Literature DB >> 32835823

Curvature processing in human visual cortical areas.

Xiaomin Yue1, Sophia Robert2, Leslie G Ungerleider3.   

Abstract

Curvature is one of many visual features shown to be important for visual perception. We recently showed that curvilinear features provide sufficient information for categorizing animate vs. inanimate objects, while rectilinear features do not (Zachariou et al., 2018). Results from our fMRI study in rhesus monkeys (Yue et al., 2014) have shed light on some of the neural substrates underlying curvature processing by revealing a network of visual cortical patches with a curvature response preference. However, it is unknown whether a similar network exists in human visual cortex. Thus, the current study was designed to investigate cortical areas with a preference for curvature in the human brain using fMRI at 7T. Consistent with our monkey fMRI results, we found a network of curvature preferring cortical patches-some of which overlapped well-known face-selective areas. Moreover, principal component analysis (PCA) using all visually-responsive voxels indicated that curvilinear features of visual stimuli were associated with specific retinotopic regions in visual cortex. Regions associated with positive curvilinear PC values encompassed the central visual field representation of early visual areas and the lateral surface of temporal cortex, while those associated with negative curvilinear PC values encompassed the peripheral visual field representation of early visual areas and the medial surface of temporal cortex. Thus, we found that broad areas of curvature preference, which encompassed face-selective areas, were bound by central visual field representations. Our results support the hypothesis that curvilinearity preference interacts with central-peripheral processing biases as primary features underlying the organization of temporal cortex topography in the adult human brain.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curvature patches; FFA; MT; OFA; PPA; aIT

Year:  2020        PMID: 32835823      PMCID: PMC7885662          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  49 in total

1.  Curvature discontinuities are cues for rapid shape analysis.

Authors:  A Kristjánsson; P U Tse
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

2.  Center-periphery organization of human object areas.

Authors:  I Levy; U Hasson; G Avidan; T Hendler; R Malach
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Scott L Brincat; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-04       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment.

Authors:  R Epstein; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception.

Authors:  N Kanwisher; J McDermott; M M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Thinking outside the box: rectilinear shapes selectively activate scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Cesar E Echavarria; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex.

Authors:  E Kobatake; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  How the Human Brain Represents Perceived Dangerousness or "Predacity" of Animals.

Authors:  Andrew C Connolly; Long Sha; J Swaroop Guntupalli; Nikolaas Oosterhof; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Samuel A Nastase; Matteo Visconti di Oleggio Castello; Hervé Abdi; Barbara C Jobst; M Ida Gobbini; James V Haxby
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Why is real-world visual object recognition hard?

Authors:  Nicolas Pinto; David D Cox; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  7 in total

1.  Selective responses to faces, scenes, and bodies in the ventral visual pathway of infants.

Authors:  Heather L Kosakowski; Michael A Cohen; Atsushi Takahashi; Boris Keil; Nancy Kanwisher; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Mid-level Feature Differences Support Early Animacy and Object Size Distinctions: Evidence from Electroencephalography Decoding.

Authors:  Ruosi Wang; Daniel Janini; Talia Konkle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.420

Review 3.  On the relationship between maps and domains in inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Michael J Arcaro; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Real-world size of objects serves as an axis of object space.

Authors:  Taicheng Huang; Yiying Song; Jia Liu
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-07-27

5.  Modeling the tonotopic map using a two-dimensional array of neural oscillators.

Authors:  Dipayan Biswas; V Srinivasa Chakravarthy; Asit Tarsode
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.387

6.  Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects.

Authors:  Erick G Chuquichambi; Letizia Palumbo; Carlos Rey; Enric Munar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Liouville Integrability in a Four-Dimensional Model of the Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Ivan Galyaev; Alexey Mashtakov
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2021-12-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.