PURPOSE: Anamorelin (ONO-7643) is an orally active ghrelin receptor agonist in development for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-related anorexia/cachexia. It displays both orexigenic and anabolic properties via ghrelin mimetic activity and transient increases in growth hormone (GH). However, increasing GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 in cancer patients raises concerns of potentially stimulating tumor growth. Therefore, we investigated the effect of ghrelin and anamorelin on tumor growth in a murine NSCLC xenograft model. METHODS: Female nude mice (15-21/group) with established A549 tumors were administered ghrelin (2 mg/kg i.p.), anamorelin (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg p.o.), or vehicle controls daily for 28 days. Tumor growth, food consumption, and body weight were monitored. Murine growth hormone (mGH) and murine insulin-like growth factor-1 (mIGF-1) were measured in plasma. RESULTS: Tumor growth progressed throughout the study, with no significant differences between treatment groups. Daily food consumption was also relatively unchanged, while the percentage of mean body weight gain at the end of treatment was significantly increased in animals administered 10 and 30 mg/kg compared with controls (p < 0.01). Peak mGH levels were significantly higher in ghrelin- and anamorelin-treated animals than in controls, while peak mIGF-1 levels were slightly elevated but not statistically significant. All regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that neither anamorelin nor ghrelin promoted tumor growth in this model, despite increased levels of mGH and a trend of increased mIGF-1. Together with anamorelin's ability to increase body weight, these results support the clinical development of ghrelin receptor agonist treatments for managing NSCLC-related anorexia/cachexia.
PURPOSE:Anamorelin (ONO-7643) is an orally active ghrelin receptor agonist in development for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-related anorexia/cachexia. It displays both orexigenic and anabolic properties via ghrelin mimetic activity and transient increases in growth hormone (GH). However, increasing GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 in cancerpatients raises concerns of potentially stimulating tumor growth. Therefore, we investigated the effect of ghrelin and anamorelin on tumor growth in a murineNSCLC xenograft model. METHODS: Female nude mice (15-21/group) with established A549 tumors were administered ghrelin (2 mg/kg i.p.), anamorelin (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg p.o.), or vehicle controls daily for 28 days. Tumor growth, food consumption, and body weight were monitored. Murinegrowth hormone (mGH) and murineinsulin-like growth factor-1 (mIGF-1) were measured in plasma. RESULTS:Tumor growth progressed throughout the study, with no significant differences between treatment groups. Daily food consumption was also relatively unchanged, while the percentage of mean body weight gain at the end of treatment was significantly increased in animals administered 10 and 30 mg/kg compared with controls (p < 0.01). Peak mGH levels were significantly higher in ghrelin- and anamorelin-treated animals than in controls, while peak mIGF-1 levels were slightly elevated but not statistically significant. All regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that neither anamorelin nor ghrelin promoted tumor growth in this model, despite increased levels of mGH and a trend of increased mIGF-1. Together with anamorelin's ability to increase body weight, these results support the clinical development of ghrelin receptor agonist treatments for managing NSCLC-related anorexia/cachexia.
Authors: G J Hickey; T M Jacks; K D Schleim; E Frazier; H Y Chen; D Krupa; W Feeney; R P Nargund; A A Patchett; R G Smith Journal: J Endocrinol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Shahrokh F Shariat; Dolores J Lamb; Michael W Kattan; Cuong Nguyen; JaHong Kim; Josie Beck; Thomas M Wheeler; Kevin M Slawin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Oscar Arrieta; Rosa M Michel Ortega; Geraldine Villanueva-Rodríguez; Maria G Serna-Thomé; Diana Flores-Estrada; Consuelo Diaz-Romero; Cindy M Rodríguez; Luis Martínez; Karla Sánchez-Lara Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: W D Dewys; C Begg; P T Lavin; P R Band; J M Bennett; J R Bertino; M H Cohen; H O Douglass; P F Engstrom; E Z Ezdinli; J Horton; G J Johnson; C G Moertel; M M Oken; C Perlia; C Rosenbaum; M N Silverstein; R T Skeel; R W Sponzo; D C Tormey Journal: Am J Med Date: 1980-10 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: F Strasser; T A Lutz; M T Maeder; B Thuerlimann; D Bueche; M Tschöp; K Kaufmann; B Holst; M Brändle; R von Moos; R Demmer; T Cerny Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-01-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Elena Pastor-Cavada; Leticia M Pardo; Dalia Kandil; Cristina Torres-Fuentes; Sarah L Clarke; Hamdy Shaban; Gerard P McGlacken; Harriet Schellekens Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Nelson Inácio Pinto; June Carnier; Lila M Oyama; Jose Pinhata Otoch; Paulo Sergio Alcântara; Flavio Tokeshi; Claudia M Nascimento Journal: Mediators Inflamm Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 4.711