Literature DB >> 26829039

Skin Microbiome Surveys Are Strongly Influenced by Experimental Design.

Jacquelyn S Meisel1, Geoffrey D Hannigan1, Amanda S Tyldsley1, Adam J SanMiguel1, Brendan P Hodkinson1, Qi Zheng1, Elizabeth A Grice2.   

Abstract

Culture-independent studies to characterize skin microbiota are increasingly common, due in part to affordable and accessible sequencing and analysis platforms. Compared to culture-based techniques, DNA sequencing of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene or whole metagenome shotgun (WMS) sequencing provides more precise microbial community characterizations. Most widely used protocols were developed to characterize microbiota of other habitats (i.e., gastrointestinal) and have not been systematically compared for their utility in skin microbiome surveys. Here we establish a resource for the cutaneous research community to guide experimental design in characterizing skin microbiota. We compare two widely sequenced regions of the 16S rRNA gene to WMS sequencing for recapitulating skin microbiome community composition, diversity, and genetic functional enrichment. We show that WMS sequencing most accurately recapitulates microbial communities, but sequencing of hypervariable regions 1-3 of the 16S rRNA gene provides highly similar results. Sequencing of hypervariable region 4 poorly captures skin commensal microbiota, especially Propionibacterium. WMS sequencing, which is resource and cost intensive, provides evidence of a community's functional potential; however, metagenome predictions based on 16S rRNA sequence tags closely approximate WMS genetic functional profiles. This study highlights the importance of experimental design for downstream results in skin microbiome surveys.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26829039      PMCID: PMC4842136          DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  33 in total

1.  The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters.

Authors:  Kjersti Aagaard; Joseph Petrosino; Wendy Keitel; Mark Watson; James Katancik; Nathalia Garcia; Shital Patel; Mary Cutting; Tessa Madden; Holli Hamilton; Emily Harris; Dirk Gevers; Gina Simone; Pamela McInnes; James Versalovic
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Evaluation of 16S rDNA-based community profiling for human microbiome research.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Metabolic reconstruction for metagenomic data and its application to the human microbiome.

Authors:  Sahar Abubucker; Nicola Segata; Johannes Goll; Alyxandria M Schubert; Jacques Izard; Brandi L Cantarel; Beltran Rodriguez-Mueller; Jeremy Zucker; Mathangi Thiagarajan; Bernard Henrissat; Owen White; Scott T Kelley; Barbara Methé; Patrick D Schloss; Dirk Gevers; Makedonka Mitreva; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Species-level analysis of DNA sequence data from the NIH Human Microbiome Project.

Authors:  Sean Conlan; Heidi H Kong; Julia A Segre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer microbiome is associated with clinical factors.

Authors:  Sue E Gardner; Stephen L Hillis; Kris Heilmann; Julia A Segre; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  The microbiome extends to subepidermal compartments of normal skin.

Authors:  Teruaki Nakatsuji; Hsin-I Chiang; Shangi B Jiang; Harish Nagarajan; Karsten Zengler; Richard L Gallo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Propionibacterium acnes strain populations in the human skin microbiome associated with acne.

Authors:  Sorel Fitz-Gibbon; Shuta Tomida; Bor-Han Chiu; Lin Nguyen; Christine Du; Minghsun Liu; David Elashoff; Marie C Erfe; Anya Loncaric; Jenny Kim; Robert L Modlin; Jeff F Miller; Erica Sodergren; Noah Craft; George M Weinstock; Huiying Li
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin.

Authors:  Keisha Findley; Julia Oh; Joy Yang; Sean Conlan; Clayton Deming; Jennifer A Meyer; Deborah Schoenfeld; Effie Nomicos; Morgan Park; Heidi H Kong; Julia A Segre
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences.

Authors:  Morgan G I Langille; Jesse Zaneveld; J Gregory Caporaso; Daniel McDonald; Dan Knights; Joshua A Reyes; Jose C Clemente; Deron E Burkepile; Rebecca L Vega Thurber; Rob Knight; Robert G Beiko; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 10.  Computational meta'omics for microbial community studies.

Authors:  Nicola Segata; Daniela Boernigen; Timothy L Tickle; Xochitl C Morgan; Wendy S Garrett; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  103 in total

1.  Topical Antimicrobial Treatments Can Elicit Shifts to Resident Skin Bacterial Communities and Reduce Colonization by Staphylococcus aureus Competitors.

Authors:  Adam J SanMiguel; Jacquelyn S Meisel; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Details Matter: Designing Skin Microbiome Studies.

Authors:  Heidi H Kong
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 3.  [General aspects regarding the skin microbiome].

Authors:  R Mikolajczyk; L M Roesner
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Induces a Transmissible Dysbiotic Skin Microbiota that Promotes Skin Inflammation.

Authors:  Ciara Gimblet; Jacquelyn S Meisel; Michael A Loesche; Stephen D Cole; Joseph Horwinski; Fernanda O Novais; Ana M Misic; Charles W Bradley; Daniel P Beiting; Shelley C Rankin; Lucas P Carvalho; Edgar M Carvalho; Phillip Scott; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 21.023

5.  Ecological Correlates of Large-Scale Turnover in the Dominant Members of Pseudacris crucifer Skin Bacterial Communities.

Authors:  Myra C Hughey; Eric R Sokol; Jenifer B Walke; Matthew H Becker; Lisa K Belden
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  The Role of the Skin and Gut Microbiome in Psoriatic Disease.

Authors:  Di Yan; Naiem Issa; Ladan Afifi; Caleb Jeon; Hsin Wen Chang; Wilson Liao
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2017-04-22

Review 7.  Performing Skin Microbiome Research: A Method to the Madness.

Authors:  Heidi H Kong; Björn Andersson; Thomas Clavel; John E Common; Scott A Jackson; Nathan D Olson; Julia A Segre; Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Topical Decolonization Does Not Eradicate the Skin Microbiota of Community-Dwelling or Hospitalized Adults.

Authors:  C A Burnham; Patrick G Hogan; Meghan A Wallace; Elena Deych; William Shannon; David K Warren; Stephanie A Fritz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Antiseptic Agents Elicit Short-Term, Personalized, and Body Site-Specific Shifts in Resident Skin Bacterial Communities.

Authors:  Adam J SanMiguel; Jacquelyn S Meisel; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Charles W Bradley; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Temporal Stability in Chronic Wound Microbiota Is Associated With Poor Healing.

Authors:  Michael Loesche; Sue E Gardner; Lindsay Kalan; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Brendan P Hodkinson; Amanda S Tyldsley; Carrie L Franciscus; Stephen L Hillis; Samir Mehta; David J Margolis; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 8.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.