2, P W Zhao3, C B Li4. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China. 2. Graduate College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China. 3. Microbiology and Immunology Laboratory, School of Basic Medical Science, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China. 4. School of Basic Medical Science, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common causes of death from gynecologic tumors and is an important public health issue. Ghrelin is a recently discovered bioactive peptide that acts as a natural endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR). Several studies have identified the protective effects of ghrelin on the mammalian reproductive system. However, little research has been done on the effects of ghrelin on ovarian cancer cells, and the underlying mechanisms of these effects. We sought to understand the potential involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in ghrelin-mediated inhibition of growth of the ovarian line HO-8910. We applied different concentrations of ghrelin and an inhibitor of the ghrelin receptor (D-Lys3-GHRP-6) to HO-8910 cells and observed the growth rate of cells and changes in phosphorylation of the MAPKs ERK1/2, JNK and p38. We discovered that ghrelin-induced apoptosis of HO-8910 cells was though phosphorylated ERK1/2, and that this phosphorylation (as well as p90rsk phosphorylation) was mediated by the GHSR. The ERK1/2 pathway is known to play an essential part in the ghrelin-mediated apoptosis of HO-8910 cells. Hence, our study suggests that ghrelin inhibits the growth of HO-8910 cells primarily through the GHSR/ERK pathway.
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common causes of death from gynecologic tumors and is an important public health issue. Ghrelin is a recently discovered bioactive peptide that acts as a natural endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR). Several studies have identified the protective effects of ghrelin on the mammalian reproductive system. However, little research has been done on the effects of ghrelin on ovarian cancer cells, and the underlying mechanisms of these effects. We sought to understand the potential involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in ghrelin-mediated inhibition of growth of the ovarian line HO-8910. We applied different concentrations of ghrelin and an inhibitor of the ghrelin receptor (D-Lys3-GHRP-6) to HO-8910 cells and observed the growth rate of cells and changes in phosphorylation of the MAPKs ERK1/2, JNK and p38. We discovered that ghrelin-induced apoptosis of HO-8910 cells was though phosphorylated ERK1/2, and that this phosphorylation (as well as p90rsk phosphorylation) was mediated by the GHSR. The ERK1/2 pathway is known to play an essential part in the ghrelin-mediated apoptosis of HO-8910 cells. Hence, our study suggests that ghrelin inhibits the growth of HO-8910 cells primarily through the GHSR/ERK pathway.
Every year more than 225,000 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer and an estimated
140,000 deaths are caused by ovarian cancer worldwide (1). Five-year survival for patients with ovarian cancer is 92% if the tumor
is detected at an early, localized stage. However, early diagnosis is rare; 85% of
ovarian cancers are detected at a more advanced stage because symptoms are easily missed
until the disease has spread to other body regions (2). Thus, the overall five-year survival for all women diagnosed with
epithelial ovarian carcinoma is only 44% (2,3). Because of the overall high mortality of ovarian
cancer, women at increased risk may be counseled to undergo prophylactic (and possibly
unnecessary) oophorectomy (4).Ghrelin is an endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR). It
is a 28-amino acid peptide produced from a pre-prohormone with a length of 117 amino
acids. The mature form of ghrelin can undergo several post-translational modifications,
including addition of a fatty-acid chain (n-octanoic acid) to the serine 3 residue
(5). Ghrelin has been shown to stimulate
secretion of growth hormone, and to have orexigenic and adipogenic effects (6). Most ghrelin is produced in the stomach by a
distinct group of endocrine cells located within the gastric oxyntic mucosa (7,8), with
smaller amounts produced by other organs. Small amounts of ghrelin have also been
observed elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas, and its activity
influences the metabolism of glucose and lipids.This peptide also has less well-understood roles in other tissues and organs. Ghrelin
expression has been reported at low levels in the brain, pituitary gland, kidneys, and
thyroid gland, as well as in several areas of the reproductive system, including the
placenta, testes, and ovaries (9). A recent
report describes ghrelin expression at mRNA and peptide levels in the ovaries of adult
rats. mRNA levels of ghrelin in ratovaries were monitored throughout the estrous cycle
to better understand physiologic regulation of expression of the ghrelin gene in ovaries
(10). Despite persistent expression of the
signal throughout all stages of the estrous cycle, mRNA levels of ghrelin change in a
cyclic fashion, with lowest expression occurring in the proestrus phase, and maximum
values in the diestrous phase (11).In many (though not all) normal tissues, ghrelin stimulates cell proliferation and
protects against apoptosis (7). In contrast,
there are numerous reports of ghrelin-mediated inhibition of the growth of cancer cells
(9), including the ovarian cancer cells known
as HO-8910 (2). There are conflicting reports
describing positive and negative effects of ghrelin and other growth hormone-stimulating
molecules on the growth of tumor cells in vitro (12,13). The activity of
several signaling pathways, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways,
have been implicated in these processes. We investigated if ghrelin exerts its
inhibitory effects on HO-8910 cells through GHSR activation and the downstream activity
of MAPKs.
