Literature DB >> 26826368

Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.

Seema Mutti1, David Hammond1, Jessica L Reid2, Christine M White1, James F Thrasher3,4.   

Abstract

Plain cigarette packaging, which seeks to remove all brand imagery and standardize the shape and size of cigarette packs, represents a novel policy measure to reduce the appeal of cigarettes. Plain packaging has been studied primarily in high-income countries like Australia and the UK. It is unknown whether the effects of plain packaging may differ in low-and-middle income countries with a shorter history of tobacco regulation, such as Mexico. An experimental study was conducted in Mexico City to examine perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among smoking and non-smoking Mexican adolescents (n = 359). Respondents were randomly assigned to a branded or plain pack condition and rated 12 cigarette packages for appeal, taste, harm to health and smoker-image traits. As a behavioral measure of appeal, respondents were offered (although not given) four cigarette packs (either branded or plain) and asked to select one to keep. The findings indicated that branded packs were perceived to be more appealing (β = 3.40, p < 0.001) and to contain better tasting cigarettes (β = 3.53, p < 0.001), but were not perceived as less harmful than plain packs. Participants rated people who smoke the branded packs as having relatively more positive smoker-image traits overall (β = 2.10, p < 0.001), with particularly strong differences found among non-smokers for the traits 'glamorous', 'stylish', 'popular' and 'sophisticated' (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found for the proportion of youth that accepted when offered branded compared with plain packs. These results suggest that plain packaging may reduce brand appeal among Mexican youth, consistent with findings in high-income countries.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low and middle-income countries; marketing; plain packaging; tobacco policy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26826368      PMCID: PMC5914357          DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dav117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  33 in total

1.  The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  M Wakefield; C Morley; J K Horan; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry.

Authors:  S Chapman; B Freeman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Perceptions of plain and branded cigarette packaging among Norwegian youth and adults: a focus group study.

Authors:  Janne Scheffels; Gunnar Sæbø
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Ron Borland; Michael K Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  [Prevalence and risk factors related to sale of cigarettes to minors in stores in Mexico City].

Authors:  Pablo Antonio Kuri-Morales; Mario Cortés-Ramírez; Patricia Cravioto-Quintana
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

6.  "Plain packaging" regulations for tobacco products: the impact of standardizing the color and design of cigarette packs.

Authors:  David Hammond
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2010

7.  Self-reported price of cigarettes, consumption and compensatory behaviours in a cohort of Mexican smokers before and after a cigarette tax increase.

Authors:  Belen Saenz-de-Miera; James F Thrasher; Frank J Chaloupka; Hugh R Waters; Mauricio Hernandez-Avila; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Australian adult smokers' responses to plain packaging with larger graphic health warnings 1 year after implementation: results from a national cross-sectional tracking survey.

Authors:  Melanie Wakefield; Kerri Coomber; Meghan Zacher; Sarah Durkin; Emily Brennan; Michelle Scollo
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents' cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?

Authors:  Victoria White; Tahlia Williams; Agatha Faulkner; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  A cross-sectional analysis of how young adults perceive tobacco brands: implications for FCTC signatories.

Authors:  Philip Gendall; Janet Hoek; Richard Edwards; Judith McCool
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.

Authors:  Ann McNeill; Shannon Gravely; Sara C Hitchman; Linda Bauld; David Hammond; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-27

2.  Assessing cigarette packaging and labelling policy effects on early adolescents: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez; Farahnaz Islam; Yoo Jin Cho; Ramzi George Salloum; Jordan Louviere; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Joaquin Barnoya; Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; James Hardin; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  A systematic review of the perceptions of adolescents on graphic health warnings and plain packaging of cigarettes.

Authors:  Aaron Drovandi; Peta-Ann Teague; Beverley Glass; Bunmi Malau-Aduli
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.