Literature DB >> 35247148

Warfarin dosing strategies evolution and its progress in the era of precision medicine, a narrative review.

Amr Mohamed Fahmi1, Hazem Elewa2,3, Islam El Jilany4.   

Abstract

Background For decades, vitamin K antagonists and specifically warfarin, have been the sole agents used orally to manage thromboembolic conditions, including stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Several factors lead to warfarin dose variability, including genetic and non-genetic factors which made warfarin management challenging especially at the initiation phase. To overcome the challenges with warfarin dosing at initiation, strategies other than conventional or fixed dosing were introduced and explored. Aim In this narrative review, we aim to discuss and critique the different dosing strategies for warfarin at initiation with more focus on genotype-guided warfarin dosing and the most recent supporting evidence for and against its use. Method Medline database was searched from 1965 to July 2021. Articles addressing different warfarin dosing methods were screened for inclusion. Results A number of methods exist for warfarin initiation. Studies comparing different dosing methods for initiation yielded conflicting outcomes due to differences in study design, population studied, comparator, and outcomes measured. Conclusions Looking at the big picture, the use of genetic dosing for warfarin initiation can lead to better outcomes. Whether these better outcomes are clinically or economically beneficial remains controversial.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP2C9; Genetic-guided warfarin dosing; VKORC1—CYP4F2; Warfarin clinical dosing; Warfarin dosing algorithms; Warfarin fixed dosing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35247148      PMCID: PMC9200678          DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01386-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  36 in total

1.  Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing.

Authors:  P Lenzini; M Wadelius; S Kimmel; J L Anderson; A L Jorgensen; M Pirmohamed; M D Caldwell; N Limdi; J K Burmester; M B Dowd; P Angchaisuksiri; A R Bass; J Chen; N Eriksson; A Rane; J D Lindh; J F Carlquist; B D Horne; G Grice; P E Milligan; C Eby; J Shin; H Kim; D Kurnik; C M Stein; G McMillin; R C Pendleton; R L Berg; P Deloukas; B F Gage
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  The association of age with dosage requirement for warfarin.

Authors:  M Redwood; C Taylor; B J Bain; J H Matthews
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  A randomized trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses.

Authors:  M A Crowther; J B Ginsberg; C Kearon; L Harrison; J Johnson; M P Massicotte; J Hirsh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-01-11

4.  A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel; Benjamin French; Scott E Kasner; Julie A Johnson; Jeffrey L Anderson; Brian F Gage; Yves D Rosenberg; Charles S Eby; Rosemary A Madigan; Robert B McBane; Sherif Z Abdel-Rahman; Scott M Stevens; Steven Yale; Emile R Mohler; Margaret C Fang; Vinay Shah; Richard B Horenstein; Nita A Limdi; James A S Muldowney; Jaspal Gujral; Patrice Delafontaine; Robert J Desnick; Thomas L Ortel; Henny H Billett; Robert C Pendleton; Nancy L Geller; Jonathan L Halperin; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael D Caldwell; Robert M Califf; Jonas H Ellenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Gamma-glutamyl carboxylase and its influence on warfarin dose.

Authors:  Cristi R King; Elena Deych; Paul Milligan; Charles Eby; Petra Lenzini; Gloria Grice; Rhonda M Porche-Sorbet; Paul M Ridker; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Use of pharmacogenetics and clinical factors to predict the maintenance dose of warfarin.

Authors:  Brian F Gage; Charles Eby; Paul E Milligan; Gerald A Banet; Jill R Duncan; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 7.  Optimal loading dose of warfarin for the initiation of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Kamal R Mahtani; Carl J Heneghan; David Nunan; Clare Bankhead; David Keeling; Alison M Ward; Sian E Harrison; Nia W Roberts; F D Richard Hobbs; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

8.  Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for Pharmacogenetics-Guided Warfarin Dosing: 2017 Update.

Authors:  J A Johnson; K E Caudle; L Gong; M Whirl-Carrillo; C M Stein; S A Scott; M T Lee; B F Gage; S E Kimmel; M A Perera; J L Anderson; M Pirmohamed; T E Klein; N A Limdi; L H Cavallari; M Wadelius
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Pedro Garcia; Wilson Ruiz; César Loza Munárriz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

10.  Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data.

Authors:  T E Klein; R B Altman; N Eriksson; B F Gage; S E Kimmel; M-T M Lee; N A Limdi; D Page; D M Roden; M J Wagner; M D Caldwell; J A Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the Role of a Malonamide Linker in the Design of Potent Dual Inhibitors of Factor Xa and Cholinesterases.

Authors:  Rosa Purgatorio; Nicola Gambacorta; Francesco Samarelli; Gianfranco Lopopolo; Modesto de Candia; Marco Catto; Orazio Nicolotti; Cosimo D Altomare
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Pharmacogenomics implementation in cardiovascular disease in a highly diverse population: initial findings and lessons learned from a pilot study in United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Zeina N Al-Mahayri; Lubna Q Khasawneh; Mais N Alqasrawi; Sahar M Altoum; Gohar Jamil; Sally Badawi; Dana Hamza; Lizy George; Anwar AlZaabi; Husam Ouda; Fatma Al-Maskari; Juma AlKaabi; George P Patrinos; Bassam R Ali
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 6.481

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.