Material and Methods
Unless specified otherwise, all chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(USA). Antibodies against IgG, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), ERK1/2,
JNK, p90rsk, phospho-ERK1/2, phospho-JNK and phospho-p90rsk1 (Ser380) were purchased
from Millipore (USA). Unless specified otherwise, culture of the ovarian line HO-8910
(Chinese Academy of Sciences, China) took place at 38.5°C with 5% CO2 under
humidified air. The HO-8910 cell line is derived from a 51-year-old Chinese patient with
ovarian cancer and ascites in 1994.
RNA extraction and reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from HO-8910 cells using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germany). RNA
samples were treated with RNase-free DNase I to remove contamination of genomic DNA.
RNA content of samples was too low to be quantified accurately by spectrometry. Thus,
6.5-µL RNA aliquots were converted to cDNA by reverse transcription, then amplified
(Takara Bio, Japan). PCR primers for the ghrelin receptor were: sense, 5′-TCTTCCTTCCTGTCTTCTGTC-3′; antisense,
5′-AGTCTGAACACTGCCACC-3′ (14).
Initially, cells were grown in 96-well plates (1×103 cells/well) with
ghrelin and D-Lys3-GHRP-6. Control cells were switched from RPMI1640 to Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). At 12, 24,
36, 48, 60 and 72 h after treatment with ghrelin and D-Lys3-GHRP-6, 20 µL of MTT was
added to each well to a final concentration of 0.5%. After 4 h incubation at 37°C in
the dark, 150 µL DMSO was added to each well for 10 min to dissolve formazan
crystals. Absorbance was measured using a microplate reader (ELx800; BioTek, USA) at
490 nm. Experiments were repeated three times. Viability of ghrelin- and
D-Lys3-GHRP-6-treated cells was expressed as the percentage of population growth plus
standard error of the mean relative to that of untreated control cells. Cell death
caused by ghrelin and D-Lys3-GHRP-6 was calculated as a percentage of inhibition
using the following formula: Percent inhibition = (1 - mean experimental
absorbance/mean control absorbance) ×100.
Assay to determine effective concentrations of ghrelin and D-Lys3-GHRP-6 (ghrelin
receptor inhibitor)
Ghrelin was added to HO-8910 growth media to final concentrations of 121, 152, 182,
212, and 242 nM, cells were cultured for 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h, and then the
growth of HO-8910 cells was analyzed. Once the optimum ghrelin concentration and
treatment duration to achieve inhibition were determined, this treatment was repeated
with addition of D-Lys3-GHRP-6 to final concentrations of 10-8,
10-9, 10-10, and 10-11 mg/mL. HO-8910 cells were
then cultured for 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h, and their growth analyzed.
Western blotting
HO-8910 cells were homogenized and proteins separated by electrophoresis on 8-12%
sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gels, and then transferred to immunoblot
nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked for 30 min at room temperature with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% fat-free milk and 0.1% Tween 20. Then,
membranes were incubated with primary anti-Rac1 antibody for ≥1 h at room
temperature, or overnight at 4°C. Then, membranes were washed thrice with PBS
containing 0.1% Tween 20, incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies,
and developed using ECL reagent (Pierce, USA).
siRNA design
RNA interference was used to silence expression of ERK1/2 in HO-8910 cells.
