| Literature DB >> 26836265 |
Cosetta Minelli1, Charlotte H Dean2,3, Matthew Hind4, Alexessander Couto Alves5, André F S Amaral1,6, Valerie Siroux7,8,9, Ville Huikari10, María Soler Artigas11, David M Evans12,13, Daan W Loth14, Yohan Bossé15, Dirkje S Postma16, Don Sin17, John Thompson18, Florence Demenais19,20, John Henderson21, Emmanuelle Bouzigon19,20, Deborah Jarvis1,6, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin5,6,10,22,23, Peter Burney1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is an important predictor of all-cause mortality in the absence of chronic respiratory conditions. Epidemiological evidence highlights the role of early life factors on adult FVC, pointing to environmental exposures and genes affecting lung development as risk factors for low FVC later in life. Although highly heritable, a small number of genes have been found associated with FVC, and we aimed at identifying further genetic variants by focusing on lung development genes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26836265 PMCID: PMC4737618 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of studies in Stage 1.
N = number of subjects included in the analyses.
| Study | N | Country | Sex[% male] | Age (years) | Height (cm)[Mean (SD)] | FVC (ml)[Mean (SD)] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute Range | Mean (SD) | ||||||
| NFBC1966 | 5,218 | Finland | 47.9% | 31–31 | 31 (0) | 171.2 (9.2) | 4,718 (987) |
| ECRHS | 1,662 | Spain, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, Estonia | 47.5% | 19.7–48.1 | 34.0 (7.1) | 170.5 (9.5) | 4,552 (1,031) |
| EGEA | 869 | France | 46.1% | 18.0–76.5 | 38.5 (12.6) | 168.6 (8.5) | 4,239 (982) |
Results for the best SNP of the top 25 genes in Stage 1: NFBC 1966, ECRHS, EGEA, and meta-analysis.
Chr: chromosome; EA: effect allele; EAF: effect allele frequency, calculated as weighted average across the three studies; β (standard error, SE): estimate of the per-allele effect on FVC (ml); I2: magnitude of the between-study heterogeneity of effect estimates
| SNP | Gene | Chr | Position | EA | EAF | NFBC1966(N = 5,218) | ECRHS(N = 1,662) | EGEA(N = 869) | Meta-analysis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | β | SE | β | SE | β | SE | I2 (%) | ||||||||||
| rs2820472 | 1 | 68,694,307 | C | 0.70 | 31.0 | 11.3 | 30.3 | 21.7 | -17.5 | 32.0 | 26.5 | 9.6 | 4 | |||||
| rs832169 | 1 | 201,256,771 | A | 0.17 | 29.2 | 15.8 | 50.0 | 22.4 | 41.1 | 31.9 | 36.9 | 12.0 | 0 | |||||
