Mary C Stephenson1, Lingaraj Krishna2, Rina Malathi Pannir Selvan3,4, Yee Kit Tai3,4, Craig Jun Kit Wong3,4, Jocelyn Naixin Yin3,4, Shi-Jie Toh3,4, Federico Torta5,6, Alexander Triebl5, Jürg Fröhlich7, Christian Beyer8, Jing Ze Li3, Sara S Tan2, Chun-Kit Wong1, Duraimurugan Chinnasamy9, Leroy Sivappiragasam Pakkiri10,11, Chester Lee Drum3,10,11, Markus R Wenk5,6, John J Totman1,12, Alfredo Franco-Obregón3,4,13,14,15,16. 1. Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 2. Division of Sports Medicine and Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore. 3. Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 4. BioIonic Currents Electromagnetic Pulsing Systems Laboratory, BICEPS, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 5. Singapore Lipidomics Incubator, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 6. Precision Medicine Translational Research Program, Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 7. Fields at Work GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland. 8. Centre Suisse d'électronique et de Microtechnique, CSEM SA, Neuchatel, Switzerland. 9. National University Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation Centre, National University Health System, Singapore. 10. Cardiovascular Research Institute (CVRI), National University Heart Centre Singapore (NUHCS), Singapore. 11. Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 12. Academic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 13. Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 14. Institute for Health Innovation & Technology, iHealthtech, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 15. NUS Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore. 16. Competence Center for Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic disruption commonly follows Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. Brief exposure to low amplitude and frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) has been shown to promote in vitro and in vivo murine myogeneses via the activation of a calcium-mitochondrial axis conferring systemic metabolic adaptations. This randomized-controlled pilot trial sought to detect local changes in muscle structure and function using MRI, and systemic changes in metabolism using plasma biomarker analyses resulting from ACLR, with or without accompanying PEMF therapy. Methods: 20 patients requiring ACLR were randomized into two groups either undergoing PEMF or sham exposure for 16 weeks following surgery. The operated thighs of 10 patients were exposed weekly to PEMFs (1 mT for 10 min) for 4 months following surgery. Another 10 patients were subjected to sham exposure and served as controls to allow assessment of the metabolic repercussions of ACLR and PEMF therapy. Blood samples were collected prior to surgery and at 16 weeks for plasma analyses. Magnetic resonance data were acquired at 1 and 16 weeks post-surgery using a Siemens 3T Tim Trio system. Phosphorus (31P) Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) was utilized to monitor changes in high-energy phosphate metabolism (inorganic phosphate (Pi), adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and phosphocreatine (PCr)) as well as markers of membrane synthesis and breakdown (phosphomonoesters (PME) and phosphodiester (PDE)). Quantitative Magnetization Transfer (qMT) imaging was used to elucidate changes in the underlying tissue structure, with T1-weighted and 2-point Dixon imaging used to calculate muscle volumes and muscle fat content. Results: Improvements in markers of high-energy phosphate metabolism including reductions in ΔPi/ATP, Pi/PCr and (Pi + PCr)/ATP, and membrane kinetics, including reductions in PDE/ATP were detected in the PEMF-treated cohort relative to the control cohort at study termination. These were associated with reductions in the plasma levels of certain ceramides and lysophosphatidylcholine species. The plasma levels of biomarkers predictive of muscle regeneration and degeneration, including osteopontin and TNNT1, respectively, were improved, whilst changes in follistatin failed to achieve statistical significance. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry revealed reductions in small molecule biomarkers of metabolic disruption, including cysteine, homocysteine, and methionine in the PEMF-treated cohort relative to the control cohort at study termination. Differences in measurements of force, muscle and fat volumes did not achieve statistical significance between the cohorts after 16 weeks post-ACLR. Conclusion: The detected changes suggest improvements in systemic metabolism in the post-surgical PEMF-treated cohort that accords with previous preclinical murine studies. PEMF-based therapies may potentially serve as a manner to ameliorate post-surgery metabolic disruptions and warrant future examination in more adequately powered clinical trials. The Translational Potential of this Article: Some degree of physical immobilisation must inevitably follow orthopaedic surgical intervention. The clinical paradox of such a scenario is that the regenerative potential of the muscle mitochondrial pool is silenced. The unmet need was hence a manner to maintain mitochondrial activation when movement is restricted and without producing potentially damaging mechanical stress. PEMF-based therapies may satisfy the requirement of non-invasively activating the requisite mitochondrial respiration when mobility is restricted for improved metabolic and regenerative recovery.