ERK1/2-siRNA (TGAATTGTATCATCAACAT)
was synthesized by Gene Pharma Biotechnology (China).
Transfection of siRNA
siRNA transfection was conducted using lipofectamine according to the protocol
supplied by Invitrogen (USA). Briefly, 1×105 cells were seeded onto
six-well plates containing antibiotic-free medium and incubated overnight. For each
well, 5 µL siRNA was mixed with 125 µL Opti-MEM I. The mixture was combined with a
solution of 5 µL lipofectamine in 125 µL Opti-MEM I. After 20 min at room
temperature, the mixture was applied to cells in an appropriate volume of Opti-MEM I
to achieve a final concentration of 100 nM for each siRNA. Negative control group was
transfected without siRNA. After incubation for 6 h at 37°C, RPMI1640 supplemented
with serum was added to wells. Cells were cultured for an additional 24 h at 37°C
before analyses.
Results
GHS-R expression in HO-8910 cells
RT-PCR was used to detect expression of GHSR mRNA in HO-8910 cells.
The GHSR (348 bp) was expressed at a high level in HO-8910 cells
(Figure 1).
Figure 1
Expression of GHSR mRNA in HO-8910 cells by RT-PCR. 1: sample; 2: water
blank; M: DNA Marker DL 2000.
Optimal concentrations and timing of treatment of ghrelin and D-Lys3-GHRP-6 on
HO-8910 cells
The MTT assay was used to assess the growth and viability of HO-8910 cells after
treatment with varying concentrations of ghrelin, and to determine the appropriate
duration of treatment to achieve the desired level of growth inhibition.Ghrelin was added to HO-8910 media to final concentrations of 121, 152, 182, 212 and
242 nM. Numbers of viable cells were assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h (Figure 2A). The optimal concentration and duration
of ghrelin treatment for HO-8910 cells was found to be 182 nM and 24 h,
respectively.
Figure 2
Growth of HO-8910 cells after treatment with ghrelin and with ghrelin plus
D-Lys3-GHRP-6. A, Inhibition of growth 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and
72 h after treatment with increasing concentrations of ghrelin. Data are
reported as means±SD (n=5). B, Effect of D-Lys3-GHRP-6
treatment on cell growth after ghrelin treatment. One-way ANOVA was used for
statistical analysis.
Next, we determined the D-Lys3-GHRP-6 concentration needed to prevent the growth
inhibition caused by 182 nM ghrelin in HO-8910 cells. HO-8910 cells that had been
treated with 182 nM ghrelin were treated with D-Lys3-GHRP-6 (10-5,
10-6, 10-7, 10-8 ng/mL) and cell numbers
evaluated at 24 h (Figure 2B). We found that
10-6 ng/mL D-Lys3-GHRP-6 could inhibit the growth inhibition caused by
182 nM ghrelin.
Ghrelin inhibited the growth of HO-8910 cells via the ERK1/2
pathway
To ascertain which pathway has a key role in ghrelin-mediated inhibition of the
growth of HO-8910 cells, the phosphorylation status of the MAPKs ERK1/2, JNK and p38
was detected at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 60 min (Figure
3) after treatment with 182 nM ghrelin. A decrease in ERK1/2
phosphorylation was greater than that observed for JNK or p38 after 20 min.
Figure 3
Effects of 182 nM ghrelin on mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)
activation in HO-8910 cells. A, Expression of total and
phosphorylated ERK1/2, JNKs, and p38 proteins. B, Contrast
gray value of the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNKs and p38 based on Western
blotting.
When this treatment was repeated with addition of 10-9 mg/mL
D-Lys3-GHRP-6, ERK1/2 phosphorylation was reduced compared with treatment with
ghrelin alone. The phosphorylation status of JNK and p38 were not changed
significantly (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Effects of an inhibitor of the ghrelin receptor (D-Lys3-GHRP-6) on
ghrelin-mediated MAPK activation in HO-8910 cells. A,
Expression of total and phosphorylated ERK1/2, JNKs, and p38 proteins at 0, 10,
20, 30 and 60 min. B, Contrast gray value of the
phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNKs and p38 based on Western blotting.
