Literature DB >> 25809289

Delay from biopsy to radical prostatectomy influences the rate of adverse pathologic outcomes.

William T Berg1, Matthew R Danzig1, Jamie S Pak1, Ruslan Korets1, Arindam RoyChoudhury2, Gregory Hruby1, Mitchell C Benson1, James M McKiernan1, Ketan K Badani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine maximum wait times between biopsy diagnosis and surgery for localized prostate cancer, beyond which the rate of adverse pathologic outcomes is increased.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 4,610 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between 1990 and 2011. Patients were stratified by biopsy Gleason score and PSA value. For each stratification, χ2 analysis was used to determine the smallest 15-day multiple of surgical delay (e.g., 15, 30, 45…180 days) for which adverse pathologic outcomes were significantly more likely after the time interval than before. Adverse outcomes were defined as positive surgical margins, upgrading from biopsy, upstaging, seminal vesicle invasion, or positive lymph nodes.
RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred twelve patients met inclusion criteria. Median delay was 64 days (mean 76, SD 47). One thousand six hundred seventy-five (75.7%), 537 (24.3%), and 60 (2.7%) patients had delays of <=90, >90, and >180 days, respectively. Twenty-six percent were upgraded on final pathology and 23% were upstaged. The positive surgical margin rate was 24.2% and the positive lymph node rate was 1.1%. Significant increases in the proportion of adverse pathological outcomes were found beyond 75 days in the overall cohort (P = 0.03), 150 days for patients with Gleason <=6, and PSA 0-10 (P = 0.038), 60 days for patients with Gleason 7 and PSA >20 (P = 0.032), and 30 days for patients with Gleason 8-10 and PSA 11-20 (0.041).
CONCLUSION: In low-risk disease, there is a considerable but not unlimited surgical delay which will not adversely impact the rate of adverse pathologic features found. In higher risk disease, this time period is considerably shorter.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prostatectomy; surgical pathology; time-to-treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25809289     DOI: 10.1002/pros.22992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  16 in total

1.  One-Stop MRI and MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: an expedited pathway for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Alessandro Tafuri; Akbar N Ashrafi; Suzanne Palmer; Aliasger Shakir; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Atsuko Iwata; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Jie Cai; Akash Sali; Chhavi Gupta; Luis G Medina; Mariana C Stern; Vinay Duddalwar; Manju Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Andre Abreu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Robotic prostatectomy and access to care: Canadian vs. U.S. experience.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Marc Zanaty; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect patient pathological outcome? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Kelsey Lawson; Mounsif Azizi; Emad Rajih; Abdullah Alenizi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Malek Meskawi; Cedric Lebacle; Thierry Lebeau; Serge Benayoun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Gleason grade accuracy of transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsies in MRI-naïve patients.

Authors:  Liang G Qu; Modher Al-Shawi; Tess Howard; Nathan Papa; Cedric Poyet; Brian Kelly; A J Matthew Egan; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Damien Bolton; Gregory S Jack
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Is time from diagnosis to radical prostatectomy associated with oncological outcomes?

Authors:  Kirsti Aas; Sophie Dorothea Fosså; Rune Kvåle; Bjørn Møller; Tor Åge Myklebust; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Stig Müller; Viktor Berge
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Khaled Ajib; Kelsey Lawson; Mounsif Azizi; Emad Rajih; Abdullah Alenizi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Côme Tolmier; Malek Meskawi; Fred Saad; Raisa S Pompe; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  [Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Diagnostic and treatment factors associated with poor survival from prostate cancer are differentially distributed between regional and metropolitan Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Fanny Sampurno; Jeremy Millar; Mark Frydenberg; Sue Evans
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Risk score predicts high-grade prostate cancer in DNA-methylation positive, histopathologically negative biopsies.

Authors:  Leander Van Neste; Alan W Partin; Grant D Stewart; Jonathan I Epstein; David J Harrison; Wim Van Criekinge
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ekaterina Laukhtina; Reza Sari Motlagh; Keiichiro Mori; Fahad Quhal; Victor M Schuettfort; Hadi Mostafaei; Satoshi Katayama; Nico C Grossmann; Guillaume Ploussard; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Mohammad Abufaraj; Dmitry Enikeev; Benjamin Pradere; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.