Background: Metabolic disruption commonly follows Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. Brief exposure to low amplitude and frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) has been shown to promote in vitro and in vivo murine myogeneses via the activation of a calcium-mitochondrial axis conferring systemic metabolic adaptations. This randomized-controlled pilot trial sought to detect local changes in muscle structure and function using MRI, and systemic changes in metabolism using plasma biomarker analyses resulting from ACLR, with or without accompanying PEMF therapy. Methods: 20 patients requiring ACLR were randomized into two groups either undergoing PEMF or sham exposure for 16 weeks following surgery. The operated thighs of 10 patients were exposed weekly to PEMFs (1 mT for 10 min) for 4 months following surgery. Another 10 patients were subjected to sham exposure and served as controls to allow assessment of the metabolic repercussions of ACLR and PEMF therapy. Blood samples were collected prior to surgery and at 16 weeks for plasma analyses. Magnetic resonance data were acquired at 1 and 16 weeks post-surgery using a Siemens 3T Tim Trio system. Phosphorus (31P) Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) was utilized to monitor changes in high-energy phosphate metabolism (inorganic phosphate (Pi), adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and phosphocreatine (PCr)) as well as markers of membrane synthesis and breakdown (phosphomonoesters (PME) and phosphodiester (PDE)). Quantitative Magnetization Transfer (qMT) imaging was used to elucidate changes in the underlying tissue structure, with T1-weighted and 2-point Dixon imaging used to calculate muscle volumes and muscle fat content. Results: Improvements in markers of high-energy phosphate metabolism including reductions in ΔPi/ATP, Pi/PCr and (Pi + PCr)/ATP, and membrane kinetics, including reductions in PDE/ATP were detected in the PEMF-treated cohort relative to the control cohort at study termination. These were associated with reductions in the plasma levels of certain ceramides and lysophosphatidylcholine species. The plasma levels of biomarkers predictive of muscle regeneration and degeneration, including osteopontin and TNNT1, respectively, were improved, whilst changes in follistatin failed to achieve statistical significance. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry revealed reductions in small molecule biomarkers of metabolic disruption, including cysteine, homocysteine, and methionine in the PEMF-treated cohort relative to the control cohort at study termination. Differences in measurements of force, muscle and fat volumes did not achieve statistical significance between the cohorts after 16 weeks post-ACLR. Conclusion: The detected changes suggest improvements in systemic metabolism in the post-surgical PEMF-treated cohort that accords with previous preclinical murine studies. PEMF-based therapies may potentially serve as a manner to ameliorate post-surgery metabolic disruptions and warrant future examination in more adequately powered clinical trials. The Translational Potential of this Article: Some degree of physical immobilisation must inevitably follow orthopaedic surgical intervention. The clinical paradox of such a scenario is that the regenerative potential of the muscle mitochondrial pool is silenced. The unmet need was hence a manner to maintain mitochondrial activation when movement is restricted and without producing potentially damaging mechanical stress. PEMF-based therapies may satisfy the requirement of non-invasively activating the requisite mitochondrial respiration when mobility is restricted for improved metabolic and regenerative recovery.
Authors: Paul T Reidy; Alec I McKenzie; Ziad Mahmassani; Vincent R Morrow; Nikol M Yonemura; Paul N Hopkins; Robin L Marcus; Matthew T Rondina; Yu Kuei Lin; Micah J Drummond Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Omar Valdes; Carlos Ramirez; Felipe Perez; Sebastian Garcia-Vicencio; Kazunori Nosaka; Luis Penailillo Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Christopher L Mendias; Evan B Lynch; Max E Davis; Elizabeth R Sibilsky Enselman; Julie A Harning; Paul D Dewolf; Tarek A Makki; Asheesh Bedi Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Kyoung-Jin Oh; Da Som Lee; Won Kon Kim; Baek Soo Han; Sang Chul Lee; Kwang-Hee Bae Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Ladislav Valkovič; Marek Chmelík; Barbara Ukropcová; Thomas Heckmann; Wolfgang Bogner; Ivan Frollo; Harald Tschan; Michael Krebs; Norbert Bachl; Jozef Ukropec; Siegfried Trattnig; Martin Krššák Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: M T Hooijmans; N Doorenweerd; C Baligand; J J G M Verschuuren; I Ronen; E H Niks; A G Webb; H E Kan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240