| Literature DB >> 26830689 |
Samia Boussaa1,2, Kholoud Kahime3, Abdallah M Samy4, Abdelkrim Ben Salem5, Ali Boumezzough6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is one of the most neglected tropical diseases in Morocco. Leishmania major and L. tropica are the main culprits identified in all endemic foci across the country. These two etiological agents are transmitted by Phlebotomus papatasi and P. sergenti, the two most prevalent sand fly species in Morocco. Previous studies reflected gaps of knowledge regarding the environmental fingerprints that affect the distribution of these two potential vectors across Morocco.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26830689 PMCID: PMC4736259 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1343-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Regional and local map of the study sites. Dashed rectangle indicates the region sampled across Morocco and a blue cross reveals the sand fly sampling sites
Phlebotomine Sand flies collected by sticky paper traps in several districts across Morocco from April to June 2013. These districts represent the cutaneous leishmaniasis endemic areas in Morocco
| Species | Number of collected flies (F : M) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guelmim-Smara | Marrakech-Tensift-Al Haouz | Meknes-Tafilalete | Souss-Massa-Draa | Tadla-zilal | Total | Ratio (F : M) | |
|
| 18/103 | 167/557 | 4/17 | 90/523 | 17/45 | 296/1245 | 1:4.2 |
|
| 57/174 | 98/425 | 19/106 | 166/572 | 3/11 | 343/1288 | 1:3.75 |
|
| 2/15 | 372/1141 | 0/0 | 15/67 | 29/47 | 418/1270 | 1:3.03 |
|
| 8/22 | 158/509 | 0/5 | 182/473 | 11/22 | 359/1031 | 1:2.87 |
|
| 0/4 | 103/193 | 0/0 | 5/29 | 0/0 | 108/226 | 1:2.09 |
|
| 1/22 | 4/31 | 6/56 | 13/44 | 0/0 | 24/153 | 1:6.37 |
|
| 0/16 | 0/0 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0/22 | 0 |
|
| 16/102 | 477/1098 | 2/5 | 97/277 | 223/356 | 815/1838 | 1:2.25 |
|
| 3/22 | 359/918 | 9/34 | 162/409 | 31/106 | 564/1489 | 1:2.64 |
|
| 2/16 | 28/85 | 2/4 | 19/33 | 0/0 | 51/138 | 1:2.70 |
|
| 7/14 | 0/0 | 1/11 | 1/5 | 0/0 | 9/30 | 1:3.33 |
| Total | 114/510 | 1766/4957 | 43/241 | 750/2435 | 314/587 | 2987/8730 | 1:2.92 |
Fig. 2Densities of Phlebotomus papatasi (PP) and P. sergenti (PS) in 48 sites sampled across Morocco in relation to the changes in day-time and night-time minimum temperature
Fig. 3Densities of Phlebotomus papatasi (PP) and P. sergenti (PS) in 48 sites sampled across Morocco in relation to the changes in minimum and maximum normalized difference vegetation index
Correlations of climatic, elevation, soil and vegetation index with the sand fly vector densities in 48 stations across Morocco. The correlations examined the relationship between male and female Phlebotomus papatasi and Phlebotomus sergenti densities to these environmental factors. Pearson correlation coefficient is presented in the table with P values between brackets
| Variable |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| Climate | ||||
| Minimum temperature (night-time) | 0.289 (0.047)a | 0.315 (0.029)a | −0.005 (0.97) | 0.001 (0.994) |
| Maximum temperature (night-time) | 0.387 (0.007)a | 0.423 (0.003)a | 0.133 (0.368) | 0.017 (0.909) |
| Mean temperature (night-time) | 0.385 (0.007)a | 0.406 (0.004)a | 0.082 (0.58) | 0.011 (0.942) |
| Minimum temperature (day-time) | 0.304 (0.035)a | 0.425 (0.003)a | 0.008 (0.958) | −0.164 (0.267) |
| Maximum temperature (day-time) | 0.127 (0.391) | 0.257 (0.077) | −0.006 (0.967) | −0.139 (0.346) |
| Mean temperature (day-time) | 0.204 (0.165) | 0.338 (0.019)a | 0.001 (0.996) | −0.162 (0.272) |
| Maximum precipitation | −0.224 (0.126) | −0.181 (0.219) | −0.075 (0.610) | −0.082 (0.580) |
| Mean precipitation | −0.134 (0.364) | −0.115 (0.436) | −0.005 (0.974) | −0.110 (0.458) |
| Mean aridity | −0.402 (0.005)a | −0.369 (0.010)a | −0.106 (0.473) | −0.018 (0.903) |
| Greenness | ||||
| Minimum NDVI | −0.064 (0.663) | −0.164 (0.264) | 0.167 (0.258) | 0.365 (0.011)a |
| Maximum NDVI | −0.137 (0.352) | −0.226 (0.123) | 0.095 (0.521) | 0.296 (0.04)a |
| Mean NDVI | −0.096 (0.515) | −0.189 (0.199) | 0.130 (0.379) | 0.335 (0.020)a |
| Altitude | ||||
| Altitude | −0.192 (0.190) | −0.171 (0.244) | 0.059 (0.693) | 0.009 (0.954) |
| Soil | ||||
| PH | −0.172 (0.241) | −0.412 (0.004)a | −0.193 (0.189) | 0.022 (0.882) |
| Silt content | 0.002 (0.989) | −0.121 (0.414) | 0.049 (0.741) | −0.003 (0.985) |
| Clay content | 0.007 (0.964) | −0.159 (0.279) | 0.074 (0.619) | 0.019 (0.895) |
| Sand content | −0.018 (0.905) | −0.168 (0.255) | 0.021 (0.887) | −0.005 (0.975) |
| Bulk density | 0.022 (0.880) | −0.134 (0.365) | 0.062 (0.673) | 0.021 (0.886) |
| Soil water stress | −0.399 (0.005)a | −0.372 (0.009)a | −0.103 (0.485) | −0.019 (0.900) |
a significance level (α) = 0.05
Fig. 4Fluctuation of sand fly densities in response to changes in aridity index across Morocco. The longitude of the sampling sites is presented on the horizontal axis