Literature DB >> 26831477

What Happens to the Articular Surface After Curettage for Epiphyseal Chondroblastoma? A Report on Functional Results, Arthritis, and Arthroplasty.

Germán L Farfalli1, Pablo A I Slullitel1, D Luis Muscolo1, Miguel A Ayerza1, Luis A Aponte-Tinao2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chondroblastoma is an uncommon, benign, but locally aggressive bone tumor that occurs in the apophyses or epiphyses of long bones, primarily in young patients. Although some are treated with large resections, aggressive curettage and bone grafting are more commonly performed to preserve the involved joint. Such intralesional resection may result in damage to the growth plate and articular cartilage, which can result in painful arthritis. Prior studies have focused primarily on oncologic outcomes rather than long-term joint status and functional outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What local complications can be expected after aggressive intralesional curettage of epiphyseal chondroblastoma? (2) What is the joint survival of a joint treated in this way for chondroblastoma? (3) What additional procedures are used in treating symptomatic joint osteoarthritis after treatment of the chondroblastoma? (4) What are the functional outcomes in this group of patients?
METHODS: A retrospective study of our prospectively collected database between 1975 and 2013 was done. We found 64 patients with a diagnosis of chondroblastoma of bone. After applying our selection criteria, 53 patients were involved in this study. We excluded seven patients with tumors initially treated with en bloc resection (five located in the extremities and two in the axial skeleton) and two patients with apophyseal tumors. One patient who underwent nonsurgical treatment and one patient lost to followup were also excluded. The mean age was 18 years (range, 11-39 years); the minimum followup was 2 years with a mean followup 77 months (range, 24-213 months). We analyzed all patients with a diagnosis of epiphyseal chondroblastoma of the limb treated with aggressive curettage and joint preservation surgery. During the period in question, our general indications for curettage were patients with active, painful tumors and those with more aggressive ones that remained intracompartmental, whereas initial wide en bloc resection was indicated in patients who had tumors with an extracompartmental extension breaching the adjacent joint cartilage and massive articular destruction. The tumor location was the distal femur in 14 patients, proximal tibia in 11, proximal humerus in 10, proximal femur in eight, the talus in seven, and elsewhere in the lower extremity in three. Local complications including joint degeneration and tumor recurrence were evaluated. Based on radiographic analysis, secondary osteoarthritis was classified by using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system from Grade 0 to Grade IV. Patients who underwent joint replacement resulting from advanced symptomatic osteoarthritis were considered to have had joint failure for purposes of survivorship analysis, which was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Functional results were evaluated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score by the treating surgeon, who transcribed the results on the digital records every 6 months of followup.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (42%) developed 26 local complications. The most common local complication was osteoarthritis in 20 patients (77% [20 of 26 complications]); tumor recurrence was observed in four patients; an intraarticular fracture and superficial infection treated with surgical débridement and antibiotics developed in one patient each. Joint survival was 90% at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 76%-100%) and 74% at 10 years (95% CI, 48%-100%). Proximal femoral tumor location was associated with lower survivorship of the joint than other locations showing a 5-year survival rate of 44% (95% CI, 0%-88%; p = 0.000). Of the 20 patients with osteoarthritis, four were symptomatic enough to undergo joint replacement, all of which were for tumors in the proximal femur. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score was 28 of 30 points (93%).
CONCLUSIONS: Osteoarthritis was a frequent complication of aggressive curettage of epiphyseal chondroblastoma, and tumors located in the proximal femur appeared to be at particular risk of secondary osteoarthritis and prosthetic replacement. Because chondroblastoma is a tumor that disproportionately affects younger patients, the patient and surgeon should be aware that arthroplasty at a young age is a potential outcome for treatment of proximal femoral chondroblastomas. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26831477      PMCID: PMC5289155          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4715-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  A clinically relevant review of hip biomechanics.

Authors:  Karl F Bowman; Jeremy Fox; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Clinical and radiological long-term results after operative treatment of chondroblastoma.

