S Chapman1, B Freeman. 1. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia. sc@med.usyd.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In nations with histories of declining smoking prevalence and comprehensive tobacco control policies, smoking-positive cultures have been severely eroded. Smoking, smokers and the tobacco industry are today routinely depicted in everyday discourse and media representations in a variety of overwhelmingly negative ways. Several authors have invoked Erving Goffman's notions of stigmatization to describe the process and impact of this radical transformation, which importantly includes motivating smoking cessation. Efforts to describe nations' progress toward comprehensive tobacco control have hitherto taken little account of the role of cultural change to the meaning of smoking and the many ways in which it has become denormalised. METHODS: This paper identifies a diversity of generally undocumented yet pervasive markers of the "spoiled identity" of smoking, smokers and the tobacco industry, illustrated with examples from Australia, a nation with advanced tobacco control. RESULTS: We caution about some important negative consequences arising from the stigmatization of smokers. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that schemes rating the comprehensiveness of national tobacco control should be supplemented by documentation of markers of this denormalisation.
BACKGROUND: In nations with histories of declining smoking prevalence and comprehensive tobacco control policies, smoking-positive cultures have been severely eroded. Smoking, smokers and the tobacco industry are today routinely depicted in everyday discourse and media representations in a variety of overwhelmingly negative ways. Several authors have invoked Erving Goffman's notions of stigmatization to describe the process and impact of this radical transformation, which importantly includes motivating smoking cessation. Efforts to describe nations' progress toward comprehensive tobacco control have hitherto taken little account of the role of cultural change to the meaning of smoking and the many ways in which it has become denormalised. METHODS: This paper identifies a diversity of generally undocumented yet pervasive markers of the "spoiled identity" of smoking, smokers and the tobacco industry, illustrated with examples from Australia, a nation with advanced tobacco control. RESULTS: We caution about some important negative consequences arising from the stigmatization of smokers. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that schemes rating the comprehensiveness of national tobacco control should be supplemented by documentation of markers of this denormalisation.
Authors: Darren Lau; Calypse Agborsangaya; Fatima Al Sayah; Xiuyun Wu; Arto Ohinmaa; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Laura Nixon; Pamela Mejia; Andrew Cheyne; Cara Wilking; Lori Dorfman; Richard Daynard Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nancy L Fleischer; Paula Lozano; Edna Arillo Santillán; Luz Myriam Reynales Shigematsu; James F Thrasher Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Patrick Hammett; Steven S Fu; David Nelson; Barbara Clothier; Jessie E Saul; Rachel Widome; Elisheva R Danan; Diana J Burgess Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Christina M Pacheco; Anthony Wellever; Niaman Nazir; Joseph Pacheco; Kelly Berryhil; Babalola Faseru; Charles Barnes; Christine M Daley; Won S Choi Journal: J Am Coll Health Date: 2018-02-01