This result suggested that ERK1/2 has a key role in the ability of ghrelin to block
the growth of HO-8910 cells. To verify this finding, siRNA specific for ERK1/2 was
used to knock down ERK1/2 expression (Figure
5). Also, the phosphorylation of p90rsk (p-p90rsk) was
low (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Effects siRNA knockdown of ERK1/2 on ERK1/2, p90rsk and
phosphorylation of p90rsk. A, Expression of ERK1/2
after ERK1/2 knockdown. B, Expression of p90rsk and
phospho-p90rsk at different times after knockdown (0, 10, 20, 30,
60 min).
After reduction of ERK1/2 by siRNA knockdown, ghrelin (182 nM) was
no longer able to reduce the growth of HO-8910 cells (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Prevention of ghrelin-mediated growth inhibition in HO-8910 cells after
knockdown by siRNA of ERK1/2. *P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA).
Discussion
Ghrelin is produced predominantly by the stomach, though smaller amounts are produced by
the bowel, pancreas, pituitary, kidneys, and placenta. The GHSR is a typical G
protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor (15). Several studies have identified the protective effects of ghrelin (4,16
17
18), but little is known about the effects of
ghrelin on ovarian cancer cells or their mechanism of action. We found that the
mechanism through which ghrelin inhibits the growth of HO-8910 cells involves the ERK1/2
branch of MAPK pathways. Maximum inhibition of the growth of HO-8910 cells was achieved
using 182 nM ghrelin for 24 h. We also demonstrated that this effect of ghrelin was
mediated through its receptor, the GHSR (19),
which were shown to be expressed at high levels in HO-8910 cells. Experiments in which
the GHSR inhibitor D-Lys3-GHRP-6 (10-6 ng/mL) blocked ghrelin-mediated growth
inhibition provided further support for the role of the GHSR.To gain further insight into the mechanism by which ghrelin inhibits growth of HO-8910
cells, we evaluated the activity of signaling pathways downstream of the GHSR. MAPKs are
a family of serine/threonine kinases that includes ERK, JNK and p38. These kinases are
involved primarily in activation of the nuclear transcription factors that control the
proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis of cells (20). Our study suggests that ghrelin inhibits the growth of HO-8910 cells
via the ERK signaling pathway, and not through activation of JNK or
p38. We found that 20–60 min of ghrelin treatment was required to inhibit ERK
phosphorylation, so stimulation was time-dependent. Furthermore, GHSR blockade by
chemical inhibition and silencing of ERK by siRNA suppressed ghrelin-mediated inhibition
of the growth of HO-8910 cells.Overall, our study suggests that the ghrelin/GHSR signaling pathway attenuates the
growth of HO-8910 cells mainly through an ERK-dependent pathway. Thus, ghrelin could be
a target for ovarian cancer therapy. Despite this promising finding, further study is
necessary before clinical application is considered.
Authors: R Northrup; K Kuroda; E Manning Duus; S Routt Barnes; L Cheatham; T Wiley; C Pietra Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michelle L Maugham; Inge Seim; Patrick B Thomas; Gabrielle J Crisp; Esha T Shah; Adrian C Herington; Laura S Gregory; Colleen C Nelson; Penny L Jeffery; Lisa K Chopin Journal: Endocrine Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Attalla Farag El-Kott; Ali A Shati; Mohammed Ali Al-Kahtani; Sultan Alqahtani Journal: Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 2.916
Authors: Aura D Herrera-Martínez; Manuel D Gahete; Rafael Sánchez-Sánchez; Emilia Alors-Perez; Sergio Pedraza-Arevalo; Raquel Serrano-Blanch; Antonio J Martínez-Fuentes; Maria A Gálvez-Moreno; Justo P Castaño; Raúl M Luque Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Jin Sun Lee; Myung Sun Lee; Eun Young Cha; Phuong Thien Thuong; Ji Young Sul; Jun Beom Park; Young Bok Ko Journal: Mol Med Rep Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 2.952