Literature DB >> 26834908

SEMIPARAMETRIC TIME TO EVENT MODELS IN THE PRESENCE OF ERROR-PRONE, SELF-REPORTED OUTCOMES-WITH APPLICATION TO THE WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVE.

Xiangdong Gu1, Yunsheng Ma2, Raji Balasubramanian1.   

Abstract

The onset of several silent, chronic diseases such as diabetes can be detected only through diagnostic tests. Due to cost considerations, self-reported outcomes are routinely collected in lieu of expensive diagnostic tests in large-scale prospective investigations such as the Women's Health Initiative. However, self-reported outcomes are subject to imperfect sensitivity and specificity. Using a semiparametric likelihood-based approach, we present time to event models to estimate the association of one or more covariates with a error-prone, self-reported outcome. We present simulation studies to assess the effect of error in self-reported outcomes with regard to bias in the estimation of the regression parameter of interest. We apply the proposed methods to prospective data from 152,830 women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative to evaluate the effect of statin use with the risk of incident diabetes mellitus among postmenopausal women. The current analysis is based on follow-up through 2010, with a median duration of follow-up of 12.1 years. The methods proposed in this paper are readily implemented using our freely available R software package icensmis, which is available at the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) website.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Measurement error; interval censoring; panel data; time to event outcomes

Year:  2015        PMID: 26834908      PMCID: PMC4729390          DOI: 10.1214/15-AOAS810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  17 in total

1.  Adjusting survival analysis for the presence of unadjudicated study events.

Authors:  T D Cook
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-06

2.  Modeling markers of disease progression by a hidden Markov process: application to characterizing CD4 cell decline.

Authors:  C Guihenneuc-Jouyaux; S Richardson; I M Longini
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Discrete proportional hazards models for mismeasured outcomes.

Authors:  Amalia S Meier; Barbra A Richardson; James P Hughes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Hazard ratio estimation for biomarker-calibrated dietary exposures.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Survival analysis with uncertain endpoints.

Authors:  S M Snapinn
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Validation data-based adjustments for outcome misclassification in logistic regression: an illustration.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Li Tang; Hillary M Superak; Caroline C King; David D Celentano; Yungtai Lo; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Diet, lifestyle, and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women.

Authors:  F B Hu; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; G Colditz; S Liu; C G Solomon; W C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Age at menarche and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from 2 large prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Chunyan He; Cuilin Zhang; David J Hunter; Susan E Hankinson; Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Statin use and risk of diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Annie L Culver; Ira S Ockene; Raji Balasubramanian; Barbara C Olendzki; Deidre M Sepavich; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Joann E Manson; Yongxia Qiao; Simin Liu; Philip A Merriam; Catherine Rahilly-Tierny; Fridtjof Thomas; Jeffrey S Berger; Judith K Ockene; J David Curb; Yunsheng Ma
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-09

10.  Validity of diabetes self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative: comparison with medication inventories and fasting glucose measurements.

Authors:  Karen L Margolis; Robert Brzyski; Denise E Bonds; Barbara V Howard; Sarah Kempainen; Jennifer G Robinson; Monika M Safford; Lesley T Tinker; Lawrence S Phillips
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

View more
  6 in total

1.  Errors in multiple variables in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cohort and electronic health record data: statistical challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Bryan E Shepherd; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Stat Commun Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-07

2.  An approximate quasi-likelihood approach for error-prone failure time outcomes and exposures.

Authors:  Lillian A Boe; Lesley F Tinker; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Interval-censored data with misclassification: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Magda Carvalho Pires; Enrico Antônio Colosimo; Guilherme Augusto Veloso; Raquel de Souza Borges Ferreira
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  Study design for non-recurring, time-to-event outcomes in the presence of error-prone diagnostic tests or self-reports.

Authors:  Xiangdong Gu; Raji Balasubramanian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  SEMIPARAMETRIC TIME TO EVENT MODELS IN THE PRESENCE OF ERROR-PRONE, SELF-REPORTED OUTCOMES-WITH APPLICATION TO THE WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVE.

Authors:  Xiangdong Gu; Yunsheng Ma; Raji Balasubramanian
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Bayesian variable selection for high dimensional predictors and self-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Xiangdong Gu; Mahlet G Tadesse; Andrea S Foulkes; Yunsheng Ma; Raji Balasubramanian
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.