Literature DB >> 19927088

Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar X-rays.

Michiel M A Janssen1, Xavier Drevelle, Ludovic Humbert, Wafa Skalli, René M Castelein.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A three-dimensional analysis of spino-pelvic alignment in 60 asymptomatic young adult males and females.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the differences in sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in a group of asymptomatic young adult males and females and describe gender specific reference values. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several spinal disorders like idiopathic scoliosis and Scheuermann's disease have a well-known sex-related prevalence ratio. As spino-pelvic alignment plays an important role in spinal biomechanics, it is imperative to analyze possible differences between the male and female spino-pelvic alignment. Furthermore, in spinal fusion surgery, normal sagittal balance should be recreated as closely as possible.
METHODS: An innovative biplanar ultra low-dose radiographic technique was used to obtain three-dimensional reconstructions of the spine (T1-L5), sacrum, and pelvis in a freestanding position of 30 asymptomatic young male and 30 young female adults. Values were calculated for thoracic kyphosis (T4-T12), lumbar lordosis (L1-S1), total and regional lumbopelvic lordosis (PRT12, PRL2, PRL4, and PRL5), sagittal plumb line of T1, T4, and T9 (HAT1, HAT4, and HAT9), T1-L5 sagittal spinal inclination, T9 sagittal offset, and pelvic parameters (pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence). In addition, vertebral inclination in the sagittal plane of each vertebra was measured. Differences in spino-pelvic alignment between the sexes were analyzed.
RESULTS: The female spine was more dorsally inclined (11 degrees vs. 8 degrees ; P = 0.003). High thoracic and thoracolumbar vertebrae were more dorsally inclined in women than in men. Thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, regional lumbopelvic lordosis, sagittal plumb lines, T9 sagittal offset, and pelvic parameters were not statistically different between the sexes.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the female spine is definitely different from the male spine. The spine as whole and individual vertebrae in certain regions of the normal spine is more backwardly inclined in females than in males. Based on our previous research this signifies that these spinal regions are subjected to different biomechanical loading conditions. These vertebral segments are possibly less rotationally stable in females than in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19927088     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9fd85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  41 in total

1.  Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; P Roussouly; E Berthonnaud; P Guigui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pelvic incidence: an anatomic investigation of 880 cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; William Z Morris; Jeremy J Gebhart; Raymond W Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Posture class prediction of pre-peak height velocity subjects according to gross body segment orientations using linear discriminant analysis.

Authors:  Mieke Dolphens; Barbara Cagnie; Pascal Coorevits; Andry Vleeming; Tanneke Palmans; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Chaléat-Valayer; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Jérôme Paquet; Eric Berthonnaud; Fabienne Siani; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Determination of the amount of leg length inequality that alters spinal posture in healthy subjects using rasterstereography.

Authors:  Marcel Betsch; Walter Rapp; Anna Przibylla; Pascal Jungbluth; Mohssen Hakimi; Johannes Schneppendahl; Simon Thelen; Michael Wild
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Relationship between the alpha and beta angles in diagnosing CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement on frog-leg lateral radiographs.

Authors:  Moin Khan; Anil Ranawat; Dale Williams; Rajiv Gandhi; Hema Choudur; Naveen Parasu; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Are there gender differences in sagittal spinal pelvic inclination before and after the adolescent pubertal growth spurt?

Authors:  Weijun Wang; Zhiwei Wang; Zhen Liu; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun; Tsz Ping Lam; Jack Chun-yiu Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Morphological and postural sexual dimorphism of the lumbar spine facilitates greater lordosis in females.

Authors:  Jeannie F Bailey; Carolyn J Sparrey; Ella Been; Patricia A Kramer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Foot posture, foot function and low back pain: the Framingham Foot Study.

Authors:  Hylton B Menz; Alyssa B Dufour; Jody L Riskowski; Howard J Hillstrom; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Simple prediction method of lumbar lordosis for planning of lumbar corrective surgery: radiological analysis in a Korean population.

Authors:  Chong Suh Lee; Sung Soo Chung; Se Jun Park; Dong Min Kim; Seong Kee Shin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.