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Daniela Witte; Stefan Weiss
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Primary open reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip using a median adductor approach.

Authors:  A B Ferguson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Epiphysial chondroblastoma of bone. A clinico-pathological study of sixty-nine cases.

Authors:  F Schajowicz; H Gallardo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1970-05

6.  Growth after extendible endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur.

Authors:  W P Cool; S R Carter; R J Grimer; R M Tillman; P S Walker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-11

7.  Chondroblastoma. A review of seventy cases.

Authors:  D S Springfield; R Capanna; F Gherlinzoni; P Picci; M Campanacci
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Image guided radiofrequency thermo-ablation therapy of chondroblastomas: should it replace surgery?

Authors:  Radhesh K Lalam; Gillian L Cribb; Bernard J Tins; Wim P Cool; Jaspreet Singh; Prudencia N M Tyrrell; Victor N Cassar-Pullicino
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Chondroblastoma of bone in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Frédéric Sailhan; Franck Chotel; Roger Parot
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Chondroblastoma: radiofrequency ablation--alternative to surgical resection in selected cases.

Authors:  Leon D Rybak; Daniel I Rosenthal; James C Wittig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [Chondroblastoma].

Authors:  G Jundt; D Baumhoer
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Intra-articular benign bone lesions treated with Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS): imaging follow-up and clinical results.

Authors:  Francesco Arrigoni; Antonio Barile; Luigi Zugaro; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Ferdinando Caranci; Anna Maria Ierardi; Chiara Floridi; Alessio Salvatore Angileri; Alfonso Reginelli; Luca Brunese; Carlo Masciocchi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Minimally invasive treatments of painful bone lesions: state of the art.

Authors:  Antonio Barile; Francesco Arrigoni; Luigi Zugaro; Marcello Zappia; Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Julien Garnon; Nitin Ramamurthy; Luca Brunese; Afshin Gangi; Carlo Masciocchi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  The effects of surgical treatment with chondroblastoma in children and adolescents in open epiphyseal plate of long bones.

Authors:  Yan Xiong; Yun Lang; Zeping Yu; Hongyuan Liu; Xiang Fang; Chongqi Tu; Hong Duan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Bone combined cement grafting in giant cell tumor around the knee reduces mechanical failure.

Authors:  Wangsiyuan Teng; Peng Lin; Yong Li; Xiaobo Yan; Hengyuan Li; Binghao Li; Zhan Wang; Yan Wu; Shengdong Wang; Xingzhi Zhou; Zenan Wang; Zhaoming Ye
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Have the difficulties and complications of surgical treatment for chondroblastoma of the adjoining knee joint been overestimated?

Authors:  Qing Liu; Hongbo He; Yuhao Yuan; Hao Zeng; Feng Long; Jian Tian; Wei Luo
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.072

7.  Reply to the letter to the editor concerning the article "clinical outcomes of chondroblastoma treated using synthetic bone substitute: risk factors for developing radiographic joint degeneration".

Authors:  Hidetatsu Outani; Shigeki Kakunaga; Yoshinori Imura; Takafumi Ueda
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Surgical treatment of benign osteolytic lesions in the femoral head and neck: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jingtian Shi; Zhiqing Zhao; Taiqiang Yan; Wei Guo; Rongli Yang; Xiaodong Tang; Huayi Qu; Sen Dong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Eight-Year Follow-Up Using a Fresh Osteochondral Allograft for a Femoral Head Chondroblastoma in a 17-Year-Old Patient.

Authors:  Louis-Charles Moreau; Philippe Beauchamp-Chalifour; Etienne L Belzile; Norbert Dion
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-09-09

10.  [Treatment of chondroblastoma of the humeral head : A tumour- and shoulder-orthopaedic challenge].

Authors:  Sebastian Oenning; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Georg Gosheger; Christoph Theil; Friederike Müller; Niklas Deventer; Timo Lübben
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.