| rs7527525 | 1 | 236,902,560 | C | 0.33 | 20.0 | 11.7 | 33.6 | 20.2 | 63.7 | 28.0 | 28.1 | 9.5 | 8 | |||||
| rs3905417 | 2 | 80,181,443 | A | 0.23 | 29.9 | 12.2 | 30.4 | 24.4 | 45.7 | 34.0 | 31.4 | 10.4 | 0 | |||||
| rs6754561 | 2 | 224,839,696 | C | 0.30 | -29.6 | 12.2 | -23.0 | 19.3 | -11.4 | 26.8 | -25.6 | 9.6 | 0 | |||||
| rs11926758 | 3 | 25,552,252 | G | 0.94 | 52.5 | 22.9 | 51.3 | 37.7 | 48.8 | 48.1 | 51.7 | 18.1 | 0 | |||||
| rs11716871 | 3 | 189,582,501 | A | 0.92 | -55.4 | 19.1 | -32.5 | 34.0 | -36.1 | 47.2 | -48.4 | 15.7 | 0 | |||||
| rs4712047 | 6 | 13,590,185 | A | 0.66 | 34.0 | 11.2 | 9.9 | 22.7 | 27.9 | 32.3 | 29.2 | 9.6 | 0 | |||||
| rs2722322 | 7 | 37,948,714 | A | 0.15 | 51.7 | 15.4 | 36.8 | 24.3 | 16.3 | 35.3 | 43.7 | 12.2 | 0 | |||||
| rs17172023 | 7 | 42,245,499 | C | 0.78 | 36.4 | 13.8 | 25.2 | 24.4 | 10.2 | 33.8 | 31.1 | 11.3 | 0 | |||||
| rs1049337 | 7 | 116,200,587 | C | 0.70 | 33.6 | 11.6 | 28.1 | 19.8 | -10.3 | 29.3 | 27.8 | 9.5 | 0 | |||||
| rs2707469 | 7 | 120,976,886 | A | 0.83 | 34.2 | 14.3 | 23.6 | 25.9 | 34.5 | 39.1 | 32.0 | 11.9 | 0 | |||||
| rs12549242 | 8 | 72,216,430 | C | 0.14 | -38.6 | 16.1 | -53.8 | 24.3 | -72.2 | 43.4 | -45.8 | 12.8 | 0 | |||||
| rs2812427 | 10 | 79,553,236 | A | 0.67 | 33.3 | 11.2 | 14.8 | 19.8 | 63.1 | 28.5 | 32.4 | 9.2 | 0 | |||||
| rs1994450 | 11 | 103,797,349 | A | 0.13 | -41.9 | 18.0 | -64.3 | 29.3 | 2.1 | 38.9 | -41.3 | 14.3 | 0 | |||||
| rs12708369 | 12 | 124,875,577 | C | 0.56 | 25.1 | 11.5 | 46.0 | 20.7 | -9.1 | 30.1 | 26.1 | 9.5 | 13 | |||||
| rs11865499 | 16 | 31,132,250 | A | 0.69 | 33.7 | 11.3 | 20.4 | 19.9 | 6.2 | 28.9 | 27.9 | 9.3 | 0 | |||||
| rs1880756 | 17 | 43,826,666 | C | 0.58 | -26.5 | 10.6 | -28.6 | 19.4 | -5.4 | 27.8 | -24.8 | 8.8 | 0 | |||||
| rs948589 | 18 | 48,586,184 | A | 0.91 | -47.2 | 19.0 | -56.4 | 34.4 | -78.5 | 50.7 | -52.2 | 15.8 | 0 | |||||
| rs2425024 | 20 | 33,844,938 | A | 0.66 | 25.0 | 11.3 | 23.9 | 19.4 | 55.7 | 26.9 | 28.4 | 9.2 | 0 | |||||
| rs6061580 | 20 | 60,058,986 | C | 0.92 | -60.4 | 22.3 | -41.5 | 37.3 | -7.6 | 47.0 | -48.7 | 17.7 | 0 | |||||
| rs2051179 | 21 | 36,326,553 | A | 0.45 | -32.0 | 10.9 | -15.7 | 18.8 | -16.1 | 25.9 | -26.6 | 8.8 | 0 | |||||
| rs730265 | 21 | 37,871,886 | A | 0.15 | -25.8 | 15.6 | -41.8 | 24.2 | -55.2 | 33.7 | -33.7 | 12.2 | 0 | |||||
| rs2871029 | 22 | 19,513,930 | A | 0.14 | 31.4 | 15.1 | 66.5 | 27.6 | -10.3 | 40.0 | 34.6 | 12.6 | 24 | |||||
| rs5749524 | 22 | 33,224,285 | C | 0.89 | 49.7 | 17.0 | 22.4 | 29.3 | 58.5 | 38.1 | 44.9 | 13.7 | 0 | |||||
Replication findings for the best SNP of the top 25 genes.
Chr: chromosome; EA: effect allele; EAF: effect allele frequency; β (standard error, SE): per-allele effect on FVC (ml); Repl P: one-side replication p-value, calculated and reported only for estimates in the same direction as the original ones; I2: between-study heterogeneity; Imp R2 = imputation quality R2 (for CHARGE and SpiroMeta: average imputation R2 across studies)
| SNP | Gene | Chr | EA | EAF | STAGE 1meta-analysis(N = 7,749) | STAGE 2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHARGE and SpiroMeta meta-analysis(N = 46,103—Adults) | ALSPAC(N = 5,062—Children) | |||||||||||||||
| β | SE | β | SE | I2 (%) | Imp R2 | β | SE | Imp R2 | ||||||||
| rs2820472 | 1 | C | 0.70 | 26.5 | 9.6 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 35 | 0.92 | 1.6 | 8.3 | 0.97 | ||||
| rs832169 | 1 | A | 0.17 | 36.9 | 12.0 | -7.0 | 4.9 | 23 | 0.85 | -2.1 | 8.3 | / | 0.94 | |||
| rs7527525 | 1 | C | 0.33 | 28.1 | 9.5 | -4.2 | 4.6 | / | 24 | 0.71 | 11.2 | 7.2 | 0.90 | |||
| rs3905417 | 2 | A | 0.23 | 31.4 | 10.4 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 0 | 0.95 | 13.2 | 9.0 | 0.99 | ||||
| rs6754561 | 2 | C | 0.30 | -25.6 | 9.6 | -7.1 | 3.9 | 0 | 0.96 | -12.0 | 7.1 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs11926758 | 3 | G | 0.94 | 51.7 | 18.1 | -4.1 | 7.4 | 26 | 0.98 | 3.1 | 12.2 | 0.99 | ||||
| rs11716871 | 3 | A | 0.92 | -48.4 | 15.7 | 17.8 | 7.5 | 0 | 0.86 | -14.4 | 12.5 | 0.98 | ||||
| rs4712047 | 6 | A | 0.66 | 29.2 | 9.6 | 0.6 | 4.7 | 18 | 0.72 | -4.7 | 8.5 | 0.70 | ||||
| rs2722322 | 7 | A | 0.15 | 43.7 | 12.2 | -1.7 | 5.1 | 18 | 0.94 | 12.0 | 8.8 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs17172023 | 7 | C | 0.78 | 31.1 | 11.3 | -9.6 | 5.3 | 27 | 0.84 | 8.4 | 10.0 | 0.75 | ||||
| rs1049337 | 7 | C | 0.70 | 27.8 | 9.5 | -4.5 | 5.1 | 35 | 0.69 | 0.3 | 7.4 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs2707469 | 7 | A | 0.83 | 32.0 | 11.9 | 10.0 | 5.2 | 6 | 0.92 | 11.8 | 9.4 | 0.90 | ||||
| rs2812427 | 10 | A | 0.67 | 32.4 | 9.2 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 0 | 0.95 | 2.1 | 7.1 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs1994450 | 11 | A | 0.13 | -41.3 | 14.3 | -1.7 | 5.5 | 0 | 0.76 | -10.7 | 9.6 | 0.79 | ||||
| rs12708369 | 12 | C | 0.56 | 26.1 | 9.5 | NA | NA | NA | 38 | 0.38 | 26.9 | 7.6 | 0.78 | |||
| rs11865499 | 16 | A | 0.69 | 27.9 | 9.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 30 | 0.84 | 10.6 | 7.5 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs1880756 | 17 | C | 0.58 | -24.8 | 8.8 | -5.0 | 4.0 | 15 | 0.96 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs948589 | 18 | A | 0.91 | -52.2 | 15.8 | 8.8 | 6.7 | 0 | 0.96 | -14.7 | 12.2 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs2425024 | 20 | A | 0.66 | 28.4 | 9.2 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 0 | 0.96 | -11.3 | 7.1 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs6061580 | 20 | C | 0.92 | -48.7 | 17.7 | 9.0 | 8.6 | 3 | 0.73 | 2.6 | 13.9 | 0.92 | ||||
| rs2051179 | 21 | A | 0.45 | -26.6 | 8.8 | -3.8 | 3.8 | 26 | 0.94 | -5.9 | 6.7 | 0.97 | ||||
| rs730265 | 21 | A | 0.15 | -33.7 | 12.2 | -3.0 | 7.2 | 20 | 0.50 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 0.99 | ||||
| rs2871029 | 22 | A | 0.14 | 34.6 | 12.6 | -0.7 | 5.8 | 47 | 0.90 | 6.0 | 9.7 | 1.00 | ||||
| rs5749524 | 22 | C | 0.89 | 44.9 | 13.7 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0 | 0.94 | 1.4 | 10.4 | 1.00 | ||||
* Nominal significance (p<0.05)
** Significance after Bonferroni correction (p<0.002)
1 Results not available: the SNP had a very low average imputation R2 (0.38) and no proxies (LD R2>0.80) were available