Literature DB >> 16893712

Comparison of a single end point to determine optimal initial warfarin dosing (5 mg versus 10 mg) for venous thromboembolism.

Rene Quiroz1, Marie Gerhard-Herman, Joshua M Kosowsky, Stacia M DeSantis, Nils Kucher, Sylvia C McKean, Samuel Z Goldhaber.   

Abstract

There remains considerable controversy regarding optimal initial warfarin dosing in patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Therefore, an open-label, randomized trial comparing 2 warfarin initiation nomograms (5 vs 10 mg) was conducted in patients with acute venous thromboembolism. All participants received fondaparinux for > or = 5 days as a "bridge" to warfarin. The primary end point was defined as the number of days necessary to achieve 2 consecutive international normalized ratio laboratory test values > 1.9. A total of 50 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to each of the treatment arms. The median time to 2 consecutive international normalized ratios was 5 days in the 2 groups. There was no statistical difference in achieving the primary end point using either the 5- or the 10-mg nomogram (p = 0.69). These results should provide clinicians with increased warfarin dosing options in patients presenting with acute venous thromboembolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893712     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Oral anticoagulation in the hospital: analysis of patients at risk.

Authors:  Nancy L Dawson; Dusko Klipa; Angela K O'Brien; Julia E Crook; Melanie W Cucchi; Alden K Valentino
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Warfarin dosing strategies evolution and its progress in the era of precision medicine, a narrative review.

Authors:  Amr Mohamed Fahmi; Hazem Elewa; Islam El Jilany
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-03-05

Review 4.  Optimal loading dose for the initiation of warfarin: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carl Heneghan; Sally Tyndel; Clare Bankhead; Yi Wan; David Keeling; Rafael Perera; Alison Ward
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Use of signals and systems engineering to improve the safety of warfarin initiation.

Authors:  G Hyun; J Li; A R Bass; A Mohapatra; S C Woller; H Lin; C Eby; G A McMillin; B F Gage
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Optimal loading dose of warfarin for the initiation of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Kamal R Mahtani; Carl J Heneghan; David Nunan; Clare Bankhead; David Keeling; Alison M Ward; Sian E Harrison; Nia W Roberts; F D Richard Hobbs; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

Review 7.  Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Pedro Garcia; Wilson Ruiz; César Loza Munárriz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.