Literature DB >> 26822009

Pressure topography metrics for high-resolution pharyngeal-esophageal manofluorography-a normative study of younger and older adults.

N Nativ-Zeltzer1, J A Logemann1, S G Zecker1, P J Kahrilas2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to define normative values for novel pressure topography metrics for high-resolution pharyngeal-esophageal manofluorography. The effects of age, gender, and bolus properties were examined.
METHODS: Concurrent high-resolution manometry (HRM) and videofluoroscopy data were collected from 22 younger (aged 21-40) and 22 older (aged 60-80) healthy subjects. Pressure topography was analyzed by correlating pressure domains with videofluoroscopic events. Nine pressure topography metrics of the pharyngeal and proximal esophageal swallow were extracted; four of these were also compared with previously obtained esophageal HRM studies to assess the effects of catheter diameter. KEY
RESULTS: Older individuals exhibited more vigorous contractility in the pharynx than did younger subjects with all bolus types, but the greatest values for both groups were with effortful swallow and on that measure the age groups were similar. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) intrabolus pressure during sphincter opening was also greater in the older subjects. Some gender differences were observed, particularly related to proximal esophageal contractile vigor. Bolus consistency had no consistent effect. Studies using the larger catheter diameter resulted in significantly greater contractile vigor in the UES and proximal esophagus. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Older adults exhibited more vigorous pharyngeal contractions than young adults, albeit within a similar range of capacity, perhaps reflecting a compensatory response to other age-related physiological changes. Greater UES intrabolus pressures observed during bolus transit in the older group likely reflect reduced UES compliance with age. Normative data on novel HRM metrics collected in this study can serve as a reference for future clinical studies.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dysphagia; high-resolution manometry; mano-fluorography; pharyngeal swallow; upper esophageal sphincter

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26822009      PMCID: PMC4892368          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  49 in total

1.  Role of laryngeal movement and effect of aging on swallowing pressure in the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  M Yokoyama; N Mitomi; K Tetsuka; N Tayama; S Niimi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  UES opening and cricopharyngeal bar in nondysphagic elderly and nonelderly adults.

Authors:  Rebecca Leonard; Katherine Kendall; Susan McKenzie
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Oropharyngeal swallowing in normal adults of different ages.

Authors:  J Robbins; J W Hamilton; G L Lof; G B Kempster
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Effects of age, gender, bolus condition, viscosity, and volume on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressure and temporal measurements during swallowing.

Authors:  Susan G Butler; Andrew Stuart; Donald Castell; Gregory B Russell; Kenneth Koch; Shannon Kemp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: impedance and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Evaluating the tongue-hold maneuver using high-resolution manometry and electromyography.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Corinne A Jones; Corrine A Jones; Jason D Mielens; Chloe H Kim; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Xerostomia: 12-month changes in saliva production and its relationship to perception and performance of swallow function, oral intake, and diet after chemoradiation.

Authors:  Jeri A Logemann; Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Cathy L Lazarus; Bharat Mittal; Joy Gaziano; Linda Stachowiak; Ellen MacCracken; Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Effect of bolus volume and viscosity on pharyngeal automated impedance manometry variables derived for broad Dysphagia patients.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Eddy Dejaeger; Jan Tack; Dirk Van Beckevoort; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Classification of high-resolution manometry data according to videofluoroscopic parameters using pattern recognition.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Corinne A Jones; Zhixian Geng; Suzan M Abelhalim; Chelsea C Walczak; Alyssa R Mitchell; Jack J Jiang; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  27 in total

1.  Pharyngeal contractile and regulatory characteristics are distinct during nutritive oral stimulus in preterm-born infants: Implications for clinical and research applications.

Authors:  Varsha Prabhakar; Kathryn A Hasenstab; Erika Osborn; Lai Wei; Sudarshan R Jadcherla
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  The Relationship Between Hiatal Hernia and Cricopharyngeus Muscle Dysfunction.

Authors:  Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer; Anaïs Rameau; Maggie A Kuhn; Matthew Kaufman; Peter C Belafsky
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Pharyngeal peristaltic pressure variability, operational range, and functional reserve.

Authors:  Mark K Kern; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian; Patrick Sanvanson; Dilpesh Agrawal; Ashley Wuerl; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Joanne Li Shen Ooi; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

5.  Correlates of Early Pharyngeal High-Resolution Manometry Adoption in Expert Speech-Language Pathologists.

Authors:  Corinne A Jones; Angela L Forgues; Nicole M Rogus-Pulia; Jason Orne; Cameron L Macdonald; Nadine P Connor; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Alterations to Swallowing Physiology as the Result of Effortful Swallowing in Healthy Seniors.

Authors:  Sonja M Molfenter; Chuan-Ya Hsu; Ying Lu; Cathy L Lazarus
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  The pharyngeal contractile integral is a useful indicator of pharyngeal swallowing impairment.

Authors:  A O'Rourke; K Humphries; A Lazar; B Martin-Harris
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Volumetric Changes to the Pharynx in Healthy Aging: Consequence for Pharyngeal Swallow Mechanics and Function.

Authors:  Sonja M Molfenter; Charles Lenell; Cathy L Lazarus
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Effect of Body Position on Pharyngeal Swallowing Pressures Using High-Resolution Manometry.

Authors:  Sarah P Rosen; Suzan M Abdelhalim; Corinne A Jones; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  A human model of restricted upper esophageal sphincter opening and its pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena.

Authors:  Hongmei Jiao; Ling Mei; Tarun Sharma; Mark Kern; Patrick Sanvanson; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.