Literature DB >> 26822633

Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism.

Pedro Garcia1, Wilson Ruiz, César Loza Munárriz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition in hospital patients. Considerable controversy is ongoing regarding optimal initial warfarin dosing for patients with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Achieving a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) with warfarin as soon as possible is important because this minimizes the duration of parenteral medication necessary to attain immediate anticoagulation, and it potentially decreases the cost and inconvenience of treatment. Although a 5-mg loading-dose nomogram tends to prevent excessive anticoagulation, a 10-mg loading-dose nomogram may achieve a therapeutic INR more quickly. This is an update of a review first published in 2013.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram compared with a 5-mg warfarin nomogram among patients with VTE. SEARCH
METHODS: For this update the Cochrane Vascular Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched September 2015) and the Cochrane Register of Studies (CENTRAL (2015, Issue 8). Clinical trials databases were also searched. The review authors searched PubMed (last searched 11 June 2015) and LILACS (last searched 11 June 2015). In addition, the review authors contacted pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled studies comparing warfarin initiation nomograms of 10 and 5 mg in patients with VTE. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN
RESULTS: Four trials involving 494 participants were included. Three studies involving 383 participants provided data on the proportion of participants who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day five. Significant benefit of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram was observed (risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.54; moderate quality evidence), although with substantial heterogeneity (I(2) = 90%). The review authors analyzed each study separately because it was not possible to perform a subgroup analysis by inpatient or outpatient status. One study showed significant benefit of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram for the proportion of outpatients with VTE who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day five (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.25), with the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB = 3, 95% CI 2 to 4); another study showed significant benefit of a 5-mg warfarin nomogram in outpatients with VTE (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93) with NNTB = 5 (95% CI 3 to 28); a third study, consisting of both inpatients and outpatients, showed no difference (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.80).No difference was observed in recurrent venous thromboembolism at 90 days when the warfarin nomogram of 10 mg was compared with the warfarin nomogram of 5 mg (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 5.56; 3 studies, 362 participants, low quality evidence); no difference was observed in major bleeding at 14 to 90 days (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.51; 4 studies, 494 participants, moderate quality evidence). No difference was observed in minor bleeding at 14 to 90 days (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.83; 2 studies, 243 participants, very low quality evidence) or in length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD) -2.3 days, 95% CI -7.96 to 3.36; 1 study, 111 participants, low quality evidence). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute thromboembolism (DVT or PE) aged 18 years or older, considerable uncertainty surrounds the use of a 10-mg or a 5-mg loading dose for initiation of warfarin to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 on the fifth day of therapy. Heterogeneity among analyzed studies, mainly caused by differences in types of study participants and length of follow-up, limits certainty surrounding optimal warfarin initiation nomograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26822633      PMCID: PMC8078391          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007699.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  37 in total

Review 1.  American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy.

Authors:  Jack Hirsh; Valentin Fuster; Jack Ansell; Jonathan L Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  High doses of warfarin are more beneficial than its low doses in patients with deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Shervin Farahmand; Morteza Saeedi; Hooman Haji Seyed Javadi; Patricia Khashayar
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Guidelines on oral anticoagulation (warfarin): third edition--2005 update.

Authors:  T P Baglin; D M Keeling; H G Watson
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  A randomized trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses.

Authors:  M A Crowther; J B Ginsberg; C Kearon; L Harrison; J Johnson; M P Massicotte; J Hirsh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-01-11

5.  Comparison of a single end point to determine optimal initial warfarin dosing (5 mg versus 10 mg) for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Rene Quiroz; Marie Gerhard-Herman; Joshua M Kosowsky; Stacia M DeSantis; Nils Kucher; Sylvia C McKean; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  E E Weinmann; E W Salzman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Initiating warfarin therapy: 5 mg versus 10 mg.

Authors:  Courtney D Eckhoff; Robert J Didomenico; Nancy L Shapiro
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Comparison of 5-mg and 10-mg loading doses in initiation of warfarin therapy.

Authors:  L Harrison; M Johnston; M P Massicotte; M Crowther; K Moffat; J Hirsh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Warfarin reversal: consensus guidelines, on behalf of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Authors:  Ross I Baker; Paul B Coughlin; Alex S Gallus; Paul L Harper; Hatem H Salem; Erica M Wood
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 10.  Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Pedro Garcia; Wilson Ruiz; Cesar Loza Munarriz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of warfarin algorithms for hospitalized adults: searching for a safe dosing strategy.

Authors:  Jessica L Cohen; Elena Thompson; Liron Sinvani; Andrzej Kozikowski; Guang Qiu; Renee Pekmezaris; Alex C Spyropoulos; Jason J Wang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Warfarin dosing strategies evolution and its progress in the era of precision medicine, a narrative review.

Authors:  Amr Mohamed Fahmi; Hazem Elewa; Islam El Jilany
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-03-05

3.  Analysis of the first therapeutic-target-achieving time of warfarin therapy and associated factors in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Xiaowei Gong; Haiyan Wang; Yadong Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  A Simple Formula for Predicting the Maintenance Dose of Warfarin with Reference to the Initial Response to Low Dosing at an Outpatient Clinic.

Authors:  Masaaki Shoji; Shinya Suzuki; Takayuki Otsuka; Takuto Arita; Naoharu Yagi; Hiroaki Semba; Hiroto Kano; Shunsuke Matsuno; Yuko Kato; Tokuhisa Uejima; Yuji Oikawa; Minoru Matsuhama; Junji Yajima; Takeshi Yamashita
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 1.271

5.  Evaluation of the impact of an integrated care pathway for pulmonary embolism: a quasi-experimental pre-post study.

Authors:  Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez; Alberto Ruano-Raviña; Adriana Lama; Lucía Ferreiro; Jorge Ricoy; José M Álvarez-Dobaño; Juan Suárez-Antelo; M Elena Toubes; Carlos Rábade; Antonio Golpe; Vanessa Riveiro; Ana Casal; Romina Abelleira; Francisco Javier González-Barcala; José R González-Juanatey; Luis Valdés
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.