Literature DB >> 26831540

The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers.

Tomohiro Banno1, Daisuke Togawa2, Hideyuki Arima2, Tomohiko Hasegawa2, Yu Yamato2, Sho Kobayashi2, Tatsuya Yasuda2, Shin Oe2, Hironobu Hoshino2, Yukihiro Matsuyama2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and global tilt (GT) are spinopelvic parameters that account for trunk anteversion and pelvic retroversion. To investigate spinopelvic parameters, especially TPA and GT, in Japanese adults and determine norms for each parameter related to health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-six volunteers (262 men and 394 women) aged 50-92 years (mean, 72.8 years) were enrolled in this study. The incidence of vertebral fracture, spondylolisthesis and coronal malalignment were measured. Five spinopelvic parameters (TPA, GT, sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic tilt [PT], and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]) were measured using whole spine standing radiographs. The mean values for each parameter were estimated by sex and decade of life. HRQOL measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D), were also obtained. Pearson's correlation coefficients were determined between each parameter and HRQOL measure. Moreover, the factors contributing to the QOL score were calculated using logistic regression with age, sex, the existence of vertebral fracture and spondylolisthesis, coronal malalignment (coronal curve >30°) and sagittal malalignment (SVA >95 mm) as explanatory variables and the presence of disability (ODI >40) as a free variable.
RESULTS: The mean values for the spinopelvic parameters were as follows: TPA, 17.9°; GT, 23.2°; SVA, 50.2 mm; PT, 18.6°; and PI-LL, 7.5°. TPA and GT strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.990) and with the other spinopelvic parameters. TPA and GT correlated with ODI (r = 0.339, r = 0.348, respectively) and EQ-5D (r = -0.285, r = -0.288, respectively), similar to those for SVA. TPA, GT, PT, and PI-LL were significantly higher in women than in men. PT and PI-LL gradually increased with age, while TPA, GT, and SVA tended to deteriorate after the 7th decade. Based on a logistic regression analysis, the deterioration of ODI was mostly affected by the sagittal malalignment. The TPA and GT cut-off values for severe disability (ODI >40) based on linear regression modeling were 26.0° and 33.7°, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We determined reference values for spinopelvic parameters in elderly volunteers. Similar to SVA, TPA and GT correlated with HRQOL. TPA, GT, PT, and PI-LL were worse in women and progressed with age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Cohort study; Global tilt; Reference value; Spinopelvic parameter; T1-pelvic angle

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26831540     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4411-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning.

Authors:  I Obeid; L Boissière; C Yilgor; D Larrieu; F Pellisé; A Alanay; E Acaroglu; F J Perez-Grueso; F Kleinstück; J M Vital; A Bourghli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Colin Nnadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Keith Bridwell; John R Dimar; William Horton; Sigurd Berven; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Global analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in major deformities: correlation between lack of lumbar lordosis and flexion of the knee.

Authors:  Ibrahim Obeid; Olivier Hauger; Stéphane Aunoble; Anouar Bourghli; Nicolas Pellet; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Normal patterns of sagittal alignment of the spine in young adults radiological analysis in a Korean population.

Authors:  Chong Suh Lee; Sung Soo Chung; Kyung Chung Kang; Se Jun Park; Seong Kee Shin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar X-rays.

Authors:  Michiel M A Janssen; Xavier Drevelle; Ludovic Humbert; Wafa Skalli; René M Castelein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Richard Hostin; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Douglas C Burton; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher P Ames; Khaled Kebaish; Robert A Hart; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Wafa Skalli; Nicola Hawkinson; Pierre-Marie Gagey; Stephen Ondra; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  21 in total

1.  Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity.

Authors:  Jacob Januszewski; Andrew C Vivas; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

2.  Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning.

Authors:  I Obeid; L Boissière; C Yilgor; D Larrieu; F Pellisé; A Alanay; E Acaroglu; F J Perez-Grueso; F Kleinstück; J M Vital; A Bourghli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cut-off values of and factors associated with a negative influence on Neck Disability Index.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Daisuke Togawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Yu Yamato; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Yuki Mihara; Hiroki Ushirozako; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Relationship between severity of knee osteoarthritis and radiography findings of lower limbs: A cross-sectional study from the TOEI survey.

Authors:  Mitsuru Hanada; Hironobu Hoshino; Hiroshi Koyama; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09

5.  The global alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: our experience using the EOS full-body images.

Authors:  Jean Yves Lazennec; Dominique Folinais; Samy Bendaya; Marc Antoine Rousseau; Aidin Eslam Pour
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-08-30

6.  Differences in lumbar and pelvic parameters among African American, Caucasian and Asian populations.

Authors:  Hideyuki Arima; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; Yu Yamato; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Pierre Roussouly; Brandon Cook; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effects of mirror placement on sagittal alignment of the spine during acquisition of full-spine standing X-Rays.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Daisuke Togawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Yu Yamato; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Yuki Mihara; Hiroki Ushirozako; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Age-based normal sagittal alignment in Chinese asymptomatic adults: establishment of the relationships between pelvic incidence and other parameters.

Authors:  Siyu Zhou; Fei Xu; Wei Wang; Da Zou; Zhuoran Sun; Weishi Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The influence of sagittal pelvic malrotation on transverse acetabular ligament guided cup orientation: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tingxian Ling; Zichuan Ding; Mingcheng Yuan; Kai Zhou; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A Longitudinal Study of Lumbar Sagittal Change in Middle-Aged Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Kenyu Ito; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Hiroaki Nakashima; Yukihiro Hasegawa; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